Randomized Trial of Buprenorphine Microdose Inductions During Hospitalization (Micro-bupe)

April 19, 2026 updated by: Montefiore Medical Center
Investigators will test a novel protocol for starting BUP (buprenorphine-naloxone) treatment. The BUP microdose induction protocol has participants start very low doses of BUP without stopping other opioids that they are taking. The treatment as usual (TAU) has participants stop other opioids and experience opioid withdrawal before starting BUP. Investigators propose to test BUP microdose inductions vs. TAU in a randomized controlled trial.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Investigators will conduct a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation study, using a pragmatic, open-label, randomized controlled trial (RCT). Investigators will randomize 270 hospitalized patients with (a) chronic pain and (b) opioid misuse or opioid use disorder (OUD) to a 5-day BUP microdose induction protocol (without stopping full agonists) or 2-day standard induction (with stopping full agonists), and then link participants to outpatient BUP treatment when they are released from the hospital. Study assessment visits will occur at baseline, 1 week, and 1, 3, and 6 months. Assessments will include interviews and urine drug tests to determine whether participants start BUP, continue BUP, have improvements in pain and decrease illicit opioid use. During induction and 3-months of follow-up, investigators will also collect data on mobile devices to assess opioid withdrawal, opioid craving, pain, and anxiety. These data will allow investigators to assess whether BUP microdosing targets of engagement-opioid- and pain-related symptoms-mediate OUD outcomes. Exploratory analyses will also examine pain as a trigger for opioid relapse.

Aim 1: To test the effectiveness of BUP microdose induction (vs. TAU) on OUD outcomes.

H1: The microdose arm (vs. TAU) will have better BUP treatment uptake and retention, and less illicit opioid use.

H2: Improvements in H1 will be mediated by opioid- and pain-related symptoms.

Aim 2: To test the effectiveness of microdosing (vs. TAU) on pain outcomes. H3: The microdose arm (vs. TAU) will have less pain intensity and interference, and improved quality of life.

H4: Improvements in H3 will be mediated by OUD outcomes.

Aim 3: To inform future implementation and dissemination efforts, investigators will:

3a) Examine factors influencing reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of BUP microdosing. Investigators will use qualitative and quantitative methods to describe multi-level factors influencing these domains; 3b) Calculate the cost and examine cost-effectiveness of BUP microdosing. H5: Compared with TAU, BUP microdosing will be cost-effective from a societal and a health sector perspective.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

23

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • The Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
        • Montefiore Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years
  • Opioid misuse or OUD
  • Chronic pain
  • Currently taking opioids
  • Fluency in English or Spanish
  • Planned hospitalization for ≥ 48 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current OUD treatment (BUP, methadone, naltrexone)
  • Severe alcohol or benzodiazepine use disorder
  • Hypersensitivity to BUP or naloxone
  • Pain due to malignancy
  • Severe untreated mental illness (suicidality, psychosis)
  • Pregnancy
  • Unable to consent due to pain or cognitive impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: BUP microdose induction
Participants in this arm will receive a novel BUP microdose induction protocol.

Participants will be started on a 5-day BUP microdose induction protocol (without stopping full agonists).

Day 1: participants will receive buprenorphine (Belbuca) 225 mcg mg every 12 hours Day 2: participants will receive buprenorphine (Belbuca) 450 mcg every 8 hours Day 3: participants will receive buprenorphine-naloxone 2-0.5 mg every 8 hours Day 4: participants will receive buprenorphine-naloxone 4-1 mg every 8 hours Day 5: participants will receive buprenorphine-naloxone 8-2 mg every 12 hours

Participants will be given an expedited appointment (within 2 weeks) to continue BUP treatment at a Montefiore community health center
Active Comparator: Treatment As Usual (TAU)
Participants in this arm will receive standard BUP induction protocol.
Participants will be given an expedited appointment (within 2 weeks) to continue BUP treatment at a Montefiore community health center
2-day standard BUP induction protocol (with stopping full agonists) Day 1: hold all opioids Day 2: buprenorphine-naloxone 2-0.5 mg every 6 hours Day 3: buprenorphine-naloxone 8-2 mg every 12 hours

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
BUP Treatment Uptake
Time Frame: 7 days
The percentage of participants who start BUP treatment, defined as receiving BUP 7 days after the baseline visit, will be reported for each arm.
7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Illicit Opioid Use
Time Frame: 1, 3, and 6 months
The mean number of days of illicit opioid use, defined as self-reported use of heroin, fentanyl, or non-prescribed opioid analgesics in the prior 30 days based on the Addiction Severity Index, will be reported for each arm.
1, 3, and 6 months
BUP Retention in Care
Time Frame: 1, 3, and 6 months
The number/percentage of participants who are retained in BUP treatment, defined as having a BUP prescription written 180-210 days (6-month retention) after enrollment, will be reported for each arm.
1, 3, and 6 months
Pain Intensity
Time Frame: 3 months
Mean pain intensity score, measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), will be reported for each study arm. The pain intensity score has 4 items that are each rated on a scale from 0 (low intensity) to 10 (high intensity). The score reported is the average score from the 4-items also reported on a scale of 0-10.
3 months
Pain Interference
Time Frame: 3 months
Mean pain interference score, measured using the pain interference scale from the BPI, which is a 7-item instrument measuring the impact of pain on daily activities and physical functioning, will be reported for each study arm. Each item is rated on a scale from 0 (low interference) to 10 (high interference). The score reported is the average score from the 7-items also reported on a scale of 0-10.
3 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Intensity
Time Frame: 3 months
Mean pain intensity score, measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), will be reported for each study arm.
3 months
Pain interference
Time Frame: 3 months
Mean pain interference score, measured using the pain interference scale from the BPI, which is a 7-item instrument measuring the impact of pain on daily activities and physical functioning, will be reported for each study arm.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aaron Fox, MD, Montefiore Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 29, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 23, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

April 9, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 11, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe