- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05272631
Depuy Synthes Lower Extremity Shaft Nail Registry
January 15, 2026 updated by: DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.
Depuy Synthes Lower Extremity Shaft Nail Registry (RFN-Advanced™ Retrograde Femoral Nailing System/ TN-Advanced™ Tibial Nailing System)
The purpose of this post-market registry is to monitor the clinical safety and performance (union rates and time to union) of two DePuy Synthes lower extremity shaft nails: RFN-Advanced Retrograde Femoral Nailing System (RFNA) and TN-Advanced Tibial Nailing System (TNA) in participants who have experienced femoral or tibial fractures, respectively, requiring fixation and stabilization or who require a revision due to a malunion or a nonunion.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
241
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46278
- Orthopedic Research Foundation, Inc
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
- Michigan Medicine; University of Michigan
-
-
Missouri
-
Columbia, Missouri, United States, 65211
- University of Missouri
-
-
North Carolina
-
Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
- Duke University
-
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
- Wake Forest Baptist Health
-
-
Oregon
-
Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
- Oregon Health and Science University
-
-
Tennessee
-
Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center
-
-
Texas
-
Fort Worth, Texas, United States, 76104
- JPS Health Network
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
12 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
The study population includes adults 22 years of age or older, (Retrograde Femoral Nail Advanced [RFNA], Tibial Nail Advanced [TNA]) or adolescents 12-21 years of age in which the growth plates have fused (TNA only) who will undergo surgery for fixation and stabilization of a tibia, femoral shaft or distal femur fracture, or who require a revision due to a malunion or a nonunion, with either the TNA (tibia) or RFNA (femoral shaft or distal femur).
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Skeletally mature adults age greater than or equal to (>=) 22 years (Retrograde Femoral Nail Advanced [RFNA], Tibial Nail Advanced [TNA]) and adolescents 12-21 years of age in which the growth plates have fused (TNA only)
- Participant receives an RFNA and/or TNA based on a diagnosis of open or closed, unilateral or bilateral femoral shaft or distal femur fracture (RFNA); unilateral or bilateral tibial fracture (TNA); revision of malunion or nonunion of previous fracture, or impending pathologic fracture (RFNA only) that will be treated operatively as part of standard of care. In addition, the following will be included: a) RFNA only: femoral shaft or distal femur fracture can be periprosthetic (PPFx) fracture after total or unicondylar knee arthroplasty, or total or hemi hip arthroplasty requiring nail osteosynthesis
- Participant (legally authorized representative if participant is a minor) voluntarily signs the Institutional Review Board (IRB)/ Ethics committee (EC) approved consent form
- Participant must be able to read and understand questions and responses in an available translated language for patient reported outcomes (PROs)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participation in any other medical device or medicinal product study within the previous month. Participation in observational studies is allowed
- In the opinion of the Principal Investigator, participant is unable to comply with the requirements of the Registry
- Participant has known allergies to implant components
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Retrograde Femoral Nail Advanced (RFNA) Cohort
Participants with a distal femur or femoral shaft fracture or who require revision due to a malunion or nonunion will undergo surgery with RFNA based on surgeon's decision and the site's standard of care (SOC).
Participants with impending pathologic fracture are also included.
|
No drug will be given as part of this study.
Participant will undergo surgery with RFNA based on the surgeon's decision and the site's SOC.
|
|
Tibial Nail Advanced (TNA) Cohort
Participants with open or closed, proximal, distal or shaft fractures of the tibia, or who require revision due to a malunion or nonunion will undergo surgery with TNA based on surgeon's decision and the site's SOC.
|
No drug will be given as part of this study.
Participant will undergo surgery with TNA based on the surgeon's decision and the site's SOC.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Union
Time Frame: Up to Week 56
|
Time to union will be reported.
Union is defined as a combination of radiographic and clinical assessment, where union will be considered achieved based on radiographic images, and no pain at the fracture site indicative of nonunion.
|
Up to Week 56
|
|
Number of Participants with Union (Healing)
Time Frame: Up to Week 56
|
Number of participants with union (healing) will be reported.
Union is defined as a combination of radiographic and clinical assessment, where union will be considered achieved based on radiographic images, and no pain at the fracture site indicative of nonunion.
|
Up to Week 56
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score
Time Frame: From Week 6 up to Week 52
|
The VAS is a 100 point one-dimensional line anchored on either end by verbal descriptors ranging from " 0=no pain" to "100=worst pain you can imagine".
The higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
|
From Week 6 up to Week 52
|
|
Short Form 12-Item Health Survey (SF-12) Questionnaire Score
Time Frame: From Week 6 up to Week 52
|
The SF-12 volume-2 is a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of twelve questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health.
Physical health-related domains include General Health (GH), Physical Functioning (PF), Role Physical (RP), and Body Pain (BP).
Mental health-related scales include Vitality (VT), Social Functioning (SF), Role Emotional (RE), and Mental Health (MH).
For each of the 8 domains, the questions are coded, added and transformed on a scale that ranges from 0 (the worst health status for that dimension) to 100 (the best health status).
|
From Week 6 up to Week 52
|
|
Quality of Life as Assessed by European Quality of Life (EuroQoL) 5-Dimensions 5-Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire Score: EQ-5D Descriptive System
Time Frame: From Week 6 up to Week 52
|
EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument that was designed for self-completion.
EQ-5D-5L consist of EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS).
The EQ-5D descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.
This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension.
The scores are applied to population-specific valuations of health states to result in a single index value.
The health index scores generally range from less than 0 to 1 with higher scores indicating higher health utility.
|
From Week 6 up to Week 52
|
|
Quality of Life as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire Score: EQ VAS
Time Frame: From Week 6 up to Week 52
|
EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument that was designed for self-completion.
EQ-5D-5L consist of EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ VAS.
The EQ VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale from 0 to 100, where 0 indicate 'The best health you can imagine' and 100 indicate 'The worst health you can imagine'.
|
From Week 6 up to Week 52
|
|
Weight Bearing Status
Time Frame: From Week 2 up to Week 52
|
Weight bearing status will be categorized as weight-bearing as tolerated (WBAT), limited weight-bearing up to half of the body weight, and no weight bearing.
|
From Week 2 up to Week 52
|
|
Mobility Assessment
Time Frame: Up to Week 56
|
Mobility assessment including ambulatory/unaided, ambulatory with cane, ambulatory with walker and nonambulatory will be reported.
|
Up to Week 56
|
|
Number of Participants with Revision Surgery
Time Frame: From Week 2 up to Week 52
|
Number of participants with revision surgery will be reported.
It includes the surgery following the index surgery that involves adjustment, modification, removal or replacement of the implanted device or other associated devices used to treat the fracture (nail, screws, endcaps, locking attachment washer [LAW] [Retrograde Femoral Nail Advanced {RFNA} only] or condylar nut and nut and screw washers [RFNA only]).
|
From Week 2 up to Week 52
|
|
Number of Participants with Reoperation
Time Frame: From Week 2 up to Week 52
|
Number of participants with reoperation will be reported.
It is defined as a second operation at the fracture site(s) after the index surgery that does not include adjustment, modification, removal or replacement of the implanted device.
|
From Week 2 up to Week 52
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Clinical Trial, DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Beak P, Moudhgalya S, Anderson T, Hing CB. Painful locking screws with tibial nailing, an underestimated complication. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Dec;29(8):1795-1799. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02501-8. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
- Byun SE, Shon HC, Park JH, Oh HK, Cho YH, Kim JW, Sim JA. Incidence and risk factors of knee injuries associated with ipsilateral femoral shaft fractures: A multicentre retrospective analysis of 429 femoral shaft injuries. Injury. 2018 Aug;49(8):1602-1606. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
- Capone A, Congia S, Civinini R, Marongiu G. Periprosthetic fractures: epidemiology and current treatment. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2017 May-Aug;14(2):189-196. doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2017.14.1.189. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
- Cereijo C, Attum B, Rodriguez-Buitrago A, Jahangir AA, Obremskey W. Intramedullary Nail Fixation of Tibial Shaft Fractures: Suprapatellar Approach. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2018 Sep 12;8(3):e24. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.17.00063. eCollection 2018 Sep 28.
- Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 2006 Aug;37(8):691-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130. Epub 2006 Jun 30.
