Chicken Model in Teaching Episiotomy Repair

May 18, 2023 updated by: İlknur Münevver Gönenç, Ankara University

The Effect of Chicken Model in Teaching Episiotomy Repair on Satisfaction, Self-Confidence, and Anxiety Levels of Midwifery Students

The aim of this study is to determine the effect of chicken use in episiotomy repair training of midwifery students on students' satisfaction, self-confidence and anxiety levels.

Hypotheses H01 There is no difference between the satisfaction score of the chicken group and the satisfaction score of the control group in episiotomy repair training.

H02 In episiotomy repair training, there is no difference between the self-confidence score of the chicken group and the self-confidence score of the control group.

H03 There is no difference between the anxiety score of the chicken group and the anxiety score of the control group in episiotomy repair training.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey, 06230
        • Ankara University Faculty of Nursing

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Midwifery students who were registered in the midwifery department in the 2020-2021 academic year and take childbearing course,
  • Students over the age of 18

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having previously received training on episiotomy and its repair,
  • Students who fill in the data collection forms incompletely will not be included in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: sponge group
Control group
In the study, 15 cm x 20 cm sponge will be used for each student. Intermittent and continuous suture techniques will be practiced on the sponge.
Other Names:
  • Sponge Group
Experimental: Chicken group
Chicken legs will be used for each student in the study. Intermittent and continuous suture techniques will be studied on the incision made on the chicken leg.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale
Time Frame: immediately after training
This instrument is a 13-item scale used to measure student satisfaction with the simulation activity (5 items) and self-confidence in learning (8 items). Responses are rated on a 5-point Likert scale with values ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction and greater levels of self confidence.
immediately after training
Change in The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Time Frame: immediately before the training, immediately after the training and immediately after the clinical practice.

The inventory was developed by Spielberger et al. in 1970. An adaptation, validity, and reliability study of the State-Trait Anxiety Scale in Turkish was conducted by Oner and Le Compte in 1983. The scale consists of two subdimensions: the state anxiety has 20 items and is used to determine what is felt at a specific moment under certain conditions, and the trait anxiety has 20 items and is used to determine what has been felt in the last 7 days. High scores from each subscale indicate a high level of anxiety.

STAI-S consist of 20 items with four points Likert scales, each (not at all, somewhat, moderately so, very much so). Scores thus range between 20, indicating a low level of anxiety and 80, indicating a high level.

immediately before the training, immediately after the training and immediately after the clinical practice.
Change in satisfaction
Time Frame: immediately before the training, immediately after the training and immediately after the clinical practice.
Visual Analog Scale is a 10-cm-long measurement tool. The left end of the scale reads "I am not satisfied at all" and the right end reads "very satisfied". A high score on the scale indicated a high level of satisfaction and a score of 0 pointed to no satisfaction.
immediately before the training, immediately after the training and immediately after the clinical practice.
Self-Sufficiency
Time Frame: immediately before the training, immediately after the training and immediately after the clinical practice.
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)- assessed by adequate vision. For each item, students rated their sense of self-sufficiency on a scale of 0 (very inadequate) to 10 (very adequate).
immediately before the training, immediately after the training and immediately after the clinical practice.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 25, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 289

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Episiotomy Wound

Clinical Trials on Routine Education model

Subscribe