- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05131542
Assessment of Hypotonia in Children With Down Syndrome
January 19, 2022 updated by: María Guadalupe de Santos Moreno, Universidad de Murcia
Development of a Measuring Instrument for the Evaluation of Hypotonia in Children With Down Syndrome
Hypotonia is a common trait in infants with Down syndrome, resulting in pathologies and delays in gaining basic motor skills.
There are no screenings available to aid in early diagnosis, therefore, the purpose of this study is to develop a way to test for hypotonia in children with Down syndrome.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Detailed Description
Hypotonia is usually diagnosed by observation and clinical assessment.
Aiming to develop an instrument for early diagnosis, a systematic review was carried out which compiled characteristics and testing that are attributed to or used in the diagnosis of hypotonia.
They were presented as an item group and a first stage was created and administered to 50 children with Down's Syndrome between the ages of 7 months to 8 years old.
The study of the results showed which characteristics were really related to the convention and which were more affected by changing factors.
Then a final scale was developed that met the expected requirements of validity and reliability.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
50
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Murcia, Spain, 30100
- University of Murcia
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
7 months to 8 years (Child)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Down Syndrome
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Volunteer parents who have Infants with Down Syndrome Between the ages of 7 months to 8 years old
Exclusion Criteria:
- Other hypotonic syndromes
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Case-Only
- Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
Down Syndrome
Children with down syndrome
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Quality assessment of items by homogeneity analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS-21 program.
Time Frame: 1 month
|
A study of homogeneity of the items was carried out to know if each item was measuring the same as the globality of the test.
It was carried out by means of a reliability study of the statistics of each item compared to the total scale.
|
1 month
|
|
Analysis of the reliability of the scale
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Reliability was measured by Cronbach's alpha.
An interclass and inter-judge correlation analysis was performed
|
1 month
|
|
Content validity
Time Frame: 1 month
|
It was done through expert judgment.
It was reviewed by three physiotherapists with extensive experience in treating hypotonic children and those items directed to the orofacial complex were also agreed with an expert speech therapist.
|
1 month
|
|
Empirical validity.
Time Frame: 1 month
|
The correlation between the graduation of hypotonia derived from the scale and the observational diagnosis estimated by the evaluator was analyzed.
An ANOVA test was used to compare both diagnostic assessments.extensive
experience in treating hypotonic children and those items directed to the orofacial complex were also agreed with an expert speech therapist.
|
1 month
|
|
Structural validity
Time Frame: In the process of analysis. 1 month to get results.
|
Through an exploratory factor analysis.
Factorial analysis was carried out using the FACTOR program.
|
In the process of analysis. 1 month to get results.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Descriptive analysis of the scale
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Analyzing the values of standard deviation, mean, bias and kurtosis.
|
1 month
|
|
Frequency analysis of the items.
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Frequency with which 0 (less hypotonia), 1 or 2 (greater hypotonia) each item of the scale has been scored.
|
1 month
|
|
Analysis of the scale items.
Time Frame: 1 month
|
An analysis of standard deviation, mean, correlation and Cronbach's alpha was performed for each item that made up the scale.
|
1 month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mª Guadalupe de Santos Moreno, MSc PT, Unicersity of Murcia
- Study Director: Antonia Gómez Conesa, PhD PT, Unicersity of Murcia
- Study Director: José Antonio López Pina, PhD, Unicersity of Murcia
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Martin K, Inman J, Kirschner A, Deming K, Gumbel R, Voelker L. Characteristics of hypotonia in children: a consensus opinion of pediatric occupational and physical therapists. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2005 Winter;17(4):275-82. doi: 10.1097/01.pep.0000186506.48500.7c.
- Govender P, Joubert RWE. 'Toning' up hypotonia assessment: A proposal and critique. Afr J Disabil. 2016 May 26;5(1):231. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v5i1.231. eCollection 2016.
- Goo M, Tucker K, Johnston LM. Muscle tone assessments for children aged 0 to 12 years: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018 Jul;60(7):660-671. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13668. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
- Martin K, Kaltenmark T, Lewallen A, Smith C, Yoshida A. Clinical characteristics of hypotonia: a survey of pediatric physical and occupational therapists. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2007 Fall;19(3):217-26. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0b013e3180f62bb0.
- Govender P, Joubert RWE. Evidence-Based Clinical Algorithm for Hypotonia Assessment: To Pardon the Errs. Occup Ther Int. 2018 Apr 24;2018:8967572. doi: 10.1155/2018/8967572. eCollection 2018.
- Naidoo P, Joubert RW. Consensus on hypotonia via Delphi process. Indian J Pediatr. 2013 Aug;80(8):641-50. doi: 10.1007/s12098-013-1018-7. Epub 2013 May 17.
- Reus L, van Vlimmeren LA, Staal JB, Janssen AJ, Otten BJ, Pelzer BJ, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW. Objective evaluation of muscle strength in infants with hypotonia and muscle weakness. Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Apr;34(4):1160-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.12.015. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
- Naidoo P. Development of an evidence-based clinical algorithm for practice in hypotonia assessment: a proposal. JMIR Res Protoc. 2014 Dec 5;3(4):e71. doi: 10.2196/resprot.3581.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
April 1, 2019
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 31, 2021
Study Completion (Actual)
January 15, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 21, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 11, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
November 23, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
January 21, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 19, 2022
Last Verified
January 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1999/2018
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.