Motivational Interviewing With Diabetes Patients

December 24, 2021 updated by: Deniz KAYA MERAL, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa

Effects of Motivational Interviewing Intervention on Self- Management and HbA1c in Type 2 Diabetes Patients

This study was conducted in a quasi-experimental research design with a pretest-posttest control group to determine the effect of motivational interviewing on self-management and HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes. The sample of the study consisted of 25 experimental and 26 controls, who applied to an outpatient clinic in a training and research hospital.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study was conducted in a quasi-experimental research design with a pretest-posttest control group to determine the effect of motivational interviewing on self-management and HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes. The sample of the study consisted of 25 experimental and 26 controls, who applied to an outpatient clinic in a training and research hospital. After the pretest, the experimental group was intervened with a motivational interview (MI) method that consisted of four sessions; the control group received routine treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey, 34255
        • Ministry of Health, Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years and older
  • Having been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes for more than 3 months
  • Being in the contemplation
  • Preparation, and/or action stages of any section of the Behavioral Change Stage Identification Form of the Trans-Theoretical Model
  • Having HbA1c levels above 6
  • Agreeing to take part in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having a perception disorder that will prevent communication
  • Having been diagnosed with any mental disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group
After the pretest, the experimental group was intervened with a motivational interview (MI) method that consisted of four sessions of 30-60 (mean 45 min) min each. The sessions were structured according to the Behavior Change Stage Identification Form developed by the researcher by making use of the trans-theoretical model and adapting it to diabetic patients. The subject of the first session was "Opening, Structuring the Discussion, and Establishing the Agenda"; the subject of the second session was "Improving Motivation for Change"; the subject of the third session was "Summarizing, Support, and Talking about the Change"; and the subject of the fourth session was "Evaluation" . The discussions were completed in four weeks, with one discussion held every week. The final test and the Diabetes Self-Management Instrument were applied again to the members of the intervention group in the third month after completion of the MI method sessions.
After the pretest, the experimental group was intervened with a motivational interview (MI) method that consisted of four sessions.The pretest and posttest Diabetes Self-Management Scale total scores and HbA1c values of the patients in the experimental and control groups were compared.
No Intervention: Control group
The control group received routine treatment. The final test and the Diabetes Self-Management Instrument were applied again to the members of the control group in the third month.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of the pretest-posttest Diabetes Self-management Instrument-35 scores
Time Frame: 3 months
The instrument is comprised of 35 questions covering the period from the previous three months to determine the frequency of the implementation of the self-management skills of the patients. The total score for the Instrument ranged from 35 to 140. A higher score showed that self-management activities were implemented on a more regular basis. Interventions consisted of four sessions of 30-60 (mean 45 min) min each. The sessions were structured according to the Behavior Change Stage Identification Form developed by the researcher by making use of the trans-theoretical model and adapting it to diabetic patients.The discussions were completed in four weeks, with one discussion held every week. The final test and the Diabetes Self-Management Instrument were applied again to the members of the intervention group in the third month after completion of the MI method sessions and in the third month to the control group.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of the pretest-posttest HbA1c values
Time Frame: 3 months
The pretest and posttest HbA1c values of the patients in the experimental and control groups were compared in the third month.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Deniz Kaya Meral, Phd, Ministry of Health, Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 7, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 7, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 7, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

There is no plan to share to Individual participant data

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes

Clinical Trials on motivational interview

3
Subscribe