Use of the Orthoglide for Improved Patient Outcome Following Total Knee Replacement

June 4, 2020 updated by: Ambreen Chohan

Does the Use of an Orthoglide Device Improve Patient Outcome, Following Total Knee Replacement

Total knee replacements are a common orthopaedic procedure undertaken at Blackpool Victoria Hospital. Following surgery patients are routinely seen by Physiotherapists who prescribe exercises to improve the range of movement and strength of the knee joint, thus aiding recovery. One of the key exercises prescribed involves the bending and straightening of the knee to improve range of movement. At this early stage of rehabilitation , due to weakness in the knee joint, reducing any resistance to this motion is beneficial. The Orthoglide device is designed to aid the patient in performing this movement by reducing the friction/resistance caused by the heel sliding against the bed. Currently this is achieved using a 'slider board' and placing a rolled up piece of fabric under the patients heel. The aim of this study is to investigate whether or not issuing an Orthoglide device to patients following total knee replacements improves functional outcomes reported by the patient at 6 weeks and 12 weeks post-surgery. Participants will be assigned to either receive an Orthoglide device and standard Physiotherapy or standard Physiotherapy alone. A series of patient reported outcome measures will be taken pre-surgery, 6 weeks post surgery and 12 weeks post surgery and the results compared.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

It is hypothesised that issuing an Orthoglide device following total knee replacement will improve patient reported outcomes. The null-hypothesis is that there is no correlation between the issuing of an Orthoglide device and improved patient reported outcome measures post total knee replacement.

The following outlines the various stages which the research participants will pass through during the study:

  1. Initial contact - having been identified as requiring a total knee replacement the patient will attend Blackpool Victoria Hospital for a routine pre-operative assessment. During this contact the patient will be given an information pack relating to the project, this patient information sheet will include an invitation to participate, information regarding confidentiality, contact information as well as a consent form to be taken away and considered at home.
  2. Homeward visit - The Homeward team routinely complete home visits with all patients who are awaiting a total knee replacement. During this visit the clinician will further discuss the study and, if the patient wishes to take part, the consent forms may be collected. The visiting clinician will store these sealed envelopes in-line with trust policy on data protection - in a lockable drawer/cabinet upon return to the hospital, this will only be accessible by the Homeward Team and research team.
  3. Establishing baseline measurements - Consent forms will be reviewed by Robyn Jones and a copy placed in the patients records. Contact details will be recorded on secure access computer folder and participants contacted on preferred telephone number to establish baseline scores of outcome measures, gaining verbal consent prior to commencing. Consent forms will be stored in patients notes via coding with a further copy remaining in a secured storage location only accessible by the research team, for our records. Outcome measure scores will be inputted onto an anonymised and encrypted spreadsheet which will be stored on a password protected computer folder.
  4. Randomisation - Due to the time period the trial will take place over the investigators will employ block randomisation to allow the participants to be grouped in a timely manner prior to their surgery. Once the participants identity has been anonymised and encrypted participants will be randomised in groups of 10, i.e. every 10 patients recruited will be randomised as one block. This process will repeat for every group of 10 recruited until capacity is reached for the intervention group and the control group. As a feasibility study it is estimated that 30 participants in each arm will be sufficient to give adequate power.
  5. Identification of participants on weekly operation list - The Orthopaedic Physiotherapy team routinely access operation lists to identify the appropriate patients for Physiotherapy input. These operation lists will be cross referenced with our participant list to identify those taking part in the study and which group participants have been randomised into.
  6. Patients will attend Blackpool Victoria Hospital for surgery. Routine post-operative Physiotherapy rehabilitation protocols will be followed with the only variation being the issue of an Orthoglide device to those in the study group and not to those in the control group - as identified in stage 5. Patients generally remain an in-patient for approximately 3 days post surgery.
  7. 6 week follow up call - 6 weeks after the date of surgery (recorded in the secured spreadsheet from the weekly operation list)the research team will contact the patient to complete the outcome measures as used in stage 3, this data will be inputted onto the anonymised and encrypted spreadsheet stored on a password protected computer.
  8. 12 week follow up call - 12 weeks after the date of surgery the research team will contact the patient to complete the outcome measures as used in stage 3 and 7, this data will be inputted onto the anonymised and encrypted spreadsheet stored on a password protected computer.
  9. Data analysis and write up - Once all data is collected it will be analysed using the appropriate statistical analysis method and software. This study is designed to cause as little disruption to the routine patient journey as possible. Outside of routine contacts made by the direct care team, the only additional commitments participants must make is to be contacted by telephone by the research team 3 times (pre-operative baseline, 6 week follow-up and 12 week follow-up), each lasting approximately 20-15 minutes. It is estimated that from recruitment a participant will be involved with the study for a maximum of 24 weeks - preoperative clinics must be no more than 12 weeks prior to the surgery and the second follow-up phone call will be 12 weeks post operation. The overall timeframe for the project will be 24 months from April 2018 to April 2020, this includes ethics applications, data collection (to begin from November 2018), analysis and write up. Both arms of the trial will receive the same amount of Physiotherapy input (2 x daily visits) during their in-patient stay.

The only variable will be the issue of an Orthoglide device for the trial group to assist with completion of their knee exercises instead of a 'slider-board'. As a feasibility study no interim reports are planned however as soon as data has been analysed and reported upon it will be made available to the participants. participants will be randomised using block randomisation and data sets anonymised for analysis thus minimising researcher bias by all reasonable means for a study of this nature.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

31

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Lancashire
      • Blackpool, Lancashire, United Kingdom, FY3 8NR
        • Blackpool Victoria Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients planned to undergo a unilateral total knee replacement at Blackpool Victoria Hospital aged between 45 to 75 years,
  • Independently mobile with or without a walking aid.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other lower limb orthopaedic surgery within the last six-months,
  • No anticipated further lower limb orthopaedic surgery within the next 12-months,
  • No rheumatoid arthritis, neurological conditions affecting lower limb function.
  • No Cognitive impairment,
  • No co-morbidity which would act as a contraindication to engaging with prescribed exercise
  • No existing participation in other clinical trials which may impact rehabilitation outcomes.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Physiotherapy only
Standard treatment post Total Knee Arthroplasty
Physiotherapy only.
Other Names:
  • Physiotherapy
Experimental: Physiotherapy + Orthoglide intervention
Standard treatment post TKA, with additional Orthoglide device provided.
Knee rehabilitation device.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 6 and 12 weeks
Scores range from 0 to 100 with a score of 0 indicating the worst possible knee symptoms and 100 indicating no knee symptoms. A better score would be indicated by a higher number closer to 100.
Change from Baseline to 6 and 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Numerical Pain Rating Score (NPRS)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 6 and 12 weeks
Scored from 0 to 10. Higher scores (closer to 10) indicate a higher level of pain and lower numbers indicate less pain. A minimal clinically important change in NPRS is a 2 point improvement.
Change from Baseline to 6 and 12 weeks
Change in Exercise Adherence Rating Scale
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 6 and 12 weeks
EARS consists of 6 questions scored on a 5-point Likert scale, with positively worded questions reverse scored, giving a final rating from 0 (lowest adherence) to 24 (highest adherence). Better adherence is sought with any intervention
Change from Baseline to 6 and 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: James Richards, PhD, University of Central Lancashire

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 28, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 15, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 15, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Physiotherapy only

Subscribe