Contrast Enhanced Mammography or Breast Magnetic Resonance: Which Choice for Optimal Diagnostic Performance? (CEM MRI choice)

February 19, 2025 updated by: Graziella di Grezia

Contrast-Enhanced Mammography or Breast MRI: Which Choice for Optimal Diagnostic Performance?

This study compares the diagnostic performance of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) and Breast MRI in evaluating breast lesions. It aims to assess sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy to identify the optimal imaging modality for clinical scenarios such as dense breast tissue and high-risk populations.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Search differences and performance of MRI and CEM

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

350

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Naples, Italy, 80138
        • University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population will consist of adult women aged 18 years or older who are referred for advanced breast imaging due to suspicious breast lesions or high-risk factors for breast cancer. The population will include individuals with dense breast tissue or those who have had inconclusive findings from standard mammography, making them candidates for Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) or Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).

The study aims to include a diverse cohort of patients, both in terms of age and background, as long as they meet the inclusion criteria and do not fall under the exclusion criteria. The study will be conducted at ASL Avellino, Italy, and will involve patients from various risk groups, including those with a family history of breast cancer, personal history of other cancers, and those with dense breast tissue who may require advanced imaging for accurate diagnosis.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: Women aged 18 years and older.
  • Indication for Advanced Imaging: Patients referred for Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) or Breast MRI due to suspicious findings or high-risk factors for breast cancer.
  • Dense Breast Tissue or Inconclusive Findings: Patients with dense breast tissue or inconclusive results from standard mammography.

Informed Consent: Ability to provide written informed consent for participation in the study.

- Presence of Breast Tissue: Female or transgender women who have breast tissue suitable for imaging.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to MRI: Patients with contraindications to Breast MRI (e.g., implanted pacemakers, severe claustrophobia, or metallic implants that cannot be removed).
  • Contraindications to Contrast Agents: Patients who have allergies or contraindications to iodinated contrast agents used in CEM.

Severe Renal Impairment: Patients with severe renal impairment (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m²), as they may not safely undergo contrast-enhanced imaging.

  • Pregnancy or Breastfeeding: Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding, as the use of contrast agents may pose risks to the fetus or infant.
  • Already Confirmed Primary Tumor: Patients with a confirmed primary breast malignancy or another primary tumor site (e.g., gastrointestinal, lung) that has already been diagnosed.
  • Other Medical Conditions: Patients with serious medical conditions that may interfere with participation in the study or may affect the safety of the imaging procedures.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
CEM Group

CEM Group:

Patients in this group will undergo Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) as part of their diagnostic imaging workup for breast lesions. The CEM procedure will be used to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of this imaging technique in detecting and characterizing breast lesions in patients with dense breast tissue or inconclusive findings from standard mammography.

CEM combines low-energy mammography with high-energy contrast-enhanced imaging to highlight areas of neo-angiogenesis, which are indicative of malignancy. This intervention will be used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CEM in detecting and characterizing breast lesions, especially in patients with dense breast tissue or inconclusive findings from routine mammography.
Other Names:
  • CEM
MRI Group

MRI Group:

Patients in this group will undergo Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), which will be used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI in detecting and characterizing breast lesions. The MRI procedure will be compared with CEM to assess the differences in diagnostic performance, sensitivity, specificity, and clinical impact in managing patients with high-risk factors or dense breast tissue.

MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging):

MRI will be used as an alternative imaging modality for breast lesion detection and characterization. MRI provides detailed soft tissue imaging and is widely used in the evaluation of high-risk patients or those with dense breast tissue. The results from MRI will be compared to CEM findings to determine which modality offers superior diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic Accuracy of CEM vs. MRI for Breast Lesion Detection and Characterization
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 months
The primary outcome of the study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) and Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in detecting and characterizing breast lesions. This will be assessed by evaluating the sensitivity, specificity, and overall diagnostic performance of both imaging modalities. Findings will be correlated with histopathological results or follow-up imaging to determine the accuracy of each modality in the diagnosis of breast cancer.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity and Specificity of CEM vs. MRI
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 months
This secondary outcome aims to compare the sensitivity and specificity of CEM and MRI in detecting breast lesions. Sensitivity refers to the ability to correctly identify true positives, while specificity refers to correctly identifying true negatives. These metrics will be analyzed to assess the diagnostic capability of each imaging technique.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 months
Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of CEM vs. MRI
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 months
The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) will be calculated for both CEM and MRI. PPV indicates the proportion of positive test results that are true positives, while NPV indicates the proportion of negative test results that are true negatives.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 months
Patient Preference and Tolerability of CEM vs. MRI
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 months
This outcome will assess patient preference and tolerability between CEM and MRI. Patients will be asked to complete a questionnaire regarding their comfort during each imaging procedure, and their preference for one modality over the other will be recorded.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer Diagnosis

Clinical Trials on CEM protocol

Subscribe