Comparision of Two Different Feeding Method in Preterms

March 18, 2026 updated by: Funda Yavanoglu Atay, Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Research and Education Hospital

Comparision of Two Different Feeding Method in Preterm Infants

achievement of optimal postnatal growth by adequate enteral nutrition in critically ill preterm infants is a challenge of NICU. signs like abdominal distension, reflux, vomiting, nec is a factors of discontinuing fedding in preterm. this factors plays a role in decisions about which method of gavage feeding is adopted. we compare two different feeding method to achive less fedding tolerence.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

<1750 gr, <33 gw infants will enroll study. exckusion criteria: major congenital anomalies major gis anomalies

The study infants are enrolled within 24 hours of birth and sequently randomized to either intermitten feeding (IF) and bolus feeding (BF). Intermittent feeding is defined as delivering enteral nutrition and generally giving 60 min and 2 hours no feeding. this circle repeats 8 times in 24 hours. Bolus feeding is the amount of nutrition put into the syringe was kept 10 cm above the baby and the fluidity was obtained by gravity through the orogastric tube. The data of the patients such as feeding intolerance (gastric residual volume more than %50 of the previous feeding volume, gastric regurgitation, abdominal distension and/or emesis ), whether there is a week-by-week feeding intolerance were noted, NEC, time to reached birth weight, time to achieved full enteral feeding, every 5 minutes during feeding, saturation, respiratory rate and heart rates will record.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 day to 3 days (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • <1750 gr preterm infants
  • <33 gw
  • admitted to our nicu in first day of life

Exclusion Criteria:

major congenital anomalies gis anomalies septic shock exitus in 3 days of life

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: bolus feeding group
In bolus feednig group preterm fed by via gravity drip over a short period, usually 15-20 min. it administrated 8-12 times daily
sequential randomization
Other: intermittant feeding group
Intermittant feeding is delivered over a 30-60 min by infusion pump. it administrated 8-12 times daily
sequential randomization

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
rate of feeding intolerence
Time Frame: 1 month
The effect of two different gavage tube feeding methods on feeding intolerance
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
time to reach full enteral feeding
Time Frame: 1 month
The effect of two different gavage tube feeding methods on time to reach full enteral feeding
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Funda Yavanoğlu Atay, md, Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Research and Education Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Richards R, Foster JP, Psaila K. Continuous versus bolus intermittent intragastric tube feeding for preterm and low birth weight infants with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 6;8:CD009719. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009719.pub3. Review.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 3, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Enteral Feeding Intolerance

Clinical Trials on bolus/intermittant feeding

Subscribe