- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05273164
State Representation in Early Psychosis (STEP)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Participants will be asked to complete two sets of appointments six months apart. During both sets of appointments, participants will be asked to complete interviews examining behaviors and symptoms of mental health conditions, self-report questionnaires, and a neurocognitive assessment. In addition, participants will complete an imaging appointment, in which they will receive simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) while performing two computerized tasks.
The purpose of this study is to determine how differences in information processing that support state representation in neural circuits relate to clinical heterogeneity in early psychosis. To this end, the investigators will: (a) Recruit people with early psychosis and demographically similar adults without a psychiatric illness aged 15-45 years; (b) Determine test-retest reliability of variants of the Dot Pattern Expectancy (DPX) and Bandit tasks as assessments of state representation processes; (c) Characterize behavioral performance and neurophysiology at baseline using the DPX and Bandit task variants during simultaneous EEG-fMRI along with other MRI modalities; (d) Follow patients for 6 months while they receive usual care, to delineate their clinical trajectories; (e) Repeat the behavioral and EEG-fMRI assessments after six months. The data the investigators acquire will allow us to examine the baseline relationships between clinical and experimental measures, and also to investigate how changes in clinical and experimental measures are related over a 6-month time period during a critical phase of illness.
Participants in this protocol will be invited to participate in a follow on study, NCT05664594.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Minnesota
-
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55454
- University of Minnesota
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- English proficiency, as determined by staff observation and participant self-report
- Estimated IQ at or above 70, as estimated by the cognitive assessments
Additional Inclusion Criteria for Early Psychosis Participants:
- Clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, schizophreniform disorder, psychosis NOS, bipolar disorder with psychosis, or major depressive disorder with psychosis; those aged 36-45 years old must have had with onset of psychotic symptoms within the previous 5 years
- Achieved clinical stability, defined as outpatient status for at least one month prior to study participation
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
- The participant is unable to demonstrate adequate decisional capacity, in the judgment of the consenting study staff member, to make a choice about participating in the research study
- Participant is pregnant
- Participant is illiterate
- Cannot pass the CMRR Subject Safety Screen due to MRI contraindications
- Presence of a major neurological disorder (psychosis participants may have an autism spectrum diagnosis)
- Previous clinically significant head injury or prolonged unconsciousness, as determined by the PI/Co-Is
- Meets criteria for substance or alcohol dependence within 3 months of enrollment
- The presence of any major medical condition that, in the opinion of the PI/Co-Is, would impede participation in the study or would put the participant at additional risk by participating
- Presence of severe alcohol or substance abuse
- Has participated in significant formal cognitive training programs, as determined by the PI/Co-Is
Additional Exclusion Criteria for Early Psychosis Participants:
- Meets criteria for clinical risk of suicidal behavior, as defined by:
- Clinician judgement
- A suicide attempt within 6 months of enrollment
- Active suicidal ideation at screening or baseline, as indicated by the C-SSRS
- Previous intent to act on suicidal ideation with a specific plan and/or preparatory acts within 6 months of enrollment, as indicated by the C-SSRS
Additional Exclusion Criteria for Control Participants:
- Meets DSM-5 criteria for psychotic, bipolar, or autism spectrum disorder
- Has a family history (1st degree relative) of psychotic, bipolar, or autism spectrum disorder
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
Early Psychosis participants
Individuals who have been diagnosed with a psychosis spectrum illness, such as schizophrenia, and are in the early stages of the disease (i.e., aged 15-35, or if 36-45, has had the onset of psychotic symptoms within the last 5 years)
|
|
Healthy Controls
Demographically matched participants who do not have a personal or immediate family history of psychosis spectrum illnesses.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Performance of Dot Pattern Expectancy (DPX) Task Variant
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
The DPX task variant consists of a series of pattern sequences.
One pattern is designated the "A" cue, and another the "X" cue, which requires one response (AX, 60-70% of trials, e.g.
respond with the left button), while other sequences require a different response (AY or BX, 12-15% of trials each, or BY, 6-10% of trials, e.g.
respond with the right button).
Given the strong expectation that X's evokes a valid response, BX trials place demands on the fidelity (stability, memory) of the "B" cue state representation to overcome this tendency.
Performance is assessed based on accuracy and response time.
|
Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
|
Change in Performance of Bandit Task Variant
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
This is a task variant that uses choice options (neutral images) that are rewarded probabilistically.
