Ultrasound Imaging of the Diaphragm During Yoga Breathing

April 19, 2022 updated by: Teresa Emilia Fernandez Pardo, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid

INTRODUCTION The practice of yoga in recent years is becoming more common. Originating in India, yoga combines physical postures with a philosophy of life and breathing (pranayama). One of the breaths used during yoga practice is the so-called ujjayi or victorious breath. It consists of the voluntary contraction of the muscles of the larynx both in inspiration and expiration. This reduces the diameter of the larynx, reducing airflow and thus increasing intrathoracic pressure, as well as increasing expiratory/inspiratory time and reducing respiratory rate and dead space. It also increases oxygen saturation in healthy subjects, increasing respiratory effort. Several studies have verified the relationship between ujjayi breathing and increased BRS (cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity), by stimulation of the parasympathetic system at the glottis level.

This would favor a decrease in heart rate, as well as better control of stress and anxiety.

The cardiovascular and respiratory effects studied with ujjayi breathing have not evaluated the effect that this breath has on the activation of the respiratory muscles, mainly the diaphragm. The diaphragm is the main inspiratory muscle and as such, lung volumes and intrathoracic pressures created during respiration depend on its activation and position.

In recent years, ultrasound has become a technique widely used by pulmonologists and intensivists. It is an easy technique to perform, reproducible, non-ionizing, allows bilateral comparison, non-invasive and non-painful and whose results can broaden the information from other techniques such as spirometry and radiography.

There are standardized protocols to measure the diaphragmatic excursion, the thickness of the diaphragm HYPOTHESIS: ujjayi breathing is capable of generating greater activation of the diaphragm in subjects healthy with respect to spontaneous or pursed-lip breathing.

OBJECTIF: study and compare the activation and work of the diaphragm in different type of breathing (ujjayi, pursed lips and at rest) in healthy subjects who practice yoga or not. DESIGN: cross over study experimental, analytical and prospective. METHODOLOGY: 80 healthy subjets (40 yoga practitioners and 40 non yoga practitioners) participated at this study. All of them volunteers will undergo an ultrasound study of their diaphragm. To do this, following the stipulated protocol, three variables will be analyzed: diaphragm thickness, its rate of contraction, and diaphragmatic excursion, all of them at rest, ujjayi breathing, and pursed-lip breathing.

The ultrasound measurements will be taken by a single researcher, who is not the main one, and who will not know which group each of the subjects belongs to, thus avoiding an evaluation bias. To avoid bias and according to the RUSI regulations, the researcher will take 3 measurements of each of the explorations with the average of the 3.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • yoga practitioners for more than a year

Exclusion Criteria:

  • respiratory pathology
  • thoracic deformities
  • neuromuscular diseases
  • Under treatment with corticosteroids, muscle relaxants and/or barbiturates
  • allergic episodes in the last 3 weeks
  • thoracic or abdominal surgeries in the last 3 weeks

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Yoga practitioner

The RUSI protocol for taking measurements with ultrasound for physiotherapists will be followed. Three measurements of each of the explorations will be made with the average of the three, pausing for 30 seconds between each repetition.

Three variables will be analyzed: diaphragm thickness, its rate of contraction, and diaphragmatic excursion, all of them at rest, ujjayi breathing, and pursed-lip breathing.

Study and compare the activation of the diaphragm during different breaths: rest, ujjayi and pursed lips
Active Comparator: Non yoga practitioner

Each subject will have previously received (one week before taking the measurements) the instructions where the main researcher will have shown him what calm diaphragmatic breathing is like, as well as forced breathing at maximum inspired volume with neutral breathing, yoga breathing (ujjayi ) and pursed-lip breathing. During that week prior to taking measurements, the subjects should practice each breath for 20 minutes a day in order to have a good awareness of how to perform them correctly.

The RUSI protocol for taking measurements with ultrasound for physiotherapists will be followed. Three measurements of each of the explorations will be made with the average of the three, pausing for 30 seconds between each repetition.

Three variables will be analyzed: diaphragm thickness, its rate of contraction, and diaphragmatic excursion, all of them at rest, ujjayi breathing, and pursed-lip breathing.

Study and compare the activation of the diaphragm during different breaths: rest, ujjayi and pursed lips

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diaphragm thickness
Time Frame: Baseline, end maximal inspiration

The assessment will be taken in the right hemidiaphragm since it is more accessible than the left through its hepatic window. To evaluate the thickness the investigators will use a linear probe at 10-12MHz, placing it perpendicular to the intercostal space between the 9th and 10th rib, in the anterior part of the axillary line.

At this level, 3 parallel layers with different echogenicity corresponding to the pleura, diaphragm and peritoneum will be observed. The distance between the inner edge of the pleural line and the inner edge of the peritoneal line will be measured.

Baseline, end maximal inspiration

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diaphragm excursion
Time Frame: Baseline, end maximal inspiration

The distance it makes in inspiration will be measured, when it contracts and descends. A 2.5 to 3.5 MHz convex probe will be used.

The probe will be positioned firmly below the right costal arch and on the line corresponding to the middle of the clavicle, orienting it cranially. The investigators will visualize the dome of the right hemidiaphragm that appears as a thick hyperechoic line. The investigators look for the highest diaphragmatic position, which is the part of the diaphragm that produces the greatest cranial-caudal excursion. The M mode modality will be activated, which provides us with the pattern of diaphragmatic movement.

It will be measured from the highest point of the diaphragmatic dome (end expiration, in functional residual capacity) to the lowest point achieved at the end of each inspiration.

Baseline, end maximal inspiration
Activation speed
Time Frame: Baseline, end maximal inspiration
It is an indirect measurement that is calculated by dividing the diaphragm amplitude in cm by the inspiratory time in seconds. Will be measured with TM mode
Baseline, end maximal inspiration

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CEI-120- 2409

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

All the researchers will participate in all the study phases

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Yoga

Clinical Trials on Diaphragm´s study during yoga breathing

Subscribe