Effectiveness of a Physical Therapy Telerehabilitation Program in Long Post COVID-19 Symptoms in Primary Health Care. (TPhysioCovid)

August 20, 2024 updated by: MARIA JOSE DIAZ ARRIBAS, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Effectiveness of a Multimodal Physical Therapy Telerehabilitation Program in Long Post COVID-19 Symptoms in Primary Health Care.

The evolution of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic makes it more necessary the intervention of Primary Health Care Physiotherapy Units in patients with respiratory and/or functional sequelae after suffering from SARS-CoV-2 (acute respiratory sindrome by coronavirus) virus infection.

Since some months ago, Primary Health Care use telerehabilitation tools to connect patients and health care professions while maintaining social distancing and restrictions. Tele-physiotherapy is a field of physiotherapy which has the advantage of providing physical therapy interventions to patients' complications after COVID-19 by using a videoconferencing method. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a multimodal Physical Therapy telerehabilitation program in persistent post COVID-19 symptoms in Primary Health Care.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is a multisystem infectious disease which has led to a global pandemic. The evolution of COVID-19 disease makes it more necessary the intervention of Primary Health Care Physiotherapy Units in patients with respiratory and /or functional sequelae after suffering from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Problems such as breathlessness, exercise intolerance and loss of peripheral muscle strength can be observed in individuals who have been diagnosed with persistent post COVID-19.

Since some months ago, Primary Health Care use telerehabilitation tools to connect patients and health care professions while maintaining social distancing and restrictions. Tele-physiotherapy is a field of physiotherapy which has the advantage of providing physical therapy interventions to patients' complications after COVID-19 by using a videoconferencing method. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a multimodal Physical Therapy telerehabilitation program in persistent post COVID-19 symptoms in Primary Health Care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

71

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain, 28040
        • María José Díaz Arribas

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with long post-COVID symptoms (from week 12 to week 24).
  • Patients between 25 and 70 years old.
  • Patients with moderate respiratory and/or functional affectation with long post COVID-19 symptoms, belonging to four Physiotherapy Units of primary Health Care in Madrid (Spain).
  • Confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 via a positive nasopharyngeal or throat swab within the past 12 months.
  • Persistent symptoms lasting ≥12 weeks since the first positive test, including dyspnea (new or increased from baseline as measured by modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) score ≥1).
  • Normal oxygen saturation (greater than 90%) by pulse oximetry at rest on room air.
  • Participant owns a smart phone, tablet, or computer to access on-line sessions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • People with symptoms such as fever, cough, upper respiratory distress, diarrhea, vomiting, anosmia or ageusia.
  • Temperature greater than 37.2 degrees Celsius.
  • Patients with multimorbidity. Multimorbidity will be considered when the patient is diagnosed with two or more diseases among the following: diabetes, dyslipidaemia, cardiovascular disease (arterial hypertension, ischemic heart disease, valvular heart disease, heart failure), osteoarthritis, respiratory disease (asthma, chronic bronchitis), digestive disease ( gastric or duodenal ulcers, inflammatory bowel disease, liver disease), psychiatric pathology or tumor pathology.
  • Patients with previous pathologies: ischemic heart disease, dementia, lung failure, lung cancer, cystic fibrosis, pulmonary fibrosis, chronic kidney failure, liver diseases, myocardial arrhythmias, deep vein thrombosis, severe aortic stenosis, liver diseases.
  • Patients with weakened immune systems: in cancer treatment, organ or marrow transplant patients, HIV/AIDS, prolonged use of prednisone or similar medication.
  • Patients with functional limitations to carry out their basic activities of daily living. Barthel index greater than 90.
  • Patients with cognitive problems. Mini-Cognitive Lobo exam greater than 23 points
  • Active bleeding.
  • Unstable fractures.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Tele-physiotherapy group

Allocated participants to intervention group will receive 18 Tele-physiotherapy sessions (three sessions per week, with 30 min. of duration) during six weeks. In this sessions, participants will carry out a tele-face-to-face multimodal physical therapy program based on health education, respiratory exercises, physical training exercises, aerobic exercises and functional mobility.

This group will receive conventional medical care too.

A Tele-face-to-face multimodal physical therapy program based on health education, respiratory exercises, physical training exercises, aerobic exercises and functional mobility.
Other Names:
  • Therapeutic exercise
Active Comparator: Control group

No Physical therapy intervention. Allocated participants to control group will receive one consultation session by the physiotherapist, but will not received any physical Therapy treatment. At this session, patients will be educated about how to perform their daily activities, breathing exercises, walking. Conventional medical care will be provided.

