Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block Versus Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block for Oncologic Thigh Surgery

November 4, 2024 updated by: Hamed Sayed Ashour, National Cancer Institute, Egypt

Ultrasound-Guided Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block Versus Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block for Oncologic Thigh Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This is a prospective; double blinded randomized controlled trial that will be conducted on cancer patients subjected to oncologic thigh surgery.The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the analgesic effect of supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block and lumbar erector spinae plane block in oncologic thigh surgery.Patients will be randomized into three equal comparable groups, Group A (Ultrasound-guided supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block (SIFIB)), Group B (Ultrasound-guided lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB)), and Group C (control group). Primary outcome parameter is the total postoperative morphine consumption over the first 24 hours postoperative. Data will be analyzed using IBM SPSS 26 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Pain is one of the most common and significant postoperative events experienced by many surgical patients. Orthopedic surgery is a relatively painful surgery due to the significant amount of bone and soft tissue resection, damage, and reconstruction. After thigh surgery for sarcomas, the patient may experience any of three distinct types of pain, including acute postoperative pain, persistent long-term nociceptive pain, and neuropathic pain related to intraoperative nerve injuries. The management of pain in limb sparing surgery patients and amputated patients is crucial during the rehabilitation program and often its approach is multidisciplinary. The ultrasound-guided supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block further built on earlier anatomic discoveries to more reliably anesthetize the three nerves: femoral, lateral femoral cutaneous, and obturator. The supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block has evolved as an effective means of providing analgesia to the thigh, the knee, and, most notably, the hip. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is an interfascial plane block reported in the treatment of postoperative pain from surgical procedures, ranging from shoulder to hip surgery. When performed at the lumbar 4th vertebral level, ESPB led to sensorial blockage between Th12 and L4 dermatomes lead to effective postoperative analgesia in hip and proximal femoral surgery. Although supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block and L-ESPB successfully reduced postoperative opioid consumption in previous study, no study has ever compared their efficacy in postoperative analgesia of adult patients undergoing oncologic thigh surgery under general anesthesia. Thus, in this randomized comparative study we are aiming to fill this gape in the literature.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 11796
        • Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: 18-65 years.
  • Physical status: ASA II,III
  • Patient undergoing oncologic thigh surgery under general anesthesia.
  • Body mass index (BMI): 20-40 kg/m 2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal.
  • Sensitivity or contraindication to local anesthetics.
  • Bleeding tendency due to coagulopathy.
  • Patients with opioid dependence or alcohol or drug abuse.
  • Patients with psychiatric illness that prevent them from proper perception and assessment of pain.
  • Contraindication to regional anesthesia e.g. local infection at the site of block, coagulopathy with INR more than 1.6: hereditary (e.g. hemophilia, fibrinogen abnormalities & deficiency factor II) acquired (e.g. impaired liver functions with PC less than 60%, vitamin K deficiency & therapeutic anticoagulant drugs) .
  • Significant renal insufficiency (plasma creatinine more than 1.5 mg/dl).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block group
Patients will receive ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca block injection 40 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% mixed with 2 ml of dexamethasone 4 mg/ml.

Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block group will receive ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca block injection 40 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% mixed with 2 ml of dexamethasone 4 mg/ml.

Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block group will receive ultrasound-guided lumber erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) injection 40 ml bupivacaine 0.25% mixed with 2 ml of dexamethasone 4 mg/ml.

control group will underwent surgery under general anesthesia and receive the perioperative routine protocol of analgesia

Experimental: Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block group
Patients will receive ultrasound-guided lumber erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) injection 40ml bupivacaine 0.25% mixed with 2 ml of dexamethasone 4 mg/ml.

Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block group will receive ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca block injection 40 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% mixed with 2 ml of dexamethasone 4 mg/ml.

Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block group will receive ultrasound-guided lumber erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) injection 40 ml bupivacaine 0.25% mixed with 2 ml of dexamethasone 4 mg/ml.

control group will underwent surgery under general anesthesia and receive the perioperative routine protocol of analgesia

No Intervention: control group
Patients underwent surgery under general anesthesia and received the perioperative routine protocol of analgesia by using I.V. fentanyl (1µg/kg), with elevation of mean arterial blood pressure for more than 20% of their baseline values, additional bolus doses of fentanyl 0.5 µg /kg.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
postoperative morphine consumption .
Time Frame: over the first 24 hours postoperative
Total postoperative morphine consumption over the first 24 hours postoperative.
over the first 24 hours postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
fentanyl consumption.
Time Frame: intra-operative
Total intra-operative fentanyl consumption.
intra-operative
The time of first rescue analgesia.
Time Frame: over the first 24 hours postoperative
The time of first rescue analgesia.
over the first 24 hours postoperative
Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: over the first 24 hours postoperative
Pain will be assessed using Visual Analogue Scale, both at rest and during movement, pain scores using visual Analogue Scale will be recorded in the post anesthesia care unit and for the next 24 hours postoperative.score (0) means no pain, scores(1-3) are considered mild pain, (4-6) moderate pain and (7-10) severe pain
over the first 24 hours postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Perioperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Ultrasound-Guided Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block Versus Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block

Subscribe