- Court-Brown CM. The epidemiology of fractures and dislocations. In: Court-Brown CM, Heckman JD, Mcqueen MM, et al, eds. Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015:59-108
- EQ-5D-5L User Guide, EuroQol Research Foundation 2019; Version 3.0 Updated Sept. 2019
- Finkemeier, C et al. (2020a, August 30). RFN-Advanced Retrograde Femoral Nailing System. https://approvedsolutions.aofoundation.org/approvedsolutionsfolder/2020/rfn-advancedretrograde- femoral-nailing-system#tab=details TN- Advanced Tibial Nailing System https://approvedsolutions.aofoundation.org/approvedsolutionsfolder/2020/t -advanced-tibialnailing- system#tab=details;
- Finkemeier, C et al. (2020b, November 24) Advanced Nailing System. AO Innovations Magazine 2020. https://issuu.com/aofoundation/docs/aoe_tc_innovations_24_11_2020_final
- He GC, Wang HS, Wang QF, Chen ZH, Cai XH. Effect of minimally invasive percutaneous plates versus interlocking intramedullary nailing in tibial shaft treatment for fractures in adults: a meta-analysis. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2014;69(4):234-40. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2014(04)03.
- Lee C, Zoller SD, Perdue PW Jr, Nascone JW. Pearls and Pitfalls With Intramedullary Nailing of Proximal Tibia Fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Jan 15;28(2):66-73. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00765.
- Meena RC, Meena UK, Gupta GL, Gahlot N, Gaba S. Intramedullary nailing versus proximal plating in the management of closed extra-articular proximal tibial fracture: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Traumatol. 2015 Sep;16(3):203-8. doi: 10.1007/s10195-014-0332-9. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
- Oak SR, Strnad GJ, Bena J, Farrow LD, Parker RD, Jones MH, Spindler KP. Responsiveness Comparison of the EQ-5D, PROMIS Global Health, and VR-12 Questionnaires in Knee Arthroscopy. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Dec 17;4(12):2325967116674714. doi: 10.1177/2325967116674714. eCollection 2016 Dec.
- Rodriguez EK, Boulton C, Weaver MJ, Herder LM, Morgan JH, Chacko AT, Appleton PT, Zurakowski D, Vrahas MS. Predictive factors of distal femoral fracture nonunion after lateral locked plating: a retrospective multicenter case-control study of 283 fractures. Injury. 2014 Mar;45(3):554-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.042. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
- Yoon BH, Park IK, Kim Y, Oh HK, Choo SK, Sung YB. Incidence of nonunion after surgery of distal femoral fractures using contemporary fixation device: a meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Feb;141(2):225-233. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03463-x. Epub 2020 May 9.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
May 4, 2022
Primary Completion (Actual)
October 31, 2025
Study Completion (Actual)
October 31, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 28, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 28, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
March 9, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
January 16, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 15, 2026
Last Verified
January 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- DST202103 (Other Identifier: DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
Johnson & Johnson Medical Device Companies have an agreement with the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project to serve as the independent review panel for evaluation of requests for clinical study reports and participant level data from investigators and physicians for scientific research that will advance medical knowledge and public health.
Requests for access to the study data can be submitted through the YODA Project site at http://yoda.yale.edu
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Femoral Fractures
-
Gaziantep City HospitalCompletedFemoral Neck Fractures | Hip SurgeryTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedUnstable Intertrochanteric FractureEgypt
-
RegeneCure, Ltd.UnknownProximal (Subtrochanteric)Femoral Fractures | Distal Femoral FracturesIsrael
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityInnov8orthoWithdrawnFemoral Fracture | Femoral Neck Fractures | Intertrochanteric FracturesUnited States
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesNot yet recruitingArticular Fractures
-
Sundsvall HospitalCompletedFemoral Neck FractureSweden
-
Sundsvall HospitalCompletedHip Fracture | Femoral Neck Fracture | Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture
-
RenJi HospitalRecruiting
-
Sorlandet Hospital HFCompleted
-
Hartford HospitalZimmer BiometCompletedFemoral Neck FractureUnited States
Clinical Trials on Retrograde Femoral Nail Advanced
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamDePuy SynthesCompleted
-
Zimmer BiometRecruiting
-
University of California, San DiegoDePuy SynthesRecruitingFemoral FractureUnited States
-
Vestre Viken Hospital TrustRecruiting
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamSmith & Nephew, Inc.CompletedFemur FractureUnited States
-
Benha UniversityActive, not recruitingIntramedullary | Distal Femoral Fractures | Extra-articular Distal Radius MalunionsEgypt
-
Ilocos Training and Regional Medical CenterUnknownIntertrochanteric Fractures | Pertrochanteric Fracture | Pertrochanteric Fracture of Femur, Closed | Pertrochanteric Fracture of Femur, Open
-
AO Clinical Investigation and Publishing DocumentationSynthes Inc.CompletedUnstable Trochanteric FracturesSpain
-
Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical UniversityUnknownIntertrochanteric Femoral Fracture