Use of Erbium Laser for Extraction of the Third Molars

Use of Erbium Laser With the Wavelength 2.94 nm for Extraction of the Impacted Lower Third Molars

A comparative analysis of the effectiveness of the erbium laser with the wavelength of 2.94 µm and traditional instruments in the extraction of the impacted lower third molars will be performed. Clinical, radiological and biochemical findings will be assessed after extraction of the impacted lower third molars.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A single-centre, interventional, non-randomized, prospective clinical trial in 2 parallel groups is planned. The lower third molars will be extracted in 60 patients. There will be 2 groups. The number of men and women in both groups will be the same, the patients age will be between 18 and 70 years. In the study group the lower third molars will be extracted using erbium laser with a wavelength of 2.94 µm (Erbium laser Smart 2940D plus with the wavelength 2,94 µm, company- DEKA, Italy, registration № 2005/1245), in the control group the lower third molars will be extracted using the conventional method (cutting and rotating instruments). Postoperative clinical symptoms such as collateral soft tissue swelling, postoperative pain, trismus in the extraction site and healing time (epithelization and bone regeneration) will be assessed. The epithelization will be assessed after 7, 10, 14 days. The bone regeneration will be assessed by cone beam computed tomography (KAVO, ORTHOPANTOMOGRAPH ОР 3D, type: РСХ-1; registration № РЗН 2020/10586) after 1, 3, 6 months. The radiation exposure will not exceed the permissible limits. Biochemical indicators in the saliva will be assessed before extraction, after extraction, 3 days and 7 days after the extraction. The Shapiro-Wilk test will be applied to check the normality of variable distribu- tion. Qualitative variables will be analyzed by Pearson's chi-squared test. Quantitative variables (normal distribution of variable) will be analyzed by Students t-test, non-normal distribution of variables will be analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 66 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Signing of written informed consent of the patient to participate in a study
  2. Age from 25 to 50 years old
  3. Indications for impacted third molar extraction
  4. Patients who are medically stable
  5. Therapeutic and surgical oral hygiene before surgery (absence of inflammatory diseases, caries, pulpitis, