Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Hysterosalpingo-lidocaine-foam Sonography Versus Hysterosalpingography in Tubal Patency Assessment to the Gold Standard of Laparoscopy and Dye Testing

December 3, 2024 updated by: Islam Tarek Elkhateb, Cairo University
This is a cross-sectional study that compares the diagnostic accuracy of Hysterosalpingo-lidocaine-foam sonography combined with power doppler (HyLiFoSy-PD) in the assessment of tubal patency, with the diagnostic accuracy of hysterosalpingogram (HSG), and to the gold standard of laparoscopy and dye testing.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

122

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • AlQuahira
      • Cairo, AlQuahira, Egypt
        • Cairo university Kasr Alainy OBGYN hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Women in the reproductive age group between 18- and 40-years old presenting with primary or secondary infertility who underwent HSG in the previous 5 years as a part of their infertility work-up with availability of good-quality HSG images, & did not get pregnant in this period, and gave no history of incidences that might affect their tubes, such as : abdominal surgery or laparoscopy, pelvic inflammatory disease, smoking, and intrauterine device insertion.

Women fitting these inclusion criteria and scheduled for LDT as part of their infertility work up will be considered. HyLiFoSy-PD will be carried out few days before the already scheduled LDT.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age group (18-40)
  2. Informed signed Written consent.
  3. Scheduled for LDT as a part of their infertility management
  4. Have undergone HSG in the previous 5 years with the availability of good-quality HSG images.
  5. No incident factors that might have affected the tubal status after she underwent HSG within the previous 5 years, such as ; abdominal surgery or laparoscopy, pelvic inflammatory disease, smoking, and intrauterine device insertion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. LDT scheduled for a therapeutic purpose due to a known tubal or ovarian pathology
  2. Lack of good-quality HSG images.
  3. Withdrawal of consent.
  4. Using contraception
  5. Women outside reproductive age
  6. Known allergy to lidocaine
  7. Active pelvic inflammatory disease
  8. Undiagnosed genital tract bleeding.
  9. Evident tubal pathology (such as hydrosalpinx) or pregnancy diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasound (TV-US) prior to performing HyLiFoSy-PD 10- Incident factors that might have affected the tubal status after she underwent HSG within the previous 5 years, such as ; abdominal surgery or laparoscopy, pelvic inflammatory disease, smoking, and intrauterine device insertion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy of HyLiFoSy and HSG with reference to LDT, in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy.
Time Frame: July 2022- June 2024
July 2022- June 2024

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the procedure associated pain
Time Frame: July 2022- June 2024
Pain will be assessed during the procedure (after insertion of Foley's catheter, during injection of lidocaine-made gel foam) using the verbal rating scale (VRS). Interpretation will be like: no pain, mild pain, moderate pain, severe pain.
July 2022- June 2024
Evaluate the procedure duration
Time Frame: July 2022- June 2024
Duration is calculated in minutes, from the introduction of Cusco speculum to the exit of Foley's catheter
July 2022- June 2024
Percentage of failed or inconclusive attempts and possible reasons for that
Time Frame: July 2022- June 2024
July 2022- June 2024
Incidence and rate of potential complications for example: vasovagal and allergic reactions, venous intravasation
Time Frame: July 2022- June 2024
July 2022- June 2024

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe