- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05275894
Non-surgical Electrolytic Cleaning Peri-implantitis
Non-surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis With Electrolytic Cleaning: a Pilot Study
Electrolytic cleaning is a promising treatment for dental implant decontamination, but this mode of therapy has not yet been clinically tested as an adjunct to the non-surgical treatment of periimplantitis.
A prospective clinical and radiographic case series study will be performed to evaluate the clinical performance of the adjunctive use of electrolytic cleaning as an adjunct to a non-surgical therapy protocol that includes curettage of the peri-implant soft tissue. This is study is a proof of principle study, thus, a case series study is selected to start with. If the results of this case series study are favourable, a future study with a clinical trial design is then planned to do.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
- Behavioral: Implant hygiene instructions and removal of the prosthesis
- Procedure: Non-surgical peri-implantitis treatment /microsurgery
- Procedure: Implant surface decontamination 1(ultrasonic device)
- Procedure: Implant surface decontamination 2 (air polishing)
- Procedure: Implant surface decontamination 3 (electrolytic cleaning)
- Drug: Antibiotic treatment (Metronidazole)
- Procedure: Modification and polishing of the prosthesis
Detailed Description
Electrolytic cleaning is a promising treatment for dental implant decontamination, but this mode of therapy has not yet been clinically tested as an adjunct to the non-surgical treatment of periimplantitis. Electrolytic cleaning is a promising treatment for dental implant decontamination, but this mode of therapy has not yet been clinically tested as an adjunct to the non-surgical treatment of periimplantitis.This is study is a proof of principle study, thus, a case series study is selected to start with. As this is a pilot study to test for the first time the electrolytic cleaning under non-surgical therapy, the sample size has been estimated in a minimum of 25 patients. If the results of this case series study are favourable, a future study with a clinical trial design is then planned to do.
Therapeutic success is defined as as a composite index (Sanz & Chapple 2012 criteria of disease resolution) that includes: (1) probing pocket depth < 5 mm, (2) no bleeding on probing/suppuration and (3) no additional bone loss, at 6 and 12 months). Secondary objectives are: Changes in the clinical outcomes measurements.Changes in the radiological outcomes measurements. Changes in the patient-reported outcomes (PROMs). Evaluation of the outcomes related to the prosthetic restoration.
This study will be carried out in the following centers:
- Postgraduate Periodontal Clinic at the Faculty of Odontology-Universidad Complutense of Madrid (Spain)
- CEOSA-Madrid Private Dental Centre
After the non-surgical therapy, patients will be recalled for control visits, with supra- gingival removal of biofilm with air polishing without anaesthesia at:
- 3 months.
- 6 months.
- 12 months. After non-surgical therapy, patients will be included in a strict peri-implant maintenance therapy program to avoid re-contamination of the affected implants. Removal of biofilm with air polishing without anaesthesia and oral hygiene instruction reinforcement will be performed at: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Ana Carillo de Albornoz Sainz
- Phone Number: +34627588248
- Email: acarill02@ucm.es
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female age > 18 years.
- Presence of at least 1 implant with the diagnose of peri-implantitis (Berglundh et al. 2018; Renvert et al. 2018)
- Peri-implant bone loss < 2/3
- History of treated periodontal diseases (Caton 2018).
- Screw retained prosthesis that can be easily unscrewed.
- Prosthesis that allows access to biofilm control by the patient, or which can be modified accordingly.
- Absence of implant mobility
Exclusion Criteria:
Systemic exclusion criteria
- Pregnant or lactating women Non-surgical electrolytic cleaning CONFIDENTIAL
- Patients chronically treated (i.e., two weeks or more) with any medication known to affect periodontal/peri-implant status (i.e., antibiotics intake within 3 months prior to the initiation)
- Medical conditions requiring prolonged use of steroids and/or with medications that could interfere with bone metabolism.
- History of leukocyte dysfunction and deficiencies.
- History of neoplastic disease requiring the use of radiation or chemotherapy.
- Patients with chronic renal failure requiring dialysis.
- Patients with metabolic bone disorders such as osteoporosis treated with antiresoptive medications.
