Artificial Intelligence (AI) Assisted Real-time Adenoma Detection and Classification During Colonoscopies

February 28, 2025 updated by: Daniel Von Renteln, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

This is a pragmatic, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, to evaluate the effect of implementing a Computer-assisted detection (CADe) system within the routine clinical practice of Canadian healthcare institutions.

The main hypothesis of this study is that the ADR in the operating room equipped with the GI genius CADe system will be significantly higher than the ADR in the ordinary operating room.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This trial will be conducted in four centers across Canada. All patients who meet the in/exclusion criteria can be enrolled. The patient's personal medical history will be reviewed to verify patient inclusion and exclusion criteria (age, history of CRC or adenoma, comorbid conditions, anticoagulation, etc.).

Eligible patients will be randomized (1:1) stratified per center, endoscopist, sex, and age group in two arms:

  1. Intervention arm: patients will be assigned to undergo colonoscopy in a room equipped with the GI genius CADe system.
  2. Control arm: patients will undergo colonoscopy in a room not equipped with the GI genius CADe system.

The endoscopists performing the colonoscopies will not be involved in the development and implementation of CADe. Additionally, they won't be informed of the ongoing trial and will have the option of not using the CADe when available in the room. This design aims to mitigate operator biases that may be partly responsible for the observed difference between the CADe performance in randomized controlled trials and the CADe performance in implementation studies.

Data will be collected on case report forms (CRF), after the procedure, from the clinical files and the endoscopy reports. The data will then be deidentified and transferred to an electronic RedCap database in each institution. A research assistant will collect all information and annotations recorded on the patient's medical file during the procedure.

In the treatment group (operating room equipped with the CADe), the Medtronic-GI genius system can be used for real-time support by the endoscopists to detect polyps of all sizes. Use of CADe is left to the discretion of the treating physician performing the colonoscopy. If used, CADe will provide real-time feedback throughout each colonoscopy procedure and will alert the endoscopists of the presence of a polyp in the endoscopy field by displaying a bounding box on the same screen.

In the control group (colonoscopy performed in room without CADe system), the participating endoscopists will detect as per standard of care.

All colonoscopies (in the intervention and control groups) including polypectomy procedures will be performed at the discretion of the treating physician and per standard of care.

All polyps will be resected as per standard of care and sent to the pathology labs of the participating institutions to be evaluated for histology by board-certified pathologists. The histopathology outcomes will be collected and stored in the CRF forms to be used as a reference later.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1596

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montréal, Quebec, Canada
        • Recruiting
        • Centre hospitalier universitaire de Montréal
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Daniel von Renteln, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • indication of undergoing a screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy
  • Age 45-89 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing emergency colonoscopy
  • Patients with a known familial polyposis syndrome or a known inflammatory bowel disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Operating room equipped with the CADe (Medtronic-GI genius for real-time detection)
The Medtronic-GI genius (CADe) system can be used to detect polyps of all sizes. Use of CADe is left to the discretion of the treating physician performing the colonoscopy. If used CADe will provide real-time feedback throughout each colonoscopy procedure and will alert the endoscopists of the presence of a polyp in the endoscopy field by displaying a bounding box on the same screen.
Medtronic-GI genius: AI will provide real-time feedback throughout each colonoscopy procedure and alert endoscopists to the presence of a polyp in the endoscopy field by displaying a bounding box on the same screen.
No Intervention: Colonoscopy performed in room without CADe system
In the control group (standard colonoscopy), the participating endoscopists will detect and classify colorectal lesions without using any AI modules.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ADR
Time Frame: 30 days
The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is defined as the proportion of colonoscopies with at least 1 histopathologically proven adenoma or carcinoma detected.
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proximal ADR
Time Frame: 30 days
Proximal ADR is defined as the prevalence of patients with at least 1 adenoma detected proximal to the splenic flexure
30 days
Sessile serrated lesions (SSL) detection rate
Time Frame: 30 days
Sessile serrated lesions (SSL) detection rate as the proportion of patients colonoscopy in whom superior or equal to 1 sessile serrated lesion (SSL) is identified
30 days
Mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy (APC)
Time Frame: 30 days
Mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy (APC) defined as the total number of adenomas divided by the number of colonoscopies performed
30 days
Sessile serrated lesion per Colonoscopy (SSLPC)
Time Frame: 30 days
Sessile serrated lesion per Colonoscopy (SSLPC), defined as the total number of histologically confirmed sessile serrated lesions resected divided by the total number of colonoscopies
30 days
Advanced lesion detection rate (ALDR)
Time Frame: 30 days
Advanced lesion detection rate (ALDR), defined as the proportion of colonoscopies for which the number of histopathologically proven adenoma >10mm was at least 1.
30 days
Proportion neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps
Time Frame: 30 days
Proportion neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps (i.e., SSLs, hyperplastic polyps, and high-grade dysplasia and carcinomas (overall and according to size, location, and morphology)
30 days
CADe utilization rate
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 years
CADe utilization rate (when available in the room). Since the CADe utilization rate cannot be assessed without revealing the ongoing trial to the endoscopists, two voluntary self-reported measures and a partially objective measure. First, endoscopists will be surveyed via email during and at the end of the trial regarding their use of CADe, while keeping them unaware of the ongoing trial. Second, the proportion with endoscopy reports for which is is explicitly stated that CADe was used will be computed.
Through study completion, an average of 3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel von Renteln, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal (CHUM)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 8, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Artificial Intelligence

Clinical Trials on Medtronic-GI genius (CADe system for detecting colorectal polyps)

Subscribe