Effectiveness of a 6-week Specific Rehabilitation Program on Walking Capacity in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

May 7, 2026 updated by: Martin Descarreaux, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières

Effectiveness of a 6-week Specific Rehabilitation Program Combining Education and Exercises on Walking Capacity in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Neurogenic Claudication

The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a 6-week specific rehabilitation program combining education and exercises on walking capacity in patients with LSS causing NC.

The intervention group will receive standardized education and specific exercises while the control group will only receive standardized education. The program in both groups will last for 6 weeks with 4 evaluation timepoints (baseline, week 2, week 4 and post-intervention assessment). The primary outcomes will be walking capacity measured with the Self-Paced Walking Test and the secondary outcomes will be back and leg pain intensity, LSS-related disability, self-efficacy, level of physical activity, anxiety and depression, physical activity level, gait pattern characteristics, balance, and global perceived change.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada, G8Z 4M3
        • Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • being at least 50 years old
  • having a degenerative central LSS alone or in combination with other LSS types (e.g. foraminal, lateral) and/or a spondylolisthesis affecting one or multiple vertebral levels, confirmed by clinical history, physical examination and proper imaging
  • having NC associated with LSS
  • being able to speak and understand French
  • being willing to attend 3 intervention sessions per week
  • with a duration of signs and symptoms of at least 3 months
  • (7) being able to walk at least 20 meters without walking aid, but not being able to walk continuously for 30 minutes
  • being able to provide informed written consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • congenital LSS,
  • symptomatic osteoarthritis (hip or knee) causing limited walking capacity
  • neurological disease affecting walking capacity such as Parkinson
  • uncontrolled diabetes
  • heart failure
  • intermittent claudication of vascular origin
  • impaired cognitive capacity
  • back or lower extremities surgery in the past 3 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Group
Intervention group will received education and a specific rehabilitation program (exercises).

Exercises: 3 training sessions per week that will last for 30 minutes. Sessions will start with 5 minutes of activation (walking on a treadmill or cycling). Then, participants will be asked to complete 5 exercises targeting lower limb strengthening (time: 18 minutes) followed by 2 exercises designed to improve balance and 3 stretching exercises for the lower limb (time: 7 minutes).

Education: Two one-on-one sessions (during week 2 and week 4 assessments) during which participants will receive information directly related to LSS and NC using illustration and videos. Participants will also be invited to ask their questions.

Other: Control Group
Control group will received education alone.
Education: Two one-on-one sessions (during week 2 and week 4 assessments) during which participants will receive information directly related to LSS and NC using illustration and videos. Participants will also be invited to ask their questions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in walking capacity
Time Frame: Baseline, week 2, week 4, week 6, week 12
Walking capacity measure with the Self-Paced Walking Test (time)
Baseline, week 2, week 4, week 6, week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in leg and back pain intensity
Time Frame: Baseline, week 2, week 4, week 6, week 12
Leg and back pain intensity will be independently assessed using a 11-point numerical rating scale (from 0 to 10 points). Higher score indicates higher pain.
Baseline, week 2, week 4, week 6, week 12
Change from baseline in lumbar spinal stenosis related disabiltity
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6, week 12
Lumbar spinal stenosis related disability is measured with the French-Canadian version of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire. Pain, function and satisfaction related to lumbar spinal stenosis. Pain subscale score range from 7 to 35 with higher values indicate a worst outcome, Function subscale score range from 5 to 20 with higher values indicate a worst outcome, Satisfaction subscale score range from 6 to 24 with higher values indicate a worst outcome. The total score is composed of the three subscales and range from 18 to 79.
Baseline, week 6, week 12
Changes from baseline in self-efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6, week 12
Measured with Self-efficacy measured with the French-Canadian Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale. Each question is rated on a numerical scale (from 1 to 10). Total is calculated using the mean of the 33-items scores and ranges from 1 to 10 with a higher score indicate higher self-efficacy.
Baseline, week 6, week 12
Change from baseline in anxiety and depression
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6, week 12
Measured with the French-Canadian adaptation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Total score range from 0 to 21 with higher score indicating symptoms of anxiety and/or depression.
Baseline, week 6, week 12
Change from baseline in physical activity level
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6, week 12
Physical activity level assessed with the [Physical Activity Questionnaire for the Elderly]. The questionnaire allows to place participants into one of the 3 categories (low, moderate or high physical activity level). Physical activity level is measured in time per day.
Baseline, week 6, week 12
Patient's global impression of change
Time Frame: changes of the global impression of change throughout the study (baseline, week 2, week 4, week 6, week 12)
Global impression of change will be measured using a 7-point scale that ranges from 'very much improved' to 'very much worse' with 'no change' as the mid-point.
changes of the global impression of change throughout the study (baseline, week 2, week 4, week 6, week 12)
Change from baseline in biomechanical parameters of gait
Time Frame: Baseline, week 2, week 4, week 6, week 12
Spatio-temporal parameters of gait measured with wearable inertial sensors (velocity (m/s))
Baseline, week 2, week 4, week 6, week 12
Change from baseline in biomechanical parameters of gait
Time Frame: Baseline, week 2, week 4, week 6, week 12
Spatio-temporal parameters of gait measured with wearable inertial sensors measured in meters (stride length, swing witdh, toe clearance)
Baseline, week 2, week 4, week 6, week 12
Change from baseline in biomechanical parameters of gait
Time Frame: Baseline, week 2, week 4, week 6, week 12
Spatio-temporal parameters of gait measured with wearable inertial sensors measured in % (walking phases, assymetry, variability)
Baseline, week 2, week 4, week 6, week 12
Change from baseline in lower extremity physical function and balance
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6, week 12
Lower extremity physical function and balance measured with the Short Physical Performance Battery. Total score ranges from 0 to 12 with higher score indicating a better lower extremity physical function and balance.
Baseline, week 6, week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 26, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Stenosis

Clinical Trials on Exercises and education

Subscribe