- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05250674
Clinical Evaluation of CEM-guided Biopsy
CEM-guided biopsy is an optional accessory of Senographe Pristina intended to provide accurate location of lesions in the breast in three dimensions, using information obtained from Contrast Enhanced Mammography (CEM) images. This information provides guidance for a variety of minimally invasive or interventional procedures in the breast such as vacuum assisted biopsy, core biopsy, presurgical localization (e.g. hook wire), and fine needle aspirations (FNA). This device cannot be used for reasons other than its intended use.
This evaluation is being done to learn more about the CEM-guided biopsy. Clinical user and operational feedback is a central part of the development process for medical devices in which information from real clinical use is required to optimize the device prior to commercial release.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Pristina Serena CEM is an option to the standard Pristina Serena breast biopsy unit. It is designed to allow the accurate localization of lesions in the breast in three dimensions, using information obtained from Contrast Enhanced Mammography (CEM) images. It is intended to provide guidance for histological purposes such as core or vacuum-assisted biopsies, for pre-surgical localization procedures, or Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) for cytopathology analysis.
The main purpose of this evaluation is to collect feedback to assess image readability and look-and feel, usability, workflow and user preference information from physicians and technologists who use CEM-guided biopsy to perform minimally invasive interventional breast procedures under clinical conditions. All feedbacks are collected by observations, interviews and surveys.
The evaluation population consists of adult women, presenting with clinical indication for a breast biopsy procedure after a positive abnormal CEM or MRI examination, and considered eligible for this procedure as per standard of care.
Eligible subjects undergo the clinically indicated breast biopsy procedure using the Pristina Serena CEM-guided biopsy. Region of interest location is determined by using stereotactic pairs of CEM images after injection of iodinated contrast media. All necessary equipment and instrumentation, medications, or other devices required to complete the subject's clinically indicated procedure shall be used and are not expected to be influenced by evaluation participation.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Catalonia
-
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, 08003
- Hospital del Mar - Parc de Salut Mar
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult women presenting with clinical indication for a breast biopsy procedure after a positive abnormal CEM or MRI examination, and considered eligible for this procedure as per standard of care.
- Are able and willing to comply with study procedures
- Are able and willing to provide written informed consent to participate
Exclusion Criteria:
- Findings not accessible for stereotactic guidance biopsy
- Are currently lactating
- Have breast implants
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Case-Only
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Adult women with indication for a breast biopsy procedure after an abnormal CEM or MRI examination.
Adult women presenting with clinical indication for a breast biopsy procedure after a positive abnormal CEM or MRI examination and no clear ultrasound or mammography correlation.
|
The evaluation population consists of adult women, presenting with clinical indication for a breast biopsy procedure after a positive abnormal CEM or MRI examination (with no clear ultrasound or mammography correlation) and considered eligible for this procedure as per standard of care. Eligible subjects undergo the clinically indicated breast biopsy procedure using the Pristina Serena Bright ® CEM-guided biopsy. Region of interest location is determined by using stereotactic pairs of CEM images after injection of iodinated contrast media. All necessary equipment and instrumentation, medications, or other devices required to complete the subject's clinically indicated procedure shall be used and are not expected to be influenced by evaluation participation. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Image visibility of enhancing finding
Time Frame: immediately after each CEM-guided biopsy
|
To assess the visibility of an index enhancing finding at the point of the CEM-guided biopsy.
The enhancement in the biopsy images will be compared to the enhancing lesion initially detected at the diagnostic CEM examination, that led to the prescription of the breast biopsy.
It is a subjective and dichotomous measure: visible or not visible.
|
immediately after each CEM-guided biopsy
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pathology results on biopsy specimen
Time Frame: up to 3 weeks
|
Pathology results are classified according to the National Health Service Breast Screening Program (NHSBSP) classification for breast biopsies in B1 (normal tissue), B2 (benign lesion), B3 (lesion of uncertain malignant potential), B4 (suspicious), B5 (malignant).
|
up to 3 weeks
|
|
Upgrade rate to malignancy of biopsied lesions that underwent surgical or percutaneous intervention
Time Frame: an average of 3 months
|
To evaluate the upgrade rate to malignancy of lesions that were further assessed with surgical or percutaneous intervention.
The term "upgrade to malignancy" applies for lesions that were diagnosed as high-risk lesions at biopsy (B3), but with final pathology at excision changed to malignancy (in situ or invasive), as well as for in situ lesions at biopsy upstaged to invasive cancer at surgery.
|
an average of 3 months
|
|
Number of participants with CEM-guided biopsy minor complications.
Time Frame: immediately after each CEM-guided biopsy
|
To register the number of participants that underwent minor complications related to the CEM-guided procedure, such as presence of immediate hematoma in biopsy bed or experienced vasovagal reactions during or inmediately after the procedure.
This information will be registered in three categories: hematoma, vasovagal reaction or no complications.
|
immediately after each CEM-guided biopsy
|
|
Biopsy needle approach
Time Frame: immediately after each CEM-guided biopsy
|
To register the needle entry to the breast in order to access the intended lesion during the biopsy procedure as it was through a vertical or horizontal approach.
It is a dichotomous measure: vertical or horizontal.
|
immediately after each CEM-guided biopsy
|
|
Total time per procedure
Time Frame: immediately after each CEM-guided biopsy
|
To register the time spent during the biopsy procedure.
The time will be considered since the intravenous contrast administration until the breast decompression, immediately after clip marker deployment.