In the control group, the same measurements will be made at the same times as the subjects in the intervention group. Once the study is finished, the researcher agrees to carry out the intervention to the patients in the control group.

A Tele-face-to-face multimodal physical therapy program based on health education, respiratory exercises, physical training exercises, aerobic exercises and functional mobility.
Other Names:
  • Therapeutic exercise

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Borg scale.
Time Frame: Baseline.
Modified Borg scale, or scale of perceived exertion, is a subjective scale to measure the intensity of a physical effort, quantifying the respiratory distress. The modified Borg Scale is averaged from 0 to 10. Perceived effort will be measured as 0-2 (light effort), 3-4 (moderate effort), 5-6 (hard effort), 7-9 (very hard effort) and 10 (maximum effort).
Baseline.
Modified Borg scale.
Time Frame: 6 weeks.
Modified Borg scale, or scale of perceived exertion, is a subjective scale to measure the intensity of a physical effort, quantifying the respiratory distress. The modified Borg Scale is averaged from 0 to 10. Perceived effort will be measured as 0-2 (light effort), 3-4 (moderate effort), 5-6 (hard effort), 7-9 (very hard effort) and 10 (maximum effort).
6 weeks.
Modified Borg scale.
Time Frame: 10 weeks.
Modified Borg scale, or scale of perceived exertion, is a subjective scale to measure the intensity of a physical effort, quantifying the respiratory distress. The modified Borg Scale is averaged from 0 to 10. Perceived effort will be measured as 0-2 (light effort), 3-4 (moderate effort), 5-6 (hard effort), 7-9 (very hard effort) and 10 (maximum effort).
10 weeks.
Modified Borg scale.
Time Frame: 14 weeks.
Modified Borg scale, or scale of perceived exertion, is a subjective scale to measure the intensity of a physical effort, quantifying the respiratory distress. The modified Borg Scale is averaged from 0 to 10. Perceived effort will be measured as 0-2 (light effort), 3-4 (moderate effort), 5-6 (hard effort), 7-9 (very hard effort) and 10 (maximum effort).
14 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Score.
Time Frame: Baseline.

Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Score (mMRC). The mMRC Dyspnea Score is used to establish baseline functional impairment due to dyspnea.The severity of dyspnea is rated on a scale of 0 to 4. "O" means no dyspnea perception, "4" means severe dyspnea perception.

Grade 0: absence of dyspnea when performing intense exercise. Grade 1: dyspnea when walking quickly on the flat or climbing. Grade 2: dyspnea does not allow walking with another person of the same age or the person has to stop to rest.

Grade 3: dyspnea makes the patient stops to rest when walking for 100m or a few minutes after walking on the flat.

Grade 4: dyspnea prevents the patient from leaving home or appears in activities of daily living.

Baseline.
Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Score.
Time Frame: 6 weeks.

Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Score (mMRC). The mMRC Dyspnea Score is used to establish baseline functional impairment due to dyspnea.The severity of dyspnea is rated on a scale of 0 to 4. "O" means no dyspnea perception, "4" means severe dyspnea perception.

Grade 0: absence of dyspnea when performing intense exercise. Grade 1: dyspnea when walking quickly on the flat or climbing. Grade 2: dyspnea does not allow walking with another person of the same age or the person has to stop to rest.

Grade 3: dyspnea makes the patient stops to rest when walking for 100m or a few minutes after walking on the flat.

Grade 4: dyspnea prevents the patient from leaving home or appears in activities of daily living.

6 weeks.
Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Score.
Time Frame: 10 weeks.

Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Score (mMRC). The mMRC Dyspnea Score is used to establish baseline functional impairment due to dyspnea.The severity of dyspnea is rated on a scale of 0 to 4. "O" means no dyspnea perception, "4" means severe dyspnea perception.

Grade 0: absence of dyspnea when performing intense exercise. Grade 1: dyspnea when walking quickly on the flat or climbing. Grade 2: dyspnea does not allow walking with another person of the same age or the person has to stop to rest.

Grade 3: dyspnea makes the patient stops to rest when walking for 100m or a few minutes after walking on the flat.

Grade 4: dyspnea prevents the patient from leaving home or appears in activities of daily living.

10 weeks.
Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Score.
Time Frame: 14 weeks.

Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Score (mMRC). The mMRC Dyspnea Score is used to establish baseline functional impairment due to dyspnea.The severity of dyspnea is rated on a scale of 0 to 4. "O" means no dyspnea perception, "4" means severe dyspnea perception.

Grade 0: absence of dyspnea when performing intense exercise. Grade 1: dyspnea when walking quickly on the flat or climbing. Grade 2: dyspnea does not allow walking with another person of the same age or the person has to stop to rest.

Grade 3: dyspnea makes the patient stops to rest when walking for 100m or a few minutes after walking on the flat.

Grade 4: dyspnea prevents the patient from leaving home or appears in activities of daily living.

14 weeks.
Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire.
Time Frame: Baseline.
Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is a questionnaire to assess the quality of life in patients with respiratory problems. It is made up of 50 items divided into three scales: symptoms, activity and impact. The SGRQ ranges from 0 (no impairment of quality of life) to 100 (highest impairment of quality of life).
Baseline.
Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire.
Time Frame: 6 weeks.
Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is a questionnaire to assess the quality of life in patients with respiratory problems. It is made up of 50 items divided into three scales: symptoms, activity and impact. The SGRQ ranges from 0 (no impairment of quality of life) to 100 (highest impairment of quality of life).
6 weeks.
Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire.
Time Frame: 10 weeks.
Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is a questionnaire to assess the quality of life in patients with respiratory problems. It is made up of 50 items divided into three scales: symptoms, activity and impact. The SGRQ ranges from 0 (no impairment of quality of life) to 100 (highest impairment of quality of life).
10 weeks.
Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire.
Time Frame: 14 weeks.
Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is a questionnaire to assess the quality of life in patients with respiratory problems. It is made up of 50 items divided into three scales: symptoms, activity and impact. The SGRQ ranges from 0 (no impairment of quality of life) to 100 (highest impairment of quality of life).
14 weeks.
6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT).
Time Frame: Baseline.

6MWT is a test that measures the distance walked by each patient for 6 minutes, 30 meters on a flat and hard surface. The 6MWT assesses the level of submaximal functional capacity. The patient has to walk as far as possible for 6 minutes.

Performance is classified into 4 categories:

Category A: less than 350 meters; poor performance. Category B: between 350 and 450 meters; moderate performance. Category C: between 450 and 650 meters; good performance. Category D: more than 650 meters; excellent performance.

Baseline.
6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT).
Time Frame: 6 weeks.

6MWT is a test that measures the distance walked by each patient for 6 minutes, 30 meters on a flat and hard surface. The 6MWT assesses the level of submaximal functional capacity. The patient has to walk as far as possible for 6 minutes.

Performance is classified into 4 categories:

Category A: less than 350 meters; poor performance. Category B: between 350 and 450 meters; moderate performance. Category C: between 450 and 650 meters; good performance. Category D: more than 650 meters; excellent performance.

6 weeks.
6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT).
Time Frame: 10 weeks.

6MWT is a test that measures the distance walked by each patient for 6 minutes, 30 meters on a flat and hard surface. The 6MWT assesses the level of submaximal functional capacity. The patient has to walk as far as possible for 6 minutes.

Performance is classified into 4 categories:

Category A: less than 350 meters; poor performance. Category B: between 350 and 450 meters; moderate performance. Category C: between 450 and 650 meters; good performance. Category D: more than 650 meters; excellent performance.

10 weeks.
6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT).
Time Frame: 14 weeks.

6MWT is a test that measures the distance walked by each patient for 6 minutes, 30 meters on a flat and hard surface. The 6MWT assesses the level of submaximal functional capacity. The patient has to walk as far as possible for 6 minutes.

Performance is classified into 4 categories:

Category A: less than 350 meters; poor performance. Category B: between 350 and 450 meters; moderate performance. Category C: between 450 and 650 meters; good performance. Category D: more than 650 meters; excellent performance.

14 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: María José Díaz-Arribas, PhD., Director of Physical Therapy Section.
  • Study Director: Gustavo Plaza Manzano, PhD., Sub-director of Pysical Therapy Section.
  • Study Director: Mabel Ramos Sánchez, PhD., Tenured University Professor.
  • Principal Investigator: José Calvo Paniagua, Master, Associated Clinical Professor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 25, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 15, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

May 9, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 16, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID-19

Clinical Trials on Physiotherapy

Subscribe