- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05232474
Using KomPas+ in the Treatment of Patients With Intermittent Claudication
Implementation and Evaluation of a Guideline-based Clinical Decision Support System (KomPas+) Used by Therapists and Patients in the Treatment of Intermittent Claudication: a Cluster Randomized Trial With a Parallel Process Evaluation
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Nijmegen, Netherlands, 6525 EP
- IQ healthcare, Radboudumc
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria Primary objective:
- All therapists affiliated with Chronisch Zorgnet and specialized in the treatment of people with intermittent claudication are eligible to participate. Besides, all patients referred to a Chronisch Zorgnet therapist with intermittent claudication specialty are eligible to participate.
Inclusion Criteria Secondary objective:
- Provides written informed consent (both therapist and patients)
- Therapists should have finished two KomPas (control group) or KomPas+ (experimental group) e-learnings
- Therapists should have applied KomPas (control group) or KomPas+ (experimental group) to at least one patient with intermittent claudication
Inclusion Criteria Third objective:
- All therapists affiliated with Chronisch Zorgnet and specialized in the treatment of people with intermittent claudication who are included in the experimental group are eligible to participate.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Not applicable due to the "real world" setting of the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Control group: no access to KomPas+
Therapists in the control group will not have access to KomPas+ and will continue to deliver usual care by using the KNGF guideline.
They will also maintain access to KomPas.
As with KomPas+, therapists are free to choose whether to use KomPas or not.
The use of KomPas will also be encouraged.
|
KomPas is an online tool showing personalized outcome forecasts.
These forecasts have been developed using real-world data of patients with intermittent claudication for physiotherapists in daily practice.
The forecasts visualize the estimated outcome of supervised exercise therapy (walking distance and quality of life), for an individual patient with intermittent claudication.
The information provided is based on patients similar to the individual patient from a large database.
The actual outcome data of these similar patients are used to create an individual forecast.
KomPas plots the estimated therapy outcome in time, thereby making personalized outcome forecasts.
The forecasts are not used to direct the choices of treatment, but to motivate the patient, monitor the treatment process and to set realistic goals.
|
|
Experimental: Experimental group: access to KomPas+
KomPas+ will be implemented within the experimental group.
The use of KomPas+ in the physiotherapeutic treatment of patients with intermittent claudication will not be mandatory but will be encouraged through an implementation strategy.
Therapists are free to choose whether to use it or not.
|
KomPas is an online tool showing personalized outcome forecasts.
These forecasts have been developed using real-world data of patients with intermittent claudication for physiotherapists in daily practice.
The forecasts visualize the estimated outcome of supervised exercise therapy (walking distance and quality of life), for an individual patient with intermittent claudication.
The information provided is based on patients similar to the individual patient from a large database.
The actual outcome data of these similar patients are used to create an individual forecast.
KomPas plots the estimated therapy outcome in time, thereby making personalized outcome forecasts.
The forecasts are not used to direct the choices of treatment, but to motivate the patient, monitor the treatment process and to set realistic goals.
KomPas+ is a guideline-based clinical decision support system.
With KomPas+, the aim is to integrate KomPas with the guideline recommendations for the conservative treatment process of patients with intermittent claudication.
KomPas+ is a web-based tool, aimed to facilitate person-centered and participatory healthcare.
Therapists have access to a tool that will help, for example, to improve consistency between patient-specific goals and the treatment plan.
Using KomPas+, therapists are encouraged to discuss choices in the treatment plan with the patient.
It is expected that the included topics in KomPas+ will not be burdensome for both patients and therapists.
Topics to discuss are, for example, Frequency, Intensity, Time and Type (FITT) for drawing up a training schedule.
KomPas+ is meant to facilitate therapists and patients in the SDM process.
It does not force patients to take part in the SDM process against their will.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change from Baseline in Functional walking distance (FWD) using a standardized treadmill test at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months.
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 months and 6 months
|
The treadmill test is based on the graded Gardner-Skinner protocol.
FWD is defined as the distance at which the patient would prefer to stop walking in daily life.
|
Change from baseline at 3 months and 6 months
|
|
Mean Change from Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life using the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire-6 (VascuQol-6) at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months.
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 3 months and 6 months
|
The VascuQol-6 consists of six questions related to activities, symptom burden, pain, emotions and social consequences.
The score ranges from 6 to 24, with a higher score representing a better quality of life.
|
Change from baseline at 3 months and 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Level of Person-Centredness assessed by using a Patient-Administered Questionnaire at the initial consult with the patient with intermittent claudication in which treatment goals and treatment plan are discussed.
Time Frame: During the initial consult with the patient with intermittent claudication in which treatment goals and treatment plan are discussed. This moment varies between the date of inclusion to three weeks after the date of inclusion.
|
The used questions are part of the 36-item patient-centered primary care (PCPC) instrument.This Dutch instrument is specifically developed to assess person centered care in primary care setting for patients with multimorbidity.
The complete PCPC instrument consists of 36 items divided over eight domains which are based on the eight dimensions of person centered care identified by the Picker Institute.
For this study, the seven questions which form the subdomain 'Patients' preferences' are used.
For example, patients will be asked if they felt taken seriously, if their wishes and preferences were taken into account and if they were involved in decisions about their treatment.
Each of the seven questions will be responded by a five-point scale ranging from 1 (totally disagree) to 5 (totally agree) resulting in a total score between 7 and 35.
|
During the initial consult with the patient with intermittent claudication in which treatment goals and treatment plan are discussed. This moment varies between the date of inclusion to three weeks after the date of inclusion.
|
|
Level of Shared Decision Making (SDM) assessed by scoring video-records of clinical consultations with the Observer Patient Involvement (OPTION) 5 scale at the initial consult with the patient in which treatment goals and treatment plan are discussed.
Time Frame: During the initial consult with the patient with intermittent claudication in which treatment goals and treatment plan are discussed. This moment varies between the date of inclusion to three weeks after the date of inclusion.
|
The five items of the OPTION-5 are based on the five core dimensions of SDM: alternate options (item 1), forming a partnership (item 2), inform about options (item 3), eliciting preferences (item 4), and integrate preferences (item 5).
Each item will be scored on a five-point Likert scale from 0 (no effort) to 4 (exemplary effort) to obtain objective data of the SDM process.
Item scores will be summed so that the potential total score is between 0 and 20.
The total score will be rescaled to lie between 0 and 100.
|
During the initial consult with the patient with intermittent claudication in which treatment goals and treatment plan are discussed. This moment varies between the date of inclusion to three weeks after the date of inclusion.
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Perceived barriers and facilitators to (not) use KomPas+ in the physiotherapeutic treatment of patients with intermittent claudication using a qualitative assessment.
Time Frame: Between six and twelve months after the start of the implementation of KomPas+
|
Semi-structured interviews within the experimental group.
Both therapists who did use and did not use KomPas+ will be interviewed.
The purpose will be to gain insight into why therapists did (not) use KomPas+, and therefore uncover ways to improve the uptake of using KomPas+ in the treatment of patients with intermittent claudication.
|
Between six and twelve months after the start of the implementation of KomPas+
|
|
The degree of implementation of KomPas+ in terms of reach and demand measured by website logs (demand) and the use of KomPas+ (reach).
Time Frame: After the 4-month inclusion period
|
Within the experimental group, website logs will show how many therapists completed multiple e-learnings aimed at (learning to use) KomPas+ (demand).
Besides, it will be measured for how many newly referred patients KomPas+ is used during the inclusion period of the study, versus the number of new patients for which KomPas+ was not used.
The difference gives an indication of the scope of the implementation (reach).
|
After the 4-month inclusion period
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Thomas Hoogeboom, PhD, Radboud university medical center, IQ healthcare
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2021-13373
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.