Non-surgical Electrolytic Cleaning Peri-implantitis

June 8, 2022 updated by: Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Non-surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis With Electrolytic Cleaning: a Pilot Study

Electrolytic cleaning is a promising treatment for dental implant decontamination, but this mode of therapy has not yet been clinically tested as an adjunct to the non-surgical treatment of periimplantitis.

A prospective clinical and radiographic case series study will be performed to evaluate the clinical performance of the adjunctive use of electrolytic cleaning as an adjunct to a non-surgical therapy protocol that includes curettage of the peri-implant soft tissue. This is study is a proof of principle study, thus, a case series study is selected to start with. If the results of this case series study are favourable, a future study with a clinical trial design is then planned to do.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Electrolytic cleaning is a promising treatment for dental implant decontamination, but this mode of therapy has not yet been clinically tested as an adjunct to the non-surgical treatment of periimplantitis. Electrolytic cleaning is a promising treatment for dental implant decontamination, but this mode of therapy has not yet been clinically tested as an adjunct to the non-surgical treatment of periimplantitis.This is study is a proof of principle study, thus, a case series study is selected to start with. As this is a pilot study to test for the first time the electrolytic cleaning under non-surgical therapy, the sample size has been estimated in a minimum of 25 patients. If the results of this case series study are favourable, a future study with a clinical trial design is then planned to do.

Therapeutic success is defined as as a composite index (Sanz & Chapple 2012 criteria of disease resolution) that includes: (1) probing pocket depth < 5 mm, (2) no bleeding on probing/suppuration and (3) no additional bone loss, at 6 and 12 months). Secondary objectives are: Changes in the clinical outcomes measurements.Changes in the radiological outcomes measurements. Changes in the patient-reported outcomes (PROMs). Evaluation of the outcomes related to the prosthetic restoration.

This study will be carried out in the following centers:

  • Postgraduate Periodontal Clinic at the Faculty of Odontology-Universidad Complutense of Madrid (Spain)
  • CEOSA-Madrid Private Dental Centre

After the non-surgical therapy, patients will be recalled for control visits, with supra- gingival removal of biofilm with air polishing without anaesthesia at:

  • 3 months.
  • 6 months.
  • 12 months. After non-surgical therapy, patients will be included in a strict peri-implant maintenance therapy program to avoid re-contamination of the affected implants. Removal of biofilm with air polishing without anaesthesia and oral hygiene instruction reinforcement will be performed at: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Ana Carillo de Albornoz Sainz
  • Phone Number: +34627588248
  • Email: acarill02@ucm.es

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female age > 18 years.
  • Presence of at least 1 implant with the diagnose of peri-implantitis (Berglundh et al. 2018; Renvert et al. 2018)
  • Peri-implant bone loss < 2/3
  • History of treated periodontal diseases (Caton 2018).
  • Screw retained prosthesis that can be easily unscrewed.
  • Prosthesis that allows access to biofilm control by the patient, or which can be modified accordingly.
  • Absence of implant mobility

Exclusion Criteria:

Systemic exclusion criteria

  • Pregnant or lactating women Non-surgical electrolytic cleaning CONFIDENTIAL
  • Patients chronically treated (i.e., two weeks or more) with any medication known to affect periodontal/peri-implant status (i.e., antibiotics intake within 3 months prior to the initiation)
  • Medical conditions requiring prolonged use of steroids and/or with medications that could interfere with bone metabolism.
  • History of leukocyte dysfunction and deficiencies.
  • History of neoplastic disease requiring the use of radiation or chemotherapy.
  • Patients with chronic renal failure requiring dialysis.
  • Patients with metabolic bone disorders such as osteoporosis treated with antiresoptive medications.
  • History of uncontrolled endocrine disorders: hypothyroidism or diabetes.
  • Physical handicaps that would interfere with the ability to perform adequate oral hygiene or patients unable to use daily interproximal cleaning.
  • Alcoholism or drug abuse.
  • History of immunodeficiency syndromes.
  • Tobacco consumption (smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day)
  • Conditions or circumstances, which in the opinion of the investigator, would avoid the completion of study participation, or interfere with analysis of study results, such as history of non-compliance or unreliability, or do have any additional medical condition that contraindicates non-surgical treatment

Local exclusion criteria

  • Mucosal diseases such as erosive lichen planus in the area to be treated.
  • History of local irradiation therapy.
  • Implants with peri-implant bone loss beyond 2/3 of the implant length

