Ghana: The Barriers and Facilitators of Scaling up the Ellavi UBT for Postpartum Hemorrhage

April 20, 2022 updated by: Megan Parker, PATH

GHANA: An Implementation Study on the Barriers and Facilitators of Scaling up the Innovative, Low-cost Ellavi Uterine Balloon Tamponade for Postpartum Hemorrhage

The purpose of this implementation science study is to generate evidence that informs the successful uptake and adoption of the Ellavi UBT within Ghana's PPH management programs. The investigators aim to improve the likelihood that the Ellavi UBT will be integrated into the health care system by obtaining critical feedback from stakeholders and health care providers on the barriers and facilitators towards its successful adoption and roll out. The research will be done in three purposively selected facilities near Accra Ghana: Tema General Hospital, Ridge Hospital, and Kasoa Polyclinic.

This study uses a nonexperimental design to collect data on implementation (e.g. # staff trained, usability, user confidence, acceptability, feasibility). The study team will train all obstetric healthcare staff (i.e. obstetricians, midwives, medical officers, clinical officers) involved in PPH management at the 3 participating healthcare facilities on the Ellavi UBT. The investigators will gather feedback from the obstetric healthcare workers (post-training and post-PPH) to understand the barriers to and facilitators of use in order to evaluate acceptability and feasibility among facilities providing different levels of care (level 4, level 5 (county), level 6 (tertiary)). This process will help to generate training and facility level recommendations for improved uptake and integration into the local maternal care package. Case report forms and semi-quantitative surveys will be completed by obstetrical care providers to evaluate the primary outcomes of acceptability and feasibility by measuring: context of use, accuracy of use, perceptions of the device, user confidence, acceptability, usability, facilitators of use, barriers to use, use-patterns, and insights into training effectiveness. The secondary outcomes will include financial data to determine the cost of introducing the Ellavi UBT into the Kenyan PPH management protocols and the health system. The study will not involve the storage of biological samples. There is not a direct benefit of the study to the individual participants. All study participants will sign consent forms.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The purpose of this implementation research study is to generate evidence that informs the successful uptake and adoption of the Ellavi UBT within Ghanaian PPH management programs for both public and private sector programs. The investigators aim to generate evidence for Ghanaian stakeholders to use in their decision-making around the use of Ellavi UBT in PPH management programs.

Specific objectives:

To determine the adoption, penetration, sustainability and fidelity of implementing the Ellavi UBT device into PPH care in three health care facilities. The investigators will explore the number of health workers and facilities that receive the PPH and Ellavi UBT training, and percent of health workers and facilities that adopt the Ellavi UBT device over the 10-month period. The investigators will also assess factors that influence the adoption, penetration, sustainability, and fidelity through an operations research survey, and the Ellavi UBT questionnaire.

To determine the appropriateness, acceptability and feasibility of using the Ellavi UBT in participating health facilities at various levels of care near Accra, the investigators will explore user comprehension of the Ellavi UBT usage steps, accuracy of use, perceptions of the device, attitudes towards the device, user confidence, usability, facilitators of use, barriers to use, use-patterns, and insights into training effectiveness.

  • Sensitize senior management at each of the three participating facilities, separately.
  • Conduct two half-day trainings on PPH and Ellavi UBT use at each of the three participating health facilities separated by: 1) obstetricians, medical and clinical officers, and 2) midwives.
  • Collect individual initial (post-training) data to assess comprehension of Ellavi UBT usage steps, perceptions of the device, attitudes towards the device, user confidence, usability, and insights into training effectiveness.
  • Case Management Form (CMF): Obstetrical care provider will complete a CMF within 24hrs (<24hrs) of managing each PPH event. This will inform the study team of how decision-making algorithms were applied and accuracy of use.
  • Ellavi UBT Questionnaire: PATH-Ghana study team member will collect individual post (post-usage) Ellavi UBT use data (<72hrs) from each study participant (obstetrical care worker) to assess comprehension of Ellavi UBT usage steps, perceptions of the device, attitudes towards the device, user confidence, usability, facilitators of use, barriers to use, use-patterns, and insights into training effectiveness.
  • PATH-Ghana study staff will record secondary data from hospital registry books over a 9 month duration of this study (January-Sept 2021) in comparison to the same period in 2020 to examine changes in use of condom catheters, and Ellavi UBTs.
  • Use the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to identify constructs with the potential to influence the introduction and use of Ellavi UBT. These constructs will be mapped to questions in the questionnaire, and will be analyzed to identify their influence on Ellavi UBT use. Constructs that have influence on the implementation of UBTs (both positively and negatively) will be disseminated for use in future introduction and scale up of Ellavi UBTs.

To disseminate the information in national, regional, and international forums to support information sharing, increased awareness of the role of UBT for refractory PPH, and adoption of its use.

  • Summarize how the Ellavi UBT can be integrated into curriculums, guidelines, and hospital systems (e.g. patient-provider friendly materials) by analyzing the key facilitators and barriers.
  • Host a national level meeting with Kenyan MOH stakeholders and participating facilities
  • Publish and disseminate findings in a peer-reviewed journal h. Present at international conferences and forums, as funding permits. Show the use of Ellavi UBT using poster presentations and demonstration sessions at international obstetrics meetings: FIGO, WHO UBT group, Women Deliver as funding permits.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Accra, Ghana
        • Ridge Hospital
      • Accra, Ghana
        • Tema General Hospital
    • Central Region
      • Kasoa, Central Region, Ghana
        • Kasoa Polyclinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Obstetrical care providers who recently participated in a PPH/Ellavi UBT training and/or obstetrical care providers who recently managed a refractory PPH event. The study participant must work in 1 of 3 participating facilities. The number of interviewees per site will vary depending on the size of the facility and number of refractory PPH events.

Participants will be selected based on their participation in training sessions, or their management of a PPH event and will include obstetrical staff currently practicing at Tema General Hospital, Kasoa Polyclinic, or Ridge Hospital. Participants may be re-sampled with each use of the UBT.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Labor ward obstetric staff
  • Employed at 1 of the 3 hospitals participating in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-obstetric staff
  • Obstetric staff not employed at the 3 study hospitals

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Semi-quantitative post-training survey on the appropriateness and acceptability of using the Ellavi UBT device
Time Frame: 10 months
  • Appropriateness will be measured by capturing # deliveries and # postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) cases typically managed per month by the obstetric staff surveyed.
  • Acceptability will be measured by surveying obstetric staff on their perception of Ellavi UBT effectiveness in comparison to other PPH treatments, attitudes towards the device post training, device usability measures, and user-confidence operating the device.
10 months
Facility survey (quantitative) to determine adoption, penetration, and sustainability
Time Frame: 10 months
  • Adoption will be measured by the # of facilities (of 3 total) who ever used the Ellavi UBT over the 10 month period.
  • Penetration/Reach will be measured by determining the % of total staff (employed at the 3 hospitals) who were participated in our Ellavi UBT/PPH training courses.
  • Sustainability is measured by the # facilities (of 3 total) who ever used the Ellavi UBT 4 months after the training (at least 1 time), and the # of facilities that used the Ellavi UBT every month for 6 months after the training.
10 months
Semi-quantitative post-UBT-use survey on fidelity to training skills, and feasibility of using the Ellavi UBT device
Time Frame: 10 months
  • Feasibility will be measured by capturing the # of Ellavi UBT devices used to manage the PPH events, and barriers/enablers to use of the device.
  • Fidelity will be measured by questions asked on accuracy of use (fidelity to the training)
10 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Megan Parker, PhD, PATH

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 18, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

The de-identified data will be shared with the funder in the form of a study report. If data are held on a public database (due to publication requirements), they will not be linked to the study participant and their identity would not be revealed.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postpartum Hemorrhage

Clinical Trials on Training Obstetric staff on Ellavi UBT

3
Subscribe