Comprehensive Ultrasound Evaluation as a Predictor of Weaning

May 8, 2024 updated by: Alberto Fogagnolo, Università degli Studi di Ferrara

Can Heart-lung-respiratory Muscles Ultrasound Evaluation Play a Role to Predict Weaning in Critically Ill Patients?

Several studies investigated the role of specific clinical predictors of weaning success, but it is determined by a combination of different aspects that can result in success or failure. Indeed, unresolved lung disease, cardiac dysfunction, loss of respiratory and core muscle strength can play a role in a failure weaning to mechanical ventilation (MV). The investigators hypothesized that a combined score that include heart, lung, and respiratory muscle ultrasound (US) evaluation could be able to predict the ability of weaning success. Furthermore, it will be described weather the days of MV before weaning trial may affect the relevance of each clinical variable evaluated.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Critically ill patients undergone at least 48 hours of MV and ready to spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) will be included in the study. The spontaneous breathing trial is performed in pressure support ventilation with a clinician-set positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) ≤ 5 cm H2O and FiO2< 40%. In addition to the parameters traditionally used for the evaluation of weaning (RSBI), the investigators will perform ultrasound evaluation of diaphragm, lung parenchyma, cardiac function, and the strength of the hand grip.

Investigators will evaluate the diaphragmatic parameters (thickening fraction,TF, and diaphragmatic displacement, DD) and TFmax (TF during forced breathing /TF during tidal respiration) to identify the inspiratory reserve. Weaning success is considered as liberation from MV within 72 hours.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

89

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ferrara, Italy, 44121
        • Università di Ferrara
      • Siena, Italy, 53100
        • Università di Siena

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

mechanically ventilated patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged between 18 and 90 years
  • Mechanical ventilation> 48 h
  • Reason for ICU admission: medical / surgical / trauma

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age under 18
  • diagnosis of neuromuscular disease
  • tracheostomy
  • terminal extubation
  • pregnancy in progress -
  • previous paralysis of the diaphragm or of a hemidiaphragm
  • use of neuromuscular blocking drugs in continuous infusion in the 48 hours preceding the weaning attempt.
  • Refusal to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Cohort
Patients will undergo a spontaneous breathing trial. Any extubation will be decided by an independent operator.
Non-ultrasound parameters: Central venous pressure, hand-grip strength evaluation, P0.1, Maximal inspiratory pressure, Blood gas analysis ultrasound parameters: Diaphragmatic displacement, thickening fraction, TFmax, E/e', Triscuspidal annular Plane Systolic Excursion, Lung score

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessing the prognostic value of a combined score in predicting weaning success
Time Frame: 72 hours
We hypothesized that a combined score that include heart, lung, and respiratory muscle ultrasound (US) evaluation could be able to predict the ability of weaning success.
72 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Interaction between days of mechanical ventilator and determinant of weaning success
Time Frame: 28 days
We will assess the interaction between days of mechanical ventilation and the prognostic value of Central venous pressure, hand-grip strength evaluation, P0.1, Maximal inspiratory pressure, Blood gas analysis, Diaphragmatic displacement, thickening fraction, TFmax, E/e', Triscuspidal annular Plane Systolic Excursion, Lung score in predicting weaning success
28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 9, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 2, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

May 8, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • WEAN_US

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Weaning Failure

Clinical Trials on Comprehensive evaluation

Subscribe