The rewarded stimulus with the highest reward is changed over time.
State learning associated with staying or switching stimuli too quickly (lose-switching) can be evaluated.
Performance is based on accuracy, response time, and behavior of reward seeking.
|
Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
|
Change in Test My Brain Neurocognitive Assessment performance: Global Cognition Z Score.
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
The investigators will examine global cognition scores from the Test My Brain neurocognitive battery.
Z scores range from -5 to 5, with higher score indicating increased cognitive functioning.
|
Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
|
Change in EEG Variables
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
Analysis will examine variables including phase synchrony, slope of the spectral power density (indexing E-I balance), and prefrontal/parietal theta as a measure of perceptual noise.
|
Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
|
Change in MRI Variables
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
MRI assessments will include structural MRI, Diffusion-weighted MRI, Resting State fMRI.
|
Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in symptoms and functioning as indicated by Minnesota Symptom Severity Scale
Time Frame: Baseline,6 month follow up
|
This 29-item measure assesses symptoms in several domains such as anxiety, depression, sleep problems, somatic symptoms, and substance use.
Scores range from 0 to 116, with a higher score indicating greater symptom severity.
|
Baseline,6 month follow up
|
|
Change in symptoms and functioning as indicated by the SANS/SAPS
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
The Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS, 25 items) and Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS, 34 items) assess negative and positive symptoms of schizophrenia in a standardized interview.
Scores on the SANS ranges from 0-125, and the SANS ranges from 0-170, with higher scores indicating increased symptom severity.
|
Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
|
Change in symptoms and functioning as indicated by the BPRS
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale is a 24-item interview which assesses psychiatric symptoms.
Scores on the BPRS rang from 24-168, with a higher score indicating increased symptom severity.
|
Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
|
Change in symptoms and functioning as indicated by the SPQ-BR
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire Brief Revised, a 32-item measure to assess a broad array of schizotypal symptoms and signs.
The SPQ ranges from 32-160, with a higher score indicating greater schizotypy.
|
Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
|
Change in symptoms and functioning as indicated by the SGI
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
The Sensory Gating Inventory Brief is a 10-item measure assesses an individual's subjective ability to modulate, filter, over-include, discriminate, attend to, and tolerate sensory stimuli.
The SGI ranges from 10-60, with higher score indicating increased perceptual abnormalities.
|
Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
|
Change in symptoms and functioning as indicated by the IDI
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
The Intersectional Discrimination Index is a 31-item measure assesses anticipated, day to day, and major discrimination experienced by the participant.
Scores range from 0-136, with higher scores indicating greater discrimination experienced by the individual.
|
Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
|
Change in symptoms and functioning as indicated by the WHODAS 2.0 Brief
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule is a 12-item self-administered scale measuring disability and functional impairment.
The WHODAS ranges in score from 12-60, with a higher score indicating increased disability.
|
Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
|
Change in symptoms and functioning as indicated by the GFS/GFR
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
The Global Functioning Social/Global Functioning Role scales provide a rating on a scale from 1-10 for social functioning and for role functioning, with higher scores indicating increased functioning.
|
Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
|
Change in Test My Brain Neurocognitive Assessment performance: Digit Symbol Matching Z Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
This subdomain of the TMB battery assesses processing speed.
Z scores range from -5 to 5, with higher score indicating increased functioning.
|
Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
|
Change in Test My Brain Neurocognitive Assessment performance: Verbal Pair Associates Memory Z Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
This subdomain of the TMB battery assesses verbal learning.
Z scores range from -5 to 5, with higher score indicating increased functioning.
|
Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
|
Change in Test My Brain Neurocognitive Assessment performance: Matrix Reasoning Z Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
This subdomain of the TMB battery assesses reasoning skills and also provides an IQ estimate.
Z scores range from -5 to 5, with higher score indicating increased functioning.
|
Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
|
Change in Test My Brain Neurocognitive Assessment performance: Multiracial Emotion Identification Z Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
This subdomain of the TMB battery is a social cognition test that assesses the ability to recognize emotions (happiness, sadness, anger, and fear).
Z scores range from -5 to 5, with higher score indicating increased functioning.
|
Baseline, 6 month follow up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Angus MacDonald III, Ph.D., University of Minnesota
- Principal Investigator: Sophia Vinogradov, MD, University of Minnesota
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00009964
- 5P50MH119569 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.