- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05443451
- Original Trial
BETTY: BEnign Prostatic Hyperplasia Transperineal Targeted Microwave therapY
June 21, 2026 updated by: CHIU Ka Fung Peter, Chinese University of Hong Kong
3D-Ultrasound-Guided Transperineal Microwave Needle Ablation for Men With Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
This is a pilot study on applying 3D-Ultrasound-Guided Transperineal Microwave needle ablation for men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a prospective, single centre, open-label and non-comparative trial planned on 12 patients.
Patients who fit inclusion criteria would be recruited and offered microwave ablation to the enlarged prostate.
The patients will be closely followed up to 6 months after treatment with serial assessment on safety and efficacy.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
12
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- Prince of Wales Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age over 50 years.
- Benign prostatic hyperplasia with prostate size 30-80 cc
- IPSS ≥ 14
- PSA ≤ 4 ng/mL or PSA >4 ng/mL with no evidence of suspicious lesion on mpMRI
- Maximum urine flow rate (Qmax) ≤ 15 mL/s.
- Post-Void Residual ≤ 150 mL.
- Patient suitable for IV sedation and/or spinal anaesthesia and/or general anaesthesia and focal microwave ablation.
- Informed written consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Significant intravesical median lobe hyperplasia.
- Suspicious lesion on mpMRI prostate
- History of prostate, bladder or urethral surgery.
- History of prostate cancer
- Presence of stones, bladder diverticulum and/or bladder tumor
- History of long-term indwelling catheter.
- Urethral stricture
- Known coagulopathy or on anticoagulant
- Presence of a pacemaker.
- Active infection
- Dysuria due to bladder dysfunction.
- Serious medical illness, including any of the following: uncontrolled congestive heart failure, uncontrolled angina, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular event within 6 months prior to the screening visit.
- Neurological disorders that would impact bladder function (e.g., multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, spinal cord injury).
- Contraindications for mpMRI exam or MR contrast
- Acute and/or chronic renal failure (GFR <50 ml/min and serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/d).
- Patient currently participating in another interventional clinical trial.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Transperineal Microwave needle ablation for symptomatic BPH
|
The procedure will consist of a focal, transperineal, targeted microwave ablation of prostate adenoma.
Surgical planning using 3D transrectal ultrasound and real-time monitoring of the ablation would preserve key anatomical landmarks such as the bladder neck, prostatic urethra and verumontanum.
The Organ-Based Tracking (OBT®) patented technology would provide a 3D prostate model to facilitate real-time navigation-guided ablation and accurate mapping of treatment zone.
The procedure will be conducted under general anaesthesia, spinal anaesthesia, or monitored anaesthetic care / sedation.
An average number of one to three microwave ablations per lobe is expected, depending on the size and shape of each prostate.
The microwave ablation parameters will be chosen intraoperatively.
A urinary catheter may be necessary immediately after the procedure.
Patients are planned to be discharged on the same day or the day after when they are fit for discharge.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE) related to the treatment
Time Frame: At 1 month
|
The severity of AE is grade by Clavien-Dindo classification.
|
At 1 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Prostate volume change
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
Prostate volume change after treatment
|
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
|
Urinary symptoms measured by International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) score
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months
|
Change in total scores in International Prostate Symptom Score (ranges from 0 to 35) questionnaires.
The higher score, the more worse symptom.
|
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months
|
|
Erectile function measured by International Index of Erectile Function 5-item version (IIEF-5) score
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months
|
Change in International Index of Erectile Function 5 questionnaire score (ranges from 0 to 25).
The higher score, the more worse symptom.
|
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months
|
|
Ejaculatory function measured by MSHQ-EjD-SF (function and bother) score
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months
|
Change in MSHQ-EjD-SF questionnaire score (Range from 1-15 for function and and 0-5 for bother).
The higher score, the more worse symptom.
|
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months
|
|
Change in urodynamic in uroflowmetry
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months
|
Change in urodynamic function assessed by uroflowmetry, parameters include voided volume, maximum flow rate and post-void residual.
|
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months
|
|
PSA change
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
PSA change after treatment
|
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
|
Average patient post-operative pain level
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 and 4 hours after the procedure and at 1-week
|
Assessed by a pain numeric rating scale, Score 0-10, the higher score the worsen pain
|
Baseline, 2 and 4 hours after the procedure and at 1-week
|
|
Patient quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-week, 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month,
|
Assessed with the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, the higher the score the better in quality of life
|
Baseline, 1-week, 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month,
|
|
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-week, 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month,
|
Assessed with the PGI-I questionnaire,the lower score the more satisfaction
|
Baseline, 1-week, 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month,
|
|
Ease of the procedure measured with a score chosen by the operator
Time Frame: Post procedure immediately
|
1: easy, 2: moderate, 3: difficult
|
Post procedure immediately
|
|
Ablation treatment time
Time Frame: Intra-operation
|
Duration of the ablation procedure
|
Intra-operation
|
|
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: The total number of days of hospitalization for this surgical procedure up to day 30 after the procedure]
|
Total number of days of hospitalization for the surgical procedure
|
The total number of days of hospitalization for this surgical procedure up to day 30 after the procedure]
|
|
Operation time
Time Frame: Intra-operation
|
Duration of patients stay in Operation Room
|
Intra-operation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Peter Ka-Fung CHIU, FRCS, PhD, Chinese University of Hong Kong
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
- Chiu PK, Lo KL, Teoh JY, Ma SF, Leung CH, Wong HF, Li KM, Sae-Lo K, Kwok SW, Li SY, Yee CH, Hou SM, Ng CF. Sectoral cancer detection and tolerability of freehand transperineal prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Jun;24(2):431-438. doi: 10.1038/s41391-020-00293-1. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
- Chughtai B, Elterman D, Shore N, Gittleman M, Motola J, Pike S, Hermann C, Terrens W, Kohan A, Gonzalez RR, Katz A, Schiff J, Goldfischer E, Grunberger I, Tu LM, Alshak MN, Kaminetzky J. The iTind Temporarily Implanted Nitinol Device for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Urology. 2021 Jul;153:270-276. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.12.022. Epub 2020 Dec 26.
- Zhang W, Zhang X, Li H, Wu F, Wang H, Zhao M, Hu H, Xu K. Prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) in China: results from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 19;9(6):e022792. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022792.
- Ng CF, Yee CH, Chan CK, Wong HM, Chiu PK, Tsu JH, Teoh JY, Ho KL. Bipolar transurethral vapourisation versus monopolar transurethral resection of prostate: a randomised controlled trial. Hong Kong Med J. 2017 Jun;23 Suppl 2(3):32-34. No abstract available.
- Yee CH, Wong JH, Chiu PK, Chan CK, Lee WM, Tsu JH, Teoh JY, Ng CF. Short-stay transurethral prostate surgery: A randomized controlled trial comparing transurethral resection in saline bipolar transurethral vaporization of the prostate with monopolar transurethral resection. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2015 Aug;8(3):316-22. doi: 10.1111/ases.12197. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
- Madersbacher S, Lackner J, Brossner C, Rohlich M, Stancik I, Willinger M, Schatzl G; Prostate Study Group of the Austrian Society of Urology. Reoperation, myocardial infarction and mortality after transurethral and open prostatectomy: a nation-wide, long-term analysis of 23,123 cases. Eur Urol. 2005 Apr;47(4):499-504. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.12.010. Epub 2005 Jan 23.
- Raizenne BL, Zheng X, Mao J, Zorn KC, Cho A, Elterman D, Bhojani N, Sedrakyan A, Chughtai B. Real-world data comparing minimally invasive surgeries for benign prostatic hyperplasia. World J Urol. 2022 May;40(5):1185-1193. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03926-9. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
- McVary KT, Gittelman MC, Goldberg KA, Patel K, Shore ND, Levin RM, Pliskin M, Beahrs JR, Prall D, Kaminetsky J, Cowan BE, Cantrill CH, Mynderse LA, Ulchaker JC, Tadros NN, Gange SN, Roehrborn CG. Final 5-Year Outcomes of the Multicenter Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial of a Water Vapor Thermal Therapy for Treatment of Moderate to Severe Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. J Urol. 2021 Sep;206(3):715-724. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001778. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
- Barry Delongchamps N, Schull A, Anract J, Abecassis JP, Zerbib M, Sibony M, Jilet L, Abdoul H, Goffin V, Peyromaure M. Feasibility and safety of targeted focal microwave ablation of the index tumor in patients with low to intermediate risk prostate cancer: Results of the FOSTINE trial. PLoS One. 2021 Jul 14;16(7):e0252040. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252040. eCollection 2021.
- Lo KL, Chui KL, Leung CH, Ma SF, Lim K, Ng T, Wong J, Li JKM, Mak SK, Ng CF. Outcomes of transperineal and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Hong Kong Med J. 2019 Jun;25(3):209-215. doi: 10.12809/hkmj187599. Epub 2019 May 29.
- Roehrborn CG, Siami P, Barkin J, Damiao R, Major-Walker K, Nandy I, Morrill BB, Gagnier RP, Montorsi F; CombAT Study Group. The effects of combination therapy with dutasteride and tamsulosin on clinical outcomes in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: 4-year results from the CombAT study. Eur Urol. 2010 Jan;57(1):123-31. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.09.035. Epub 2009 Sep 19.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 8, 2022
Primary Completion (Actual)
October 5, 2023
Study Completion (Actual)
October 30, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 22, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 30, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
July 5, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
June 23, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 21, 2026
Last Verified
June 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CRE 2022.249
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.