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Non-surgical electrolytic cleaning
  • Implant hygiene instructions and removal of the prosthesis
  • Local anaesthesia
  • Removal of the granulation tissue and mucosa and bone defect curettage with a steel curette 4R/4L (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA)
  • Removal of supra and submucosal calculus with slim ultrasonic devices (Piezon PS instrument EMS; Nyon, Swiss).
  • Erythritol air powder-spray system (Air-flow ® master piezon, EMS, Nyon swiss) implant surface treatment. This will be performed by separating the soft tissue with the aim of a periodontal probe (CP 15, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA).
  • Electrolytic cleaning of the implant surface following manufacturer's instructions (GalvoSurge Dental AG, Widnau, Switzerland), with the help of a non-metal periodontal probe to separate the soft tissues and aim the implant surface in all its length.
  • Antibiotic treatment (Metronidazole 500 mg, every day/ 7 day).
  • If necessary, modification and polishing of the prosthesis to make it cleanable.
Verbal instructions on implant hygiene practices and removal of the implant supported prosthesis
Removal of the granulation tissue and mucosa and bone defect curettage with a steel curette 4R/4L (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) after applying local anestesia
Removal of supra and submucosal calculus with slim ultrasonic devices (Piezon PS instrument EMS; Nyon, Swiss).
Erythritol air powder-spray system (Air-flow ® master piezon, EMS, Nyon swiss) implant surface treatment. This will be performed by separating the soft tissue with the aim of a periodontal probe (CP 15, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA).
Electrolytic cleaning of the implant surface following manufacturer's instructions (GalvoSurge Dental AG, Widnau, Switzerland), with the help of a non-metal periodontal probe to separate the soft tissues and aim the implant surface in all its length.
Antibiotic treatment (Metronidazole 500 mg, every day/ 7 day).
Other Names:
  • Metronidazole
If necessary, modification and polishing of the prosthesis to make it cleanable.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Peri-implant disease resolution at 6 month
Time Frame: 6 months
Probing depth < 5 mm, with absence of bleeding or suppuration and no additional bone loss (Sanz & Chapple 2012)
6 months
Peri-implant disease resolution at 12 month
Time Frame: 12 months
Probing depth < 5 mm, with absence of bleeding or suppuration and no additional
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implant survival rate at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
Survival of installed implants as defined by Misch et al., 2007: presence in the mouth, no mobility, no pain upon function, radiographic bone loss less than 1⁄2, no uncontrolled infection.
6 months
Implant survival rate at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Survival of installed implants as defined by Misch et al., 2007: presence in the mouth, no mobility, no pain upon function, radiographic bone loss less than 1⁄2, no uncontrolled infection.
12 months
Implant plaque index at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
Implant plaque index (PI) (at 6 sites/implant)(+/-).
6 months
Implant plaque index at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Implant plaque index (PI) (at 6 sites/implant)(+/-).
12 months
Peri-implant probing depth at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
Peri-implant probing depth (PD) (at 6 sites/implant) recorded using a CPC-15 periodontal probe at 6 sites/implant (Hu-Friedy, Leinmen, Germany).
6 months
Peri-implant probing depth at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Peri-implant probing depth (PD) (at 6 sites/implant) recorded using a CPC-15 periodontal probe at 6 sites/implant (Hu-Friedy, Leinmen, Germany).
12 months
Bleeding on probing at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
Bleeding on probing (BOP) from the peri-implant mucosa (measured at 6 sites/implant) (+/-).
6 months
Bleeding on probing at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Bleeding on probing (BOP) from the peri-implant mucosa (measured at 6 sites/implant) (+/-).
12 months
Suppuration at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
Presence or absence of suppuration from the peri-implant mucosa (measured at 6 sites/implant) (+/-) nice, regular, unpleasant, very unpleasant).
6 months
Suppuration at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Presence or absence of suppuration from the peri-implant mucosa (measured at 6 sites/implant) (+/-)
12 months
Recession of the mucosal margin at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
Recession of the mucosal margin, keratinized mucosa (at 6 sites/implant) (+/-).recorded using a CPC-15 periodontal probe at 6 sites/implant (Hu-Friedy, Leinmen, Germany).
6 months
Recession of the mucosal margin at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Recession of the mucosal margin, keratinized mucosa (at 6 sites/implant) (+/-).recorded using a CPC-15 periodontal probe at 6 sites/implant (Hu-Friedy, Leinmen, Germany).
12 months
Bone loss at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months

Distance between bone crest and implant shoulder at mesial and distal site. For standardization of the periapical radiographs the same film holder-beam aiming device will be applied to each treated implant (i.e. Rinn System, RWT window x-ray system or Non-surgical electrolytic cleaning CONFIDENTIAL similar). The radiographs will be taken with the film placed parallel to the implants and the x-ray beam directed perpendicular to the implants. The quality/contrast should be good enough to clearly identify the complete implant and its essential structures.

Digital radiographs will be evaluated using a software (OsiriX Imaging Software, Pixmeo, Geneva, Switzerland) calibrating the distances with implant wide and length.

6 months
Bone loss at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months

Distance between bone crest and implant shoulder at mesial and distal site. For standardization of the periapical radiographs the same film holder-beam aiming device will be applied to each treated implant (i.e. Rinn System, RWT window x-ray system or Non-surgical electrolytic cleaning CONFIDENTIAL similar). The radiographs will be taken with the film placed parallel to the implants and the x-ray beam directed perpendicular to the implants. The quality/contrast should be good enough to clearly identify the complete implant and its essential structures.

Digital radiographs will be evaluated using a software (OsiriX Imaging Software, Pixmeo, Geneva, Switzerland) calibrating the distances with implant wide and length.

12 months
Patient centred outcomes of the electrolytic cleaning after 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
Patient centred outcomes of the electrolytic cleaning with a 5 options semi-quantitative scale (very nice, nice, regular, unpleasant, very unpleasant).
6 months
Patient centred outcomes of the electrolytic cleaning after 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Patient centred outcomes of the electrolytic cleaning with a 5 options semi-quantitative scale (very nice, nice, regular, unpleasant, very unpleasant).
12 months
Overall satisfaction after 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
Overall satisfaction on a 5 options semi-quantitative scale (very nice, nice, regular, unpleasant, very unpleasant).
6 months
Overall satisfaction after 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Overall satisfaction on a 5 options semi-quantitative scale (very nice, nice, regular, unpleasant, very unpleasant).
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mariano Sanz Alonso, University Complutense Madrid

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

July 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 11, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 9, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peri-Implantitis

Clinical Trials on Implant hygiene instructions and removal of the prosthesis

Subscribe