- History of uncontrolled endocrine disorders: hypothyroidism or diabetes.
- Physical handicaps that would interfere with the ability to perform adequate oral hygiene or patients unable to use daily interproximal cleaning.
- Alcoholism or drug abuse.
- History of immunodeficiency syndromes.
- Tobacco consumption (smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day)
- Conditions or circumstances, which in the opinion of the investigator, would avoid the completion of study participation, or interfere with analysis of study results, such as history of non-compliance or unreliability, or do have any additional medical condition that contraindicates non-surgical treatment
Local exclusion criteria
- Mucosal diseases such as erosive lichen planus in the area to be treated.
- History of local irradiation therapy.
- Implants with peri-implant bone loss beyond 2/3 of the implant length
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Non-surgical electrolytic cleaning
|
Verbal instructions on implant hygiene practices and removal of the implant supported prosthesis
Removal of the granulation tissue and mucosa and bone defect curettage with a steel curette 4R/4L (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) after applying local anestesia
Removal of supra and submucosal calculus with slim ultrasonic devices (Piezon PS instrument EMS; Nyon, Swiss).
Erythritol air powder-spray system (Air-flow ® master piezon, EMS, Nyon swiss) implant surface treatment.
This will be performed by separating the soft tissue with the aim of a periodontal probe (CP 15, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA).
Electrolytic cleaning of the implant surface following manufacturer's instructions (GalvoSurge Dental AG, Widnau, Switzerland), with the help of a non-metal periodontal probe to separate the soft tissues and aim the implant surface in all its length.
Antibiotic treatment (Metronidazole 500 mg, every day/ 7 day).
Other Names:
If necessary, modification and polishing of the prosthesis to make it cleanable.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Peri-implant disease resolution at 6 month
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Probing depth < 5 mm, with absence of bleeding or suppuration and no additional bone loss (Sanz & Chapple 2012)
|
6 months
|
|
Peri-implant disease resolution at 12 month
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Probing depth < 5 mm, with absence of bleeding or suppuration and no additional
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Implant survival rate at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Survival of installed implants as defined by Misch et al., 2007: presence in the mouth, no mobility, no pain upon function, radiographic bone loss less than 1⁄2, no uncontrolled infection.
|
6 months
|
|
Implant survival rate at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Survival of installed implants as defined by Misch et al., 2007: presence in the mouth, no mobility, no pain upon function, radiographic bone loss less than 1⁄2, no uncontrolled infection.
|
12 months
|
|
Implant plaque index at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Implant plaque index (PI) (at 6 sites/implant)(+/-).
|
6 months
|
|
Implant plaque index at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Implant plaque index (PI) (at 6 sites/implant)(+/-).
|
12 months
|
|
Peri-implant probing depth at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Peri-implant probing depth (PD) (at 6 sites/implant) recorded using a CPC-15 periodontal probe at 6 sites/implant (Hu-Friedy, Leinmen, Germany).
|
6 months
|
|
Peri-implant probing depth at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Peri-implant probing depth (PD) (at 6 sites/implant) recorded using a CPC-15 periodontal probe at 6 sites/implant (Hu-Friedy, Leinmen, Germany).
|
12 months
|
|
Bleeding on probing at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Bleeding on probing (BOP) from the peri-implant mucosa (measured at 6 sites/implant) (+/-).
|
6 months
|
|
Bleeding on probing at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Bleeding on probing (BOP) from the peri-implant mucosa (measured at 6 sites/implant) (+/-).
|
12 months
|
|
Suppuration at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Presence or absence of suppuration from the peri-implant mucosa (measured at 6 sites/implant) (+/-) nice, regular, unpleasant, very unpleasant).
|
6 months
|
|
Suppuration at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Presence or absence of suppuration from the peri-implant mucosa (measured at 6 sites/implant) (+/-)
|
12 months
|
|
Recession of the mucosal margin at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Recession of the mucosal margin, keratinized mucosa (at 6 sites/implant) (+/-).recorded
using a CPC-15 periodontal probe at 6 sites/implant (Hu-Friedy, Leinmen, Germany).
