- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05302635
The Effect of Simulation-based Training on Nursing Students
The Effect of Simulation-based Training in Nasogastric Tube Application in Children on the Clinical Skills of Nursing Students: An Experimental Study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ankara, Turkey
- Yuksek Ihtisas University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Studying in the 3rd year of the Faculty of Health Sciences, Nursing Department of Yüksek İhtisas University and Biruni University,
- Having successfully completed the clinical application of the Fundamentals of Nursing course, Internal Medicine Nursing course and Surgical Diseases Nursing course and not repeating the grade,
- Those who will take the Child Health and Diseases Nursing course for the first time,
- Students who volunteer to participate in the research will be included.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Having received training on enteral nutrition in children,
- Simulation training,
- Students coming from other health departments (such as anaesthesia, laboratory technician, elderly health personnel) or from health vocational high schools as nursing will be excluded.
- Students who want to exit the research at any stage of the research will be excluded from the research.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Simulated group
Students will be given training on nasogastic tube insertion and practice will be demonstrated in the laboratory based on the demonstration method and checklists, and will continue until students learn. Forms will be applied to students as a pre-test. A pilot scenario will be applied to two volunteer fourth year students. Prebriefing: Students will be informed. Students will implement the scenario in the simulation laboratory and will wear uniforms. The student will be given 5 minutes for preparation, the application will be taken one by one and 15 minutes will be given for practice. Researchers will only observe during this time. During the application, the student will be scored according to the checklist. Students will be recorded with video. Debriefing: Immediately after the end of the scenario, a debriefing session will be held with groups of 5 people. Feedback will be given on students' performance. Each session will last 20-30 minutes. Students will be given a post-test. |
Students will be given training on nasogastic tube insertion and practice will be demonstrated in the laboratory based on the demonstration method and checklists, and will continue until students learn. Forms will be applied to students as a pre-test. A pilot scenario will be applied to two volunteer fourth year students. Prebriefing: Students will be informed. Students will implement the scenario in the simulation laboratory and will wear uniforms. The student will be given 5 minutes for preparation, the application will be taken one by one and 15 minutes will be given for practice. Researchers will only observe during this time. During the application, the student will be scored according to the checklist. Students will be recorded with video. Debriefing: Immediately after the end of the scenario, a debriefing session will be held with groups of 5 people. Feedback will be given on students' performance. Each session will last 20-30 minutes. Students will be given a post-test. |
|
No Intervention: Control group
Students will be given training on nasogastric tube insertion and nasogastric tube application will be demonstrated with the demonstration method in the laboratory and will continue until students learn. Forms will be applied to students as a pre-test. A pilot scenario will be applied to two volunteer fourth year students. Prebriefing: Students will be informed. Students will apply the scenario on the model in the skill laboratory and will wear uniforms. The student will be given 5 minutes for preparation. Students will be taken to the application one by one and 15 minutes of practice time will be given. During the application, the student will be scored according to the checklist. Students will be recorded with video. Debriefing: Immediately after the end of the scenario, a debriefing session will be held with groups of 5 people. Feedback will be given on students' performance in the debriefing session. Each session will last 20-30 minutes. Students will be given a post-test. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-Efficacy - Competence Scale
Time Frame: immediately after training on nasogastic tube insertion and practice in the laboratory
|
The scale was developed by Sherer et al. (1982).
The scale, which does not belong to any subjective domain, measures the general perception of self-efficacy - efficacy.
The scale consists of 23 items and four subscales.
The subscales of the scale are respectively; These are "beginning the behavior", "maintaining the behavior", "Completing the behavior" and "Combating the obstacles".
For each item; It is a five-point Likert-type scale as 1 = does not describe me at all, 2 = describes me a little, 3 = is undecided, 4 = describes me well, 5 = describes me very well.
A score between 23 and 115 can be obtained from the scale.
A high total score from the scale indicates that the individual's self-efficacy-efficacy perception is at a good level.
