Oncological Differences Between Transanal and Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.

January 21, 2022 updated by: Yanhong Deng
The primary purpose of this study is to compare the differences of oncological in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or transanal endoscopy radical resection. The secondary purpose is to compare the effect of two different surgical methods on prognosis.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) is a new surgical procedure for total mesorectal excision (TME) by dissociating the mesorectum from the bottom through transanal endoscopic. The characteristics of TaTME are mainly summarized as transanal reverse operation, no auxiliary abdominal incision, complete mesorectal excision and specimen removal through the anus. So taTME is a natural orifice specimen extraction procedure (NOSES). However, similar to NOSES, the specific surgical approach to taTME surgery may raise oncological safety concerns. Due to the premature contact with the tumor, the squeezing of the tumor cannot be avoided during the operation. The tumor may also be squeezed when the specimen is removed through the anus, putting the tumor cells at risk of shedding into the abdominal and pelvic cavity.

Whether TaTME is safe and feasible still needs strong evidence-based medical evidence. However, there have been prospective studies related to oncological in NOSES surgery, but there is a lack of prospective clinical studies on the issue of oncological diffusion during taTME surgery. Therefore, the investigators conducted a randomized controlled study to collect the abdominal and pelvic irrigation fluids in the transanal and laparoscopic TME surgery for oncological examination, to clarify the influence of the two different surgical methods on the intraoperative oncological diffusion. The purpose of this study was to clarify the effect of two different surgical methods on intraoperative tumor cell proliferation, and to compare the long-term oncological outcomes of the two surgical methods, so as to provide more evidence-based medical evidence for the safety of taTME surgery.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

192

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510655
        • Recruiting
        • Department of colorectal surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

192 rectal cancer patients will be enrolled. Patients must be older than 18 years.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primary rectal carcinoma
  • Single lesion
  • No metastasis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of malignant tumors
  • Acute bowel obstruction, bleeding or perforation
  • Tumor over 6cm in diameter or in severe adhesion with surrounded tissues
  • Severe other contradictions of surgery
  • Pregnant women will be excluded

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
laparoscopic surgery
Different surgical methods for rectal cancer resection
Transanal endoscopic surgery
Different surgical methods for rectal cancer resection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The positive rate of oncological contamination of peritoneal washings
Time Frame: 1 years
Determination of tumor cell positive rate by tumor cell examination of peritoneal washings
1 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Disease free survival
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 21, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 3, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectum Cancer

3
Subscribe