Study of H-FICB & PENG Block in Elderly Patients' THA on the Post-operative Quality of Recovery

February 2, 2023 updated by: Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University

Comparative Prospective Randomized Study of Modified Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block Versus Pericapsular Nerve Group Block in Elderly Patients' Total Hip Arthroplasty on the Post-operative Quality of Recovery

Total joint replacement is projected to become the most common elective surgical procedure in the coming decade; the prevalence of total hip arthroplasty (THA) was estimated as more than 2.5 million individuals in the entire United States population. Orthopedic procedures involving the hip have remained challenging for regional anesthesia given the complex innervation, painful nature contributing to difficulty positioning, and a desire to maintain mobility to hasten postoperative recovery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

By comparing the intraoperative and postoperative rehabilitation indexes of high fascia iliac nerve block and hip pericapsular nerve block, we can choose a more suitable analgesic method for this operation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Jiangsu
      • Nantong, Jiangsu, China, 0513
        • Recruiting
        • Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 80 years (OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 65 to 80 years male and female
  • Scheduled for elective single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • The patients volunteered to participate in the study and signed the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Preexisting neuropathy
  • Coagulopathy
  • Local skin infection
  • Hepatic, renal or cardiorespiratory failure
  • Local anesthetic allergy
  • Pregnancy
  • Complications of gallstone with gallbladder perforation
  • Diffuse peritonitis
  • Acute pyogenic cholangitis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Group F: H-FICB under ultrasound guidance before general anesthesia
Group F was subjected to a high fascia iliaca compartment block under ultrasound guidance before general anesthesia.
H-FICB was guided by ultrasound before general anesthesia. The patient was supine. First, the probe is placed transversely above the groin. Then slide the probe up and down to reveal a clear image of the internal oblique and sartorius muscles. There is a bowtie-like iliac fascia space at the junction of these two muscles. After the scanning, the needle was inserted behind the probe with the tip pointed to the ventral side under the guidance of real-time ultrasound; the tip passed through the skin into the iliac fascia space and advanced to the inguinal ligament. After no blood was extracted, 1 ~ 2 ml of normal saline was firstly injected to determine whether the tip position was correct. If the needle tip was correctly positioned, 0.375% ropivacaine 30 mL of local anesthetic was injected. The H-FICB was performed under ultrasound guidance by the same anesthesiologist.
EXPERIMENTAL: Group P: PENG block under ultrasound guidance before general anesthesia
Group P was subjected to a pericapsular nerve group (PENG) Block under ultrasound guidance before general anesthesia.
A low-frequency curvilinear transducer was placed in the transverse plane over the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) and moved over inferiorly to visualize the pubic ramus. The femoral artery and ilio pubic eminence (IPE) were then visualized (Figure 1). Using in-plane technique 10 cm echogenic 21 gauge needle was advanced from lateral to medial direction, and 20 ml of local anesthetic 0.5% ropivacaine was deposited between the psoas tendon anteriorly and pubic ramus posteriorly.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline visual analogue scale
Time Frame: one day before the operation.
Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity. Based on the distribution of pain Visual Analogue Scale scores in post-surgical patients (knee replacement, hysterectomy, or laparoscopic myomectomy) who described their postoperative pain intensity as none, mild, moderate, or severe, the following cut points on the pain Visual Analogue Scale have been recommended: no pain (0-4 mm), mild pain(5-44 mm), moderate pain (45-74 mm), and severe pain (75-100 mm).
one day before the operation.
Harris Hip Score
Time Frame: At one week, one month, and three months post-operatively.
The HHS is divided into three sections. The first section are questions about pain and its impact which are answered by the patient or client. The second and third sections require the physiotherapist to assess the patient or client's hip joint and function.The HHS is a measure of dysfunction so the higher the score, the better the outcome for the individual. Results can be recorded and calculated online. The maximum score possible is 100. Results can be interpreted with the following[1]: <70 = poor result; 70-80 = fair, 80-90 = good, and 90-100 = excellent.
At one week, one month, and three months post-operatively.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The mini-mental State Examination
Time Frame: one day before the operation.
The mini-mental State Examination is effective as a screening tool for cognitive impairment in older, community-dwelling, hospitalized, and institutionalized adults. Assessment of an older adult's cognitive function is best achieved when it is done routinely, systematically, and thoroughly. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) or Folstein test is a 30-point questionnaire that is used extensively in clinical and research settings to measure cognitive impairment. Any score of 24 or more (out of 30) indicates normal cognition. Below this, scores can indicate severe (≤9 points), moderate (10-18 points), or mild (19-23 points) cognitive impairment. The raw score may also need to be corrected for educational attainment and age.
one day before the operation.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

October 1, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 1, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

September 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Recovery

Clinical Trials on ultrasound-guided high fascia iliaca compartment block

Subscribe