State Representation in Early Psychosis (STEP)

September 16, 2025 updated by: Sophia Vinogradov, University of Minnesota
The purpose of this study is to examine state representation in individuals aged 15-45 who have been diagnosed with a psychotic illness, as well as young adults who do not have a psychiatric diagnosis. State Representation is our ability to process information about our surroundings. Participants will complete computerized tasks that measure state representation while having their brain activity measured.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Participants will be asked to complete two sets of appointments six months apart. During both sets of appointments, participants will be asked to complete interviews examining behaviors and symptoms of mental health conditions, self-report questionnaires, and a neurocognitive assessment. In addition, participants will complete an imaging appointment, in which they will receive simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) while performing two computerized tasks.

The purpose of this study is to determine how differences in information processing that support state representation in neural circuits relate to clinical heterogeneity in early psychosis. To this end, the investigators will: (a) Recruit people with early psychosis and demographically similar adults without a psychiatric illness aged 15-45 years; (b) Determine test-retest reliability of variants of the Dot Pattern Expectancy (DPX) and Bandit tasks as assessments of state representation processes; (c) Characterize behavioral performance and neurophysiology at baseline using the DPX and Bandit task variants during simultaneous EEG-fMRI along with other MRI modalities; (d) Follow patients for 6 months while they receive usual care, to delineate their clinical trajectories; (e) Repeat the behavioral and EEG-fMRI assessments after six months. The data the investigators acquire will allow us to examine the baseline relationships between clinical and experimental measures, and also to investigate how changes in clinical and experimental measures are related over a 6-month time period during a critical phase of illness.

Participants in this protocol will be invited to participate in a follow on study, NCT05664594.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

277

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55454
        • University of Minnesota

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 40 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants are recruited from Minnesota. Most participants are located in the Twin Cities Metro area.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English proficiency, as determined by staff observation and participant self-report
  • Estimated IQ at or above 70, as estimated by the cognitive assessments

Additional Inclusion Criteria for Early Psychosis Participants:

  • Clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, schizophreniform disorder, psychosis NOS, bipolar disorder with psychosis, or major depressive disorder with psychosis; those aged 36-45 years old must have had with onset of psychotic symptoms within the previous 5 years
  • Achieved clinical stability, defined as outpatient status for at least one month prior to study participation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
  • The participant is unable to demonstrate adequate decisional capacity, in the judgment of the consenting study staff member, to make a choice about participating in the research study
  • Participant is pregnant
  • Participant is illiterate
  • Cannot pass the CMRR Subject Safety Screen due to MRI contraindications
  • Presence of a major neurological disorder (psychosis participants may have an autism spectrum diagnosis)
  • Previous clinically significant head injury or prolonged unconsciousness, as determined by the PI/Co-Is
  • Meets criteria for substance or alcohol dependence within 3 months of enrollment
  • The presence of any major medical condition that, in the opinion of the PI/Co-Is, would impede participation in the study or would put the participant at additional risk by participating
  • Presence of severe alcohol or substance abuse
  • Has participated in significant formal cognitive training programs, as determined by the PI/Co-Is

Additional Exclusion Criteria for Early Psychosis Participants:

  • Meets criteria for clinical risk of suicidal behavior, as defined by:
  • Clinician judgement
  • A suicide attempt within 6 months of enrollment
  • Active suicidal ideation at screening or baseline, as indicated by the C-SSRS
  • Previous intent to act on suicidal ideation with a specific plan and/or preparatory acts within 6 months of enrollment, as indicated by the C-SSRS

Additional Exclusion Criteria for Control Participants:

  • Meets DSM-5 criteria for psychotic, bipolar, or autism spectrum disorder
  • Has a family history (1st degree relative) of psychotic, bipolar, or autism spectrum disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Early Psychosis participants
Individuals who have been diagnosed with a psychosis spectrum illness, such as schizophrenia, and are in the early stages of the disease (i.e., aged 15-35, or if 36-45, has had the onset of psychotic symptoms within the last 5 years)
Healthy Controls
Demographically matched participants who do not have a personal or immediate family history of psychosis spectrum illnesses.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Performance of Dot Pattern Expectancy (DPX) Task Variant
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
The DPX task variant consists of a series of pattern sequences. One pattern is designated the "A" cue, and another the "X" cue, which requires one response (AX, 60-70% of trials, e.g. respond with the left button), while other sequences require a different response (AY or BX, 12-15% of trials each, or BY, 6-10% of trials, e.g. respond with the right button). Given the strong expectation that X's evokes a valid response, BX trials place demands on the fidelity (stability, memory) of the "B" cue state representation to overcome this tendency. Performance is assessed based on accuracy and response time.
Baseline, 6 month follow up
Change in Performance of Bandit Task Variant
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
This is a task variant that uses choice options (neutral images) that are rewarded probabilistically. The rewarded stimulus with the highest reward is changed over time. State learning associated with staying or switching stimuli too quickly (lose-switching) can be evaluated. Performance is based on accuracy, response time, and behavior of reward seeking.
Baseline, 6 month follow up
Change in Test My Brain Neurocognitive Assessment performance: Global Cognition Z Score.
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
The investigators will examine global cognition scores from the Test My Brain neurocognitive battery. Z scores range from -5 to 5, with higher score indicating increased cognitive functioning.
Baseline, 6 month follow up
Change in EEG Variables
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
Analysis will examine variables including phase synchrony, slope of the spectral power density (indexing E-I balance), and prefrontal/parietal theta as a measure of perceptual noise.
Baseline, 6 month follow up
Change in MRI Variables
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
MRI assessments will include structural MRI, Diffusion-weighted MRI, Resting State fMRI.
Baseline, 6 month follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in symptoms and functioning as indicated by Minnesota Symptom Severity Scale
Time Frame: Baseline,6 month follow up
This 29-item measure assesses symptoms in several domains such as anxiety, depression, sleep problems, somatic symptoms, and substance use. Scores range from 0 to 116, with a higher score indicating greater symptom severity.
Baseline,6 month follow up
Change in symptoms and functioning as indicated by the SANS/SAPS
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
The Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS, 25 items) and Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS, 34 items) assess negative and positive symptoms of schizophrenia in a standardized interview. Scores on the SANS ranges from 0-125, and the SANS ranges from 0-170, with higher scores indicating increased symptom severity.
Baseline, 6 month follow up
Change in symptoms and functioning as indicated by the BPRS
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale is a 24-item interview which assesses psychiatric symptoms. Scores on the BPRS rang from 24-168, with a higher score indicating increased symptom severity.
Baseline, 6 month follow up
Change in symptoms and functioning as indicated by the SPQ-BR
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire Brief Revised, a 32-item measure to assess a broad array of schizotypal symptoms and signs. The SPQ ranges from 32-160, with a higher score indicating greater schizotypy.
Baseline, 6 month follow up
Change in symptoms and functioning as indicated by the SGI
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
The Sensory Gating Inventory Brief is a 10-item measure assesses an individual's subjective ability to modulate, filter, over-include, discriminate, attend to, and tolerate sensory stimuli. The SGI ranges from 10-60, with higher score indicating increased perceptual abnormalities.
Baseline, 6 month follow up
Change in symptoms and functioning as indicated by the IDI
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
The Intersectional Discrimination Index is a 31-item measure assesses anticipated, day to day, and major discrimination experienced by the participant. Scores range from 0-136, with higher scores indicating greater discrimination experienced by the individual.
Baseline, 6 month follow up
Change in symptoms and functioning as indicated by the WHODAS 2.0 Brief
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule is a 12-item self-administered scale measuring disability and functional impairment. The WHODAS ranges in score from 12-60, with a higher score indicating increased disability.
Baseline, 6 month follow up
Change in symptoms and functioning as indicated by the GFS/GFR
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
The Global Functioning Social/Global Functioning Role scales provide a rating on a scale from 1-10 for social functioning and for role functioning, with higher scores indicating increased functioning.
Baseline, 6 month follow up
Change in Test My Brain Neurocognitive Assessment performance: Digit Symbol Matching Z Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
This subdomain of the TMB battery assesses processing speed. Z scores range from -5 to 5, with higher score indicating increased functioning.
Baseline, 6 month follow up
Change in Test My Brain Neurocognitive Assessment performance: Verbal Pair Associates Memory Z Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
This subdomain of the TMB battery assesses verbal learning. Z scores range from -5 to 5, with higher score indicating increased functioning.
Baseline, 6 month follow up
Change in Test My Brain Neurocognitive Assessment performance: Matrix Reasoning Z Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
This subdomain of the TMB battery assesses reasoning skills and also provides an IQ estimate. Z scores range from -5 to 5, with higher score indicating increased functioning.
Baseline, 6 month follow up
Change in Test My Brain Neurocognitive Assessment performance: Multiracial Emotion Identification Z Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up
This subdomain of the TMB battery is a social cognition test that assesses the ability to recognize emotions (happiness, sadness, anger, and fear). Z scores range from -5 to 5, with higher score indicating increased functioning.
Baseline, 6 month follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Angus MacDonald III, Ph.D., University of Minnesota
  • Principal Investigator: Sophia Vinogradov, MD, University of Minnesota

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 29, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

August 29, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY00009964
  • 5P50MH119569 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

This data is shared with the NIMH Data Archive, Collection ID C3504, and will include demographics, imaging data, and primary and secondary outcome data.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will become available 12 months after the completion of this study.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access will be provided to users who have an account with the NIMH Data Archive and who request permission through a Data Access Request.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe