Does Performing a Composite Test 3 Months Post-operatively Reduce the Risk of Failure to Return to Sport After Lateral Ankle Ligamentoplasty?

March 31, 2026 updated by: Clinique du Sport, Bordeaux Mérignac

Ankle sprain is one of the most common pathologies in the general population (between 2.1 and 3.2 per 1000 patients per year). Nearly 40% of patients will develop chronic instability in the year following the sprain. We also know that a premature return to sport is a risk factor for developing chronic instability. However, despite the consensus of experts on the subject which have shown the key physiological elements to evaluate before resuming sport, no test or cohort of tests are proposed to allow a safe return to sport by reducing the risks of relapse. Some very recent studies have appeared on non-operated subjects but this remains a subject that is still too little studied, where the lack of consensus and objective criteria increases the risk of instability. Surgical treatment remains an effective option to reduce the risk of recurrence but failure of the latter can occur in approximately 13-37% of patients depending on the population, due to a relapse or a return to sport which does not correspond to expectations. of the patient.

The objective of the study is therefore to evaluate the predictive nature of a composite test (ANKLE-GO) regarding the return to sport at the same level and the risks of recurrence.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

116

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Mérignac, France, 33700
        • Recruiting
        • Clinique du Sport Bordeaux Merignac
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Guillaume Cordier, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with objective chronic ankle instability who has failed medical treatment and undergone lateral ankle ligament repair surgery
  • Patient practicing a sporting activity at least 2 times a week
  • Patient able to read, write and understand French
  • Patient affiliated to a social security scheme

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Minor or over 50 years of age
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding patient
  • Patient under guardianship, deprived of liberty or under court protection
  • Refusal to participate in research
  • Patient unable to understand or give informed consent
  • Patient having undergone associated surgical procedures modifying the postoperative course
  • Patient having undergone revision surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Personnalized physiotherapy

Following completion of the ankle go test, patients in "experimental" group will receive specific instructions for continuing their rehabilitation, which will be passed on to the physiotherapist in charge of their rehabilitation.

These instructions will be adapted according to the results of the composite test and the items identified. The scores of the various functional tests in the composite test will be evaluated to establish the key elements to be taken into account for subsequent management. These instructions will necessarily be personalized according to the scores.

Following completion of the ankle go test, patients in "experimental" group will receive specific instructions for continuing their rehabilitation, which will be passed on to the physiotherapist responsible for the rehabilitation.
Active Comparator: Usual physiotherapy
Following completion of the ankle go test, patients in "active comparator" group will undergo conventional rehabilitation following surgery.
Following completion of the ankle go test, patients in "active comparator" group will receive usual physiotherapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1-year post-surgery return to sport : Tegner questionnaire
Time Frame: before surgery (anterior practice) and year 1
evaluation of sport practice level with Tegner questionnaire : Likert scale from 0 (professionnal disability) to 10 (professionnal sport)
before surgery (anterior practice) and year 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sports level at 1 year post-surgery compared with previous level
Time Frame: Year 1
Questionnaire "yes/no"
Year 1
Number of hours of sport per week
Time Frame: before surgery (anterior practice) and year 1
Self administered questionnaire
before surgery (anterior practice) and year 1
Ankle instability scale (FAAM questionnaire : Foot and Ankle Ability Measure)
Time Frame: before surgery (anterior practice) and month 3
self-administered questionnaire to measure patients' functional progress. It comprises two subscales: a 21-item daily activity subscale, and an 8-item sports subscale. For each subscale, each item is rated on a Likert scale from 0 to 4.
before surgery (anterior practice) and month 3
Pain: EVA analog scale
Time Frame: month 1, month 3, month 6, year 1
EVA scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximal possible pain)
month 1, month 3, month 6, year 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Guillaume Cordier, MD, Clinique du Sport

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 17, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 2, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023-08-SBM_Composite

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ankle Injuries

Clinical Trials on Personnalized physiotherapy

Subscribe