The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the scale was performed by Gözüm and Aksayan (1999).
|
immediately after training on nasogastic tube insertion and practice in the laboratory
|
|
Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence Scale in Learning
Time Frame: immediately after the debriefing session
|
The scale was developed by Jeffries and Rizzolo (2006) as 13 items to measure students' simulation activity and self-confidence in learning.
Answering the scale for each item; 1=Strongly Disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Undecided, 4=Agree, 5=Strongly Agree (Franklin et al., 2014).
The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was carried out by Unver et al. (2017) and the total number of items decreased to 12.
|
immediately after the debriefing session
|
|
Clinical Decision Making Scale in Nursing
Time Frame: immediately after training on nasogastic tube insertion and practice in the laboratory
|
The Nursing Clinical Decision Making Scale was developed by Jenkins (1983) for nursing students.
This scale defines how nursing students perceive clinical decision making based on their own statements.
The scale consists of 40 items and four subscales.
The subscales of the scale are respectively; These are "Exploring options and ideas", "Exploring goals and values", "Evaluating results", and "Searching for information and adopting new information objectively".
Each subscale consists of 10 items.
Each item of the scale is evaluated as 5=Always, 4=Often, 3=Sometimes, 2=Rarely, 1=Never.
A high score from the scale indicates a high perception of decision making (Jenkins, 1983; Jenkins, 2001).
The Turkish validity and reliability of the scale was done by Durmaz Edeer and Sarıkaya (2015).
|
immediately after training on nasogastic tube insertion and practice in the laboratory
|
|
Nasogastric Tube Placement Checklist
Time Frame: During the application (experimental group= in the simulation laboratory; control group= in the skill laboratory
|
The Child Checklist was prepared by the researchers based on the literature (Bindler et al., 2014).
The skill performance of the student will be evaluated over a total of 100 points, by scoring each application step according to the degree of importance.
|
During the application (experimental group= in the simulation laboratory; control group= in the skill laboratory
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-Efficacy - Competence Scale
Time Frame: immediately after the debriefing session
|
The scale was developed by Sherer et al. (1982).
The scale, which does not belong to any subjective domain, measures the general perception of self-efficacy - efficacy.
The scale consists of 23 items and four subscales.
The subscales of the scale are respectively; These are "beginning the behavior", "maintaining the behavior", "Completing the behavior" and "Combating the obstacles".
For each item; It is a five-point Likert-type scale as 1 = does not describe me at all, 2 = describes me a little, 3 = is undecided, 4 = describes me well, 5 = describes me very well.
A score between 23 and 115 can be obtained from the scale.
A high total score from the scale indicates that the individual's self-efficacy-efficacy perception is at a good level.
The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the scale was performed by Gözüm and Aksayan (1999).
|
immediately after the debriefing session
|
|
Clinical Decision Making Scale in Nursing
Time Frame: immediately after the debriefing session
|
The Nursing Clinical Decision Making Scale was developed by Jenkins (1983) for nursing students.
This scale defines how nursing students perceive clinical decision making based on their own statements.
The scale consists of 40 items and four subscales.
The subscales of the scale are respectively; These are "Exploring options and ideas", "Exploring goals and values", "Evaluating results", and "Searching for information and adopting new information objectively".
Each subscale consists of 10 items.
Each item of the scale is evaluated as 5=Always, 4=Often, 3=Sometimes, 2=Rarely, 1=Never.
A high score from the scale indicates a high perception of decision making (Jenkins, 1983; Jenkins, 2001).
The Turkish validity and reliability of the scale was done by Durmaz Edeer and Sarıkaya (2015).
|
immediately after the debriefing session
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sevim SAVAŞER, PhD, Biruni University
- Principal Investigator: Hülya ZENGİN, PhD, Yuksek Ihtisas University
- Principal Investigator: Gizem KAYA, MsC, Biruni University
- Principal Investigator: Bahar ON, MsC, Yuksek Ihtisas University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- YIU-M-CI-002
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.