It is a numeric variable and will be measured in minutes and evaluated as a median interquartile range.
|
immediately after each CEM-guided biopsy
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Schrading S, Distelmaier M, Dirrichs T, Detering S, Brolund L, Strobel K, Kuhl CK. Digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial experiences and comparison with prone stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology. 2015 Mar;274(3):654-62. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14141397. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
- Wecsler J, Jeong YJ, Raghavendra AS, Mack WJ, Tripathy D, Yamashita MW, Sheth PA, Hovanessian Larsen L, Russell CA, MacDonald H, Sener SF, Lang JE. Factors associated with MRI detection of occult lesions in newly diagnosed breast cancers. J Surg Oncol. 2020 Mar;121(4):589-598. doi: 10.1002/jso.25855. Epub 2020 Jan 26.
- Meissnitzer M, Dershaw DD, Lee CH, Morris EA. Targeted ultrasound of the breast in women with abnormal MRI findings for whom biopsy has been recommended. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Oct;193(4):1025-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2480.
- Abe H, Schmidt RA, Shah RN, Shimauchi A, Kulkarni K, Sennett CA, Newstead GM. MR-directed ("Second-Look") ultrasound examination for breast lesions detected initially on MRI: MR and sonographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Feb;194(2):370-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2707.
- Perlet C, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Heinig A, Sittek H, Casselman J, Anderson I, Taourel P. Magnetic resonance-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results from a European multicenter study of 538 lesions. Cancer. 2006 Mar 1;106(5):982-90. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21720.
- Siegmann-Luz KC, Bahrs SD, Preibsch H, Hattermann V, Claussen CD. Management of breast lesions detectable only on MRI. Rofo. 2014 Jan;186(1):30-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1335972. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
- Santiago L, Candelaria RP, Huang ML. MR Imaging-Guided Breast Interventions: Indications, Key Principles, and Imaging-Pathology Correlation. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2018 May;26(2):235-246. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2017.12.002. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
- Esserman LE, Cura MA, DaCosta D. Recognizing pitfalls in early and late migration of clip markers after imaging-guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiographics. 2004 Jan-Feb;24(1):147-56. doi: 10.1148/rg.241035052.
- Clauser P, Mann R, Athanasiou A, Prosch H, Pinker K, Dietzel M, Helbich TH, Fuchsjager M, Camps-Herrero J, Sardanelli F, Forrai G, Baltzer PAT. A survey by the European Society of Breast Imaging on the utilisation of breast MRI in clinical practice. Eur Radiol. 2018 May;28(5):1909-1918. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5121-4. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
- Schrading S, Strobel K, Keulers A, Dirrichs T, Kuhl CK. Safety and Efficacy of Magnetic Resonance-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Large-Volume Breast Biopsy (MR-Guided VALB). Invest Radiol. 2017 Mar;52(3):186-193. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000331.
- Neeter LMFH, Raat HPJF, Alcantara R, Robbe Q, Smidt ML, Wildberger JE, Lobbes MBI. Contrast-enhanced mammography: what the radiologist needs to know. BJR Open. 2021 Nov 24;3(1):20210034. doi: 10.1259/bjro.20210034. eCollection 2021.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2019-8890
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Contrast Enhanced Mammography-guided Biopsy
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterTerminatedBreast Neoplasm | Contrast-enhanced Spectral MammographyNetherlands
-
University of MichiganCompletedMammography | Biopsy, NeedleUnited States
-
Yonsei UniversityRecruitingLiver Biopsy | Image-guided BiopsyKorea, Republic of
-
Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul,...RecruitingProstate Biopsy | Post Biopsy Bleeding | Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate BiopsySouth Korea
-
Becton, Dickinson and CompanyCompletedContrast Enhanced Computed TomographyUnited States
-
UConn HealthRecruitingContrast Enhanced Images vs. Non-contrast Images | Gadopiclinol Enhanced Images vs. Gadobutrol Enhanced ImagesUnited States
-
GuerbetCompletedContrast-enhanced MRI With Dotarem
-
University of California, DavisNot yet recruitingBiopsy | EUS Guided Biopsy | Diagnosis of a Pancreaticobiliary DisorderUnited States
-
University of BernRecruitingLiver | Ultrasonic Diagnosis | Contrast Enhanced UltrasoundSwitzerland
Clinical Trials on CEM-guided biopsy
-
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)WithdrawnCastration-Resistant Prostate Carcinoma | Metastatic Prostate Carcinoma | Stage IV Prostate Cancer
-
Bracco Diagnostics, IncBracco Imaging S.p.A.TerminatedProstate CancerItaly, Austria, France, Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, United Kingdom
-
Saskatchewan Health Authority - Regina AreaCompleted
-
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, BhubaneswarRecruiting
-
MediView XR, Inc.Enrolling by invitationOncology | Liver Carcinoma | Renal Carcinoma | Biopsy | Interventional RadiologyUnited States
-
Heinrich-Heine University, DuesseldorfCompleted
-
Graziella di GreziaLink Campus University; University of Campania Luigi VanvitelliEnrolling by invitationBreast Cancer Diagnosis | Breast Cancer PreventionItaly
-
Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, ChinaRecruitingLung NeoplasmsChina
-
Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCSGeneral ElectricCompletedBreast Cancer | CalcificationItaly
-
Ardeshir RastinehadPhilips HealthcareRecruitingProstate Cancer | Prostate Disease | Elevated Prostate Specific Antigen | Family History of Prostate Cancer | Positive Digital Rectal ExamUnited States