Exploration Strategies in Night Vision Sensors (STRAT-JVN)

The main objective of this clinical trial is to identify a variation in visual strategy characterized by both head movements and eye movements of healthy volunteers during a target detection task when images simulating night vision goggles (NVG) are presented, compared to a situation in which the images simulate a natural environment.

To highlight changes in environmental scanning with simulated images from NVG, objective measurements will be collected:

  • eye movements characterized by saccades (speed, latency, and number) for each stimulus
  • head movements (horizontal angle of the participant's head) for each stimulus and throughout the exposure

Participants sit facing a screen (9.90 m x 2.10 m) onto which a virtual scene is projected. The objective is to correctly identify, as quickly as possible, a target stimulus (represented by a tank) that may appear in the scene. They must use the directional arrows on a game controller to indicate whether the tank is moving to the left or to the right.

There are four visits involving four viewing conditions in which the task remains the same:

  • With restricted field of view and a normal scene.
  • Without restricted field of view and a scene simulating the vision obtained by NVGs.
  • With restricted field of view and a scene simulating the vision obtained by NVGs.
  • Without restricted field of view and a normal scene. Regarding the content of the scene, half of the tests in each visit involve a so-called poor scene when fog is simulated, or an enriched scene when there is no fog. Each visit lasts approximately one hour and thirty minutes.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

10

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

French volunteers

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Affiliated with social security;
  • Normal vision or vision corrected with lenses (far vision ≤ 0.03 log unit (≥ 9/10) OD/OG/binocular);
  • No current or past ocular or binocular pathology: strabismus or amblyopia;
  • Signed non-objection form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women;
  • Incapacitated adults;
  • Individuals who do not understand French (written or spoken).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Eye movements characterized by saccades (speed, latency, and number) for each stimulus
Time Frame: Day 1 (Visit 1) and during follow-up visits at Day 2 (Visit 2), Day 3 (Visit 3), and Day 4 (Visit 4)
Measurements from eyetracker
Day 1 (Visit 1) and during follow-up visits at Day 2 (Visit 2), Day 3 (Visit 3), and Day 4 (Visit 4)
Head movements (horizontal angle of the participant's head) for each stimulus and throughout the exposure
Time Frame: Day 1 (Visit 1) and during follow-up visits at Day 2 (Visit 2), Day 3 (Visit 3), and Day 4 (Visit 4)
Measurements extract from motion capture
Day 1 (Visit 1) and during follow-up visits at Day 2 (Visit 2), Day 3 (Visit 3), and Day 4 (Visit 4)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The average stimulus detection times.
Time Frame: Day 1 (Visit 1) and during follow-up visits at Day 2 (Visit 2), Day 3 (Visit 3), and Day 4 (Visit 4)
Measurements from an eyetracker
Day 1 (Visit 1) and during follow-up visits at Day 2 (Visit 2), Day 3 (Visit 3), and Day 4 (Visit 4)
Number of correct responses to the perceptual task
Time Frame: Day 1 (Visit 1) and during follow-up visits at Day 2 (Visit 2), Day 3 (Visit 3), and Day 4 (Visit 4)
Extract with software
Day 1 (Visit 1) and during follow-up visits at Day 2 (Visit 2), Day 3 (Visit 3), and Day 4 (Visit 4)
Visual fatigue will be measured using a questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 1 (Visit 1) and during follow-up visits at Day 2 (Visit 2), Day 3 (Visit 3), and Day 4 (Visit 4)
To highlight subjective visual fatigue generated by changes in visual search strategies using simulated images from night vision sensors.
Day 1 (Visit 1) and during follow-up visits at Day 2 (Visit 2), Day 3 (Visit 3), and Day 4 (Visit 4)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 25, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 25, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2025-A00047-42

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Visual Acuity

Subscribe