Clinical Trial of Blenderized Tube Feeds Varying in Viscosity

February 9, 2024 updated by: Bridget Hron, Boston Children's Hospital

A Novel N-of-1 Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial to Assess the Effect of Blenderized Tube Feeds on Esophagogastric Physiology

The investigators are conducting a 16 week multiple cross-over study (N-of-1 trial) comparing two blenderized tube feeds varying in viscosity in 40 children.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age > 1 year
  • >90% of total calories via G-tube for > 6 months
  • G-tube diameter ≥ 14 French
  • moderate severity of upper GI symptoms of nausea, bloating, postprandial fullness and early satiety defined as Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index-Daily Diary (GCSI-DD) composite score > 2
  • anticipated stable GI-related medications for the duration of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cystic fibrosis, primary ciliary dyskinesia, interstitial lung disease, bronchiolitis obliterans, or lung transplant
  • untreated malabsorptive intestinal disease (e.g. Crohn's disease, celiac disease)
  • Nissen fundoplication
  • use of non-standard enteral formulas (e.g. ketogenic formulas) for the management of metabolic, endocrine or neurologic rare diseases
  • allergy or intolerance to any component of the study diet
  • inability to tolerate bolus gastric feeds.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Extremely Thick - Mildly Thick - Extremely Thick - Mildly Thick
Participants will receive 4 weeks Extremely Thick, 4 weeks Mildly Thick, 4 weeks Extremely Thick and 4 weeks Mildly Thick blenderized tube feeds. The volume, caloric density and frequency will be matched to pre-study feeding regimen.
Commercial blenderized tube feed, not diluted
Commercial blenderized tube feed, diluted with ingredients contained in blend
Experimental: Extremely Thick - Mildly Thick - Mildly Thick - Extremely Thick
Participants will receive 4 weeks Extremely Thick, 4 weeks Mildly Thick, 4 weeks Mildly Thick and 4 weeks Extremely Thick blenderized tube feeds. The volume, caloric density and frequency will be matched to pre-study feeding regimen.
Commercial blenderized tube feed, not diluted
Commercial blenderized tube feed, diluted with ingredients contained in blend
Experimental: Mildly Thick - Extremely Thick - Extremely Thick - Mildly Thick
Participants will receive 4 weeks Mildly Thick, 4 weeks Extremely Thick, 4 weeks Extremely Thick and 4 weeks Mildly Thick blenderized tube feeds. The volume, caloric density and frequency will be matched to pre-study feeding regimen.
Commercial blenderized tube feed, not diluted
Commercial blenderized tube feed, diluted with ingredients contained in blend
Experimental: Mildly Thick - Extremely Thick - Mildly Thick - Extremely Thick
Participants will receive 4 weeks Mildly Thick, 4 weeks Extremely Thick, 4 weeks Mildly Thick and 4 weeks Extremely Thick blenderized tube feeds. The volume, caloric density and frequency will be matched to pre-study feeding regimen.
Commercial blenderized tube feed, not diluted
Commercial blenderized tube feed, diluted with ingredients contained in blend

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Upper GI symptoms
Time Frame: 8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)
differences in daily parental rating of upper gastrointestinal symptoms from the validated Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index-Daily Diary (GCSI-DD) between extremely and mildly thick blenderized tube feeds
8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gastrointestinal symptoms
Time Frame: 8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Gastrointestinal Symptoms Questionnaire, scale of 0 to 100, higher scores indicate less symptom burden
8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)
Gastrointestinal symptoms
Time Frame: 8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Gastroparesis Questionnaire, , scale of 0 to 100, higher scores indicate less symptom burden
8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)
Pulmonary symptoms
Time Frame: 8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)
Pediatric Cough Questionnaire, score ranges from 0 to 25, higher scores indicate less symptom burden
8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)
Health care utilization
Time Frame: 8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)
frequency of hospital admissions
8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)
Health care utilization
Time Frame: 8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)
length of hospital admissions
8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)
Health care utilization
Time Frame: 8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)
rates of ER/urgent care visits
8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)
GI medication use
Time Frame: 8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)
% of participants requiring acid suppressive medication or GI motility agents such as cyproheptadine and erythromycin
8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)
Height
Time Frame: 8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)
height
8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)
Weight
Time Frame: 8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)
Weight or weight for length
8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)
Weight for height/body mass index (BMI)
Time Frame: 8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)
weight for height (children < 2) or BMI (over 2 years of age)
8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)
number of patients with unplanned G-tube exchange
Time Frame: 8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)
8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)
urine output adequacy
Time Frame: 8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)
frequency of urine output
8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)
rate of respiratory suctioning per day
Time Frame: 8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)
how often suctioning is required (e.g. number of times per day)
8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)
need for antibiotics for pneumonitis
Time Frame: 8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)
frequency of antibiotics prescribed for pulmonary indications
8 weeks of extremely vs. 8 weeks of mildly thick blends (multiple cross-over design)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 12, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB-P00042262

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Feeding Disorders

Clinical Trials on Extremely thick blenderized tube feed

3
Subscribe