Artemis Proximal Femoral Nail for Internal Fixation of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures

December 24, 2025 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

Pilot Evaluation: Artemis Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) for Internal Fixation of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures

In February 2021, Altior Trauma Innovations™ announced that it had received 501(k) FDA approval for the Artemis Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) System for internal fixation of intertrochanteric femur fractures. The objective of this pilot study is to evaluate safety, efficacy and feasibility of the Artemis PFN implant for operative fixation of intertrochanteric femoral fractures, compared to matched historical control patients who received other implants.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Intertrochanteric femur fractures are a common injury pattern seen after acute hip trauma, with a very high rate of morbidity and mortality particularly among elderly patients. Cephalomedullary nail fixation has become a mainstay of treatment for both stable and unstable intertrochanteric fractures, offering greater stability than other options without replacing the native hip joint when possible. Despite this, the incidence of fracture nonunion remains high, resulting in poor functional outcomes, higher healthcare costs, and conversion to hemi- or total hip arthroplasty.

In February 2021, Altior Trauma Innovations™ announced that it had received 501(k) FDA approval for the Artemis Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) System for internal fixation of intertrochanteric femur fractures. The Artemis PFN implant offers several purported advantages over existing implants. It is manufactured with a titanium core coated with carbon-fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone (PEEK), combining the strength of titanium with the bone-imitating biomechanical properties and radiolucency of PEEK. A number of additional features built into the Artemis System are designed to facilitate lower-complexity assembly/insertion, as well as reduce the likelihood of implant failure.

The objective of this pilot study is to evaluate safety, efficacy and feasibility of the Artemis PFN implant for operative fixation of intertrochanteric femoral fractures, compared to matched historical control patients who received other implants.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21244
        • Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients with traumatic, non-pathologic stable intertrochanteric fractures requiring cephalomedullary nail fixation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pediatric patients (<18 years)
  • Pregnant females
  • Patients with other concomitant orthopaedic injuries

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Artemis Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) implant
All participants will receive the Artemis Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) implant.
Artemis Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) implant

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Rate of fracture nonunion
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Up to 6 months
Rate of implant-related failure
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Up to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Preoperative pain as assessed by a visual analog scale
Time Frame: 30 days preoperatively
Visual Analog Scale: 1(least pain) - 10(most pain).
30 days preoperatively
Preoperative function as assessed by the Functional Independence Measure
Time Frame: 30 days preoperatively
Functional Independence Measure: 1(total functional dependence) - 7(total functional independence).
30 days preoperatively
Operative duration
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Operative duration in minutes.
Intraoperative
Fluoroscopy usage time
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Fluoroscopy usage time in minutes.
Intraoperative
Estimated blood loss
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Estimated blood loss in milliliters (mL).
Intraoperative
Duration of hospital stay
Time Frame: Perioperative, up to 6 months post procedure
Duration of hospital stay in days.
Perioperative, up to 6 months post procedure
Discharge disposition
Time Frame: Perioperative, up to 6 months post procedure
Discharge to home vs. rehab facility
Perioperative, up to 6 months post procedure
Postoperative complications
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Any postoperative complications, including: infection, hematoma, thrombosis/embolism, delayed wound healing, etc.
Up to 6 months
Postoperative pain as assessed by a visual analog scale
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Visual Analog Scale: 1(least pain) - 10(most pain).
Up to 6 months
Postoperative function as assessed by the Functional Independence Measure
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Functional Independence Measure: 1(total functional dependence) - 7(total functional independence).
Up to 6 months
Use of gait-aid device
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Use of gait-aid device (wheelchair, walker, cane).
Up to 6 months
Postoperative radiographic healing
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Fracture healing, position of implant, implant-related failure (subsidence, cutout, loosening, implant fracture).
Up to 6 months
Financial costs
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Implant purchase/manufacturing costs.
Intraoperative
Environmental costs
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Carbon waste footprint.
Intraoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amiethab Aiyer, MD, Johns Hopkins University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 24, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 29, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 31, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Femoral Fracture

Clinical Trials on Artemis Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) implant

Subscribe