|
6 months
|
|
Recession of the mucosal margin at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Recession of the mucosal margin, keratinized mucosa (at 6 sites/implant) (+/-).recorded
using a CPC-15 periodontal probe at 6 sites/implant (Hu-Friedy, Leinmen, Germany).
|
12 months
|
|
Bone loss at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Distance between bone crest and implant shoulder at mesial and distal site. For standardization of the periapical radiographs the same film holder-beam aiming device will be applied to each treated implant (i.e. Rinn System, RWT window x-ray system or Non-surgical electrolytic cleaning CONFIDENTIAL similar). The radiographs will be taken with the film placed parallel to the implants and the x-ray beam directed perpendicular to the implants. The quality/contrast should be good enough to clearly identify the complete implant and its essential structures. Digital radiographs will be evaluated using a software (OsiriX Imaging Software, Pixmeo, Geneva, Switzerland) calibrating the distances with implant wide and length. |
6 months
|
|
Bone loss at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Distance between bone crest and implant shoulder at mesial and distal site. For standardization of the periapical radiographs the same film holder-beam aiming device will be applied to each treated implant (i.e. Rinn System, RWT window x-ray system or Non-surgical electrolytic cleaning CONFIDENTIAL similar). The radiographs will be taken with the film placed parallel to the implants and the x-ray beam directed perpendicular to the implants. The quality/contrast should be good enough to clearly identify the complete implant and its essential structures. Digital radiographs will be evaluated using a software (OsiriX Imaging Software, Pixmeo, Geneva, Switzerland) calibrating the distances with implant wide and length. |
12 months
|
|
Patient centred outcomes of the electrolytic cleaning after 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Patient centred outcomes of the electrolytic cleaning with a 5 options semi-quantitative scale (very nice, nice, regular, unpleasant, very unpleasant).
|
6 months
|
|
Patient centred outcomes of the electrolytic cleaning after 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Patient centred outcomes of the electrolytic cleaning with a 5 options semi-quantitative scale (very nice, nice, regular, unpleasant, very unpleasant).
|
12 months
|
|
Overall satisfaction after 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Overall satisfaction on a 5 options semi-quantitative scale (very nice, nice, regular, unpleasant, very unpleasant).
|
6 months
|
|
Overall satisfaction after 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Overall satisfaction on a 5 options semi-quantitative scale (very nice, nice, regular, unpleasant, very unpleasant).
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mariano Sanz Alonso, University Complutense Madrid
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- UCM ACA
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Peri-Implantitis
-
University of ManitobaUnknownPeri ImplantitisCanada
-
Istanbul Medipol University HospitalAnkara University; Ankara Medipol University; Lokman Hekim UniversityCompletedPeri Implantitis | Peri-Implant Health | Peri Implant MucositisTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Center of Implantology, Oral and Maxillofacial...RecruitingPeri-Implantitis and Peri-implant MucositisSpain
-
King Abdullah University HospitalJordan University of Science and TechnologyCompletedPeri-Implantitis and Peri-implant MucositisJordan
-
University of PittsburghRecruiting
-
Research Centre for Medical Genetics, Russian FederationCompleted
-
University of ValenciaCompletedEarly Apical Peri-implantitis
-
PolyPid Ltd.MIS Implant Technologies, LtdCompleted
-
Rambam Health Care CampusCompletedDental Implants,Peri-implantitis,SmokingIsrael
Clinical Trials on Implant hygiene instructions and removal of the prosthesis
-
University of CagliariNot yet recruiting
-
University of SharjahEnrolling by invitationComplete Edentulism | Survival, Prosthesis | Failure, Prosthesis | Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported | Complication;ProsthesesUnited Arab Emirates
-
Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and...Not yet recruiting
-
IRCCS San RaffaeleUnknown
-
Universitat Internacional de CatalunyaUnknown
-
Koite Health OyUniversity of Helsinki; City of HelsinkiCompletedOral Disease | Dental Plaque | Tooth Decay | Dryness Oral | Pus CollectionFinland
-
University of California, Los AngelesCompletedWomen With an ENG Contraceptive ImplantUnited States
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalIntegrum; Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)Active, not recruiting
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, AmiensCompletedArthroplasty | Length of StayFrance