- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05344144
EFT and Music on Psychological Development, Well-Being Status and Cortisol Level in Pregnant Women (EFT)
The Effect of Emotional Freedom Technique and Music, Applied to Pregnant Women Having Experienced Prenatal Loss on Psychological Development, Well-Being Status and Cortisol Levels
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Aim: The research is conducted to determine for the purpose of the effect of emotional freedom technique and music applied to pregnant women having experienced prenatal loss on psychological development, well-being status, and cortisol level.
Material and Method: The research is conducted in a randomized controlled manner with a total of 159 pregnant women who applied to the gynecology outpatient clinics of Elazig Fethi Sekin City Hospital between October 2020 and April 2021 (53 EFT, 53 music, 53 control). In the research, EFT was applied to the pregnant women in the EFT group twice, with an interval of one week; pregnant women in the music group were listened to music twice, with a one-week interval. Pregnant women continued the attempts for one week after the first attempt. SUDS, SUE Scale, PTGI, WHO-5 WellBeing Index were used to collect data, and a saliva sample was taken.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Kahramanmaraş, Turkey
- Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Anxiety level is 1 and above when measured with the subjective discomfort unit scale (Appendix 3),
- 18 years old and over,
- There are no conditions such as infection, wound, scar in the tapping areas,
- All pregnant women who did not have any health problems (such as preeclampsia, diabetes, heart disease, placenta previa, oligohydramnios, fetal anomaly) during pregnancy and baby were included in the sample.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Having any problem that prevents communication (such as not knowing Turkish, having hearing, speaking and understanding abilities),
- Contaminated salivary cortisol,
- Those with psychiatric health problems according to their medical records were excluded from the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Emotional freedom technique group
Emotional freedom technique group pregnant women who have experienced prenatal loss, who were included in the emotional freedom technique group with randomization method, will be given a counseling program including psychosocial care and emotional freedom technique application in addition to the routine.
|
EFT was applied to pregnant women with a history of prenatal loss twice, one week apart, by the researcher.
Between the two treatments, they were given personalized homework (on waking up in the morning and before going to sleep at night) for self-administration.
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Music group
Music group pregnant women who have experienced prenatal loss, who were included in the music group with randomization method, will be given a counseling program including music application in addition to the routine.
|
Music practice was applied to the pregnant women with a history of prenatal loss twice, one week apart, by the researcher.
For one week after the first application, the music application was applied by the pregnant woman once a day/for 30 minutes, and the researcher was reminded by phone message.
|
NO_INTERVENTION: Control
control group standard care group
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Determining the level of anxiety
Time Frame: In the first interview, SUE was applied to all pregnant women in all three groups as a pre-test at any time of pregnancy.
|
In order to determine the anxiety level of the pregnant women, SUE (Subjective Units of Experience) was applied.
SUE is used to determine the intensity of the person's emotion at the beginning and end of therapy.
The scale is scored between -10 and +10, with negative numbers for negative/unpleasant experiences and positive numbers for positive/pleasant experiences.
|
In the first interview, SUE was applied to all pregnant women in all three groups as a pre-test at any time of pregnancy.
|
Determining the level of anxiety
Time Frame: One hour after the first interview, SUE was applied to all pregnant women in all three groups.
|
In order to determine the anxiety level of the pregnant women, SUE was applied.
SUE is used to determine the intensity of the person's emotion at the beginning and end of therapy.
The scale is scored between -10 and +10, with negative numbers for negative/unpleasant experiences and positive numbers for positive/pleasant experiences.
|
One hour after the first interview, SUE was applied to all pregnant women in all three groups.
|
Determining the level of anxiety
Time Frame: Seven day after the first interview, SUE was applied to all pregnant women in all three groups.
|
In order to determine the anxiety level of the pregnant women, SUE was applied.
SUE is used to determine the intensity of the person's emotion at the beginning and end of therapy.
The scale is scored between -10 and +10, with negative numbers for negative/unpleasant experiences and positive numbers for positive/pleasant experiences.
|
Seven day after the first interview, SUE was applied to all pregnant women in all three groups.
|
Determining the level of anxiety
Time Frame: One hour after the third measurement, SUE was applied to all pregnant women in all three groups.
|
In order to determine the anxiety level of the pregnant women, SUE was applied.
SUE is used to determine the intensity of the person's emotion at the beginning and end of therapy.
The scale is scored between -10 and +10, with negative numbers for negative/unpleasant experiences and positive numbers for positive/pleasant experiences.
|
One hour after the third measurement, SUE was applied to all pregnant women in all three groups.
|
Evaluation of the level of psychological development
Time Frame: In the first interview, PTGI was applied to all pregnant women in all three groups as a pre-test at any time of pregnancy.
|
PTGI (Post Traumatic Growth Inventory) was applied to determine the psychological development level of the pregnant women. PTGI is a 21-item Likert-type scale developed to evaluate positive changes after trauma and is scored between 0 and 5. The lowest score that can be obtained from the scale is 0, and the highest score is 105. A high score indicates that the person has experienced a high level of growth after the traumatic experience. |
In the first interview, PTGI was applied to all pregnant women in all three groups as a pre-test at any time of pregnancy.
|
Evaluation of the level of psychological development
Time Frame: Seven day after the first interview, PTGI was applied to all pregnant women in all three groups as a post-test.
|
PTGI (Post Traumatic Growth Inventory) was applied to determine the psychological development level of the pregnant women. PTGI is a 21-item Likert-type scale developed to evaluate positive changes after trauma and is scored between 0 and 5. The lowest score that can be obtained from the scale is 0, and the highest score is 105. A high score indicates that the person has experienced a high level of growth after the traumatic experience. |
Seven day after the first interview, PTGI was applied to all pregnant women in all three groups as a post-test.
|
Evaluation of the level of well-being
Time Frame: In the first interview, WHO-5 well-being ındex was applied to all pregnant women in all three groups as a pre-test at any time of pregnancy.
|
WHO-5 Well-Being Index was applied to determine the pwell-being level of the pregnant women.
In order to determine mental well-being, the scale, which consists of 5 questions in total, is of 6-point Likert type, varying between "never", "sometimes", "less than half of the time", "more than half of the time" and "always".
The raw score is calculated by adding the numbers of the five answers, and the resulting score ranges from zero to 25. Zero represents the worst possible quality of life and 25 the best possible quality of life.
|
In the first interview, WHO-5 well-being ındex was applied to all pregnant women in all three groups as a pre-test at any time of pregnancy.
|
Evaluation of the level of well-being
Time Frame: Seven day after the first interview, WHO-5 Well-Being IndexI was applied to all pregnant women in all three groups as a post-test.
|
WHO-5 Well-Being Index was applied to determine the pwell-being level of the pregnant women.
In order to determine mental well-being, the scale, which consists of 5 questions in total, is of 6-point Likert type, varying between "never", "sometimes", "less than half of the time", "more than half of the time" and "always".
The raw score is calculated by adding the numbers of the five answers, and the resulting score ranges from zero to 25. Zero represents the worst possible quality of life and 25 the best possible quality of life.
|
Seven day after the first interview, WHO-5 Well-Being IndexI was applied to all pregnant women in all three groups as a post-test.
|
Evaluation of the level of cortisol
Time Frame: At the first interview, saliva samples were taken from all pregnant women in all three groups as a pre-test at any time of pregnancy.
|
Saliva samples were taken from pregnant women to determine the cortisol level. Saliva sample collection materials consist of 1.5 ml saliva collection tube (ependorf tube) and sips to facilitate the salivation process. The pregnant women were informed about the procedure to be followed and the saliva collection process was explained by the researcher. For salivary cortisol analysis, 96-well microplates were covered with cortisol-BSA at +4 C overnight and blocked with 200 µl BSA (1%) at 37 °C for 2 hours. Saliva samples were thawed before adding to microplates and centrifuged at 4000g for 10 minutes. The plates were incubated for 45 minutes at 37 °C and washed 5 times with washing solution. When the blue color occurred, the plates were read by the plate-reader spectrophotometer. Calibration curves were created using 4-parameter logistic regression curves and cortisol levels were measured using this curve. |
At the first interview, saliva samples were taken from all pregnant women in all three groups as a pre-test at any time of pregnancy.
|
Evaluation of the level of cortisol
Time Frame: Seven day after the first interview, saliva samples were taken from all pregnant women in all three groups as a post-test.
|
Saliva samples were taken from pregnant women to determine the cortisol level. Saliva sample collection materials consist of 1.5 ml saliva collection tube (ependorf tube) and sips to facilitate the salivation process. The pregnant women were informed about the procedure to be followed and the saliva collection process was explained by the researcher. For salivary cortisol analysis, 96-well microplates were covered with cortisol-BSA at +4 C overnight and blocked with 200 µl BSA (1%) at 37 °C for 2 hours. Saliva samples were thawed before adding to microplates and centrifuged at 4000g for 10 minutes. The plates were incubated for 45 minutes at 37 °C and washed 5 times with washing solution. When the blue color occurred, the plates were read by the plate-reader spectrophotometer. Calibration curves were created using 4-parameter logistic regression curves and cortisol levels were measured using this curve. |
Seven day after the first interview, saliva samples were taken from all pregnant women in all three groups as a post-test.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Esra KARATAŞ OKYAY, PhD, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- KSUESRAKARATASOKYAY001
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Anxiety
-
AstraZenecaCompletedAnxiety Disorders | Anxiety | Anxiety Neuroses | Anxiety StatesUnited States
-
Prisma Health-UpstateCompletedAnxiety | Anxiety, Separation | Separation Anxiety | Anxiety Generalized
-
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoUniversity of California, Los Angeles; University of CincinnatiRecruitingAnxiety, Separation | Anxiety, Social | Anxiety, GeneralizedUnited States
-
Yale UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Active, not recruitingGeneralized Anxiety Disorder | Anxiety Disorder of Childhood | Separation Anxiety Disorder of Childhood | Social Anxiety Disorder of ChildhoodUnited States
-
Nazife Begüm KARANCompletedDental Anxiety | Sedative; Anxiety DisorderTurkey
-
Loyola UniversityCompletedAnxiety | Anxiety State | Procedural AnxietyUnited States
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyCompletedAnxiety Neuroses | Anxiety States, Neurotic | Neuroses, AnxietyUnited States, Mexico, South Africa
-
West University of TimisoaraUnknownAnxiety Disorder/Anxiety StateRomania
-
Dr. Nazanin AlaviActive, not recruitingGeneralized Anxiety Disorder | AnxietyCanada
-
ProofPilotFisher WallaceActive, not recruitingGeneralized Anxiety Disorder | Anxiety | Generalized AnxietyUnited States
Clinical Trials on Emotional Freedom Technique
-
Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Inonu UniversityCompletedAnxiety | Nausea Gravidarum | Emotion Regulation | Vomiting of PregnancyTurkey
-
Soul Medicine InstituteCompletedStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticUnited States
-
Inonu UniversityCompletedPremenstrual Syndrome | Emotional ProblemTurkey
-
Selcuk UniversityCompletedStress | Self Efficacy | Emotion RegulationTurkey
-
Dokuz Eylul UniversityCompletedMultiple Sclerosis | Anxiety | Depressive Symptoms | Psychiatric NursingTurkey
-
Marmara UniversityActive, not recruitingAnxiety | Nursing Caries | EFTsTurkey
-
Istanbul Saglik Bilimleri UniversityCompleted
-
Yantai Yuhuangding HospitalCompletedAnxiety | Day Surgery | Preoperative Nursing Care | Emotional Freedom TechniqueChina
-
Ataturk UniversityCompleted