A Pilot Trial Examining Digital Parent Training Programs

May 16, 2023 updated by: Amit Baumel, University of Haifa

Examining the Impact of Intervention Design in Digital Parent Training for Child's Disruptive Behaviors: A Pilot Randomized Trial

The purpose of this pilot study is to preliminary examine the impact of a design mechanism aimed at increasing engagement in an unguided digital parent training program for child's behavior problems. Parents will be enrolled into one of two digital parent training intervention arms, dedifferentiated by their level of correspondence with the related deign mechanism.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this pilot study is to preliminary examine the impact of a design mechanism aimed at increasing engagement in an unguided digital parent training program for child's behavior problems. The design mechanism manipulated in this pilot relates to the extent to which program design promotes a positive behavior change. To achieve these goal two unguided digital parent training interventions, differentiated by their level of design (DPT-Standard vs. DPT-Enhanced), will be tested. This pilot aims to recruit 40-60 parents who report behavior problems in their children who will randomly receive one of the two interventions for 10 weeks.

The impact of DPT-E on user engagement and reported child behavior problems will be assessed based on comparison with DPT-Standard. Parental behaviors and sense of competence will be collected to assess the impact of intervention design on these mechanisms of change. In addition, the role of parents' motivation, and their ability to invest effort in making changes during the intervention will be assessed, to examine whether these variables moderate the impact of intervention's design on the aforementioned relationships. The investigators also aim to explore whether the relationship between usage and clinical outcomes is stronger in those using DPT-E compared with DPT-Standard.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

88

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Haifa, Israel, 3498838
        • University of Haifa

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 7 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Parents report they have a child between the ages of 3 and 7, who:
  2. Has externalized behavior problems based on A) Parents report at least 1 of the two first criteria of behavior problems to be above 4 (the middle point) & the average of all items ≥ 4, on a screening scale that consists of 9 items (on a Likert scale between 1 and 7) that is based on DSM-V symptoms for ODD.

    B) Parents report ECBI Problems to be above 14 OR Intensity to be above 130.

  3. Parents have access to computer at home with an Internet connection and a smartphone with a mobile data plan.
  4. Parents can read and understand Hebrew.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Parents report that the relevant child has been diagnosed with developmental delay, intellectual disability and/or autism spectrum disorder.
  2. Parent and/or child are already receiving therapeutic intervention (for the child) in other setting.
  3. The relevant child is treated with psychiatric medication.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: DPT-standard
A standard digital parent training intervention
The parent training intervention includes 7 modules, recommended to be completed within 7- to 10-weeks period. Module's content includes videos and texts guiding the parent through the training process; interactive features, such as multiple-choice questions with direct feedback. Additional features embedded within the platform include downloadable materials, and a Q&A section that contains frequently asked questions.
Experimental: DPT-Enhanced
Enhanced digital parent training intervention
DPT-Enhanced will include all the ingredients of DPT-Standard, but with additional features. The program itself is based on pre-defined decision rules that are either event or time based based on evidence based practice in promoting effective parental engagement. Each component includes a short learning phase, followed by a 1-2 week focusing phase. The focusing phase is designed to encourage and help parents to practice and acquire learned skills in their day-to-day lives, by making these skills more salient in their mind.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI) at 10 weeks
Time Frame: 10 weeks
The ECBI specifies 36 behaviors commonly reported by parents of children with behavior problems. For each behavior the parent specifies how often this problem occurs on a 1-7 Likert scale (1=never; 7=always; higher scores mean worse outcome), and whether this behavior is currently a problem (0=no; 1=yes; higher scores mean worse outcome).
10 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change from Baseline Behavior and Feelings Survey Externalizing Problems at 10 weeks
Time Frame: 10 weeks
The Behavior and Feelings Survey (BFS) parent report of Externalizing Problems in children and adolescents is based on summing 6 items that measure children's behavior problems on a 0-4 scale (0=not a problem; 4=a very big problem).
10 weeks
change from Baseline Parenting Scale (PS) at 10 weeks
Time Frame: 10 weeks
Two sub-scales of the Parenting Scale, Over-reactivity (11 items) and Laxness (10 items) will be used in this study. The parent is requested to mark his typical response on a 7-point Likert scale (1-7), when 7 indicates the ineffective spectrum (higher scores mean worse outcome), and 1 indicates the effective spectrum.
10 weeks
change from Baseline Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (APQ) positive parenting practices at 10 weeks
Time Frame: 10 weeks
3 items, 1 sub-scale: measuring positive parenting practices. Parents will be asked to mark the frequency they use each parental practice on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always; higher scores mean better outcome).
10 weeks
change from Baseline Me as a Parent (MAAP) self-efficacy at 10 weeks
Time Frame: 10 weeks
4 items, 1 sub-scale measures general parental self-efficacy. Responses range on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree (higher scores mean better outcome).
10 weeks
change from Baseline Parenting Tasks Checklist (PTC) self-efficacy at 10 weeks
Time Frame: 10 weeks
12 items, 2 sub-scales: behavioral self-efficacy (6 items), setting self-efficacy (6 items). Parents are asked to rate each item on a scale ranges from 0 to 100 (0=Certain I can't do it, 100=Certain I can do it; higher scores mean better outcome).
10 weeks
Program Usage Time
Time Frame: through program completion, an average of 10 weeks
Time on the platform (measured in minutes)
through program completion, an average of 10 weeks
Program Logins
Time Frame: through program completion, an average of 10 weeks
Number of user logins to the platform
through program completion, an average of 10 weeks
Number of Modules completed
Time Frame: through program completion, an average of 10 weeks
The number of program Modules that were completed while using the program
through program completion, an average of 10 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amit Baumel, PhD, University of Haifa

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 28, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 14, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

November 14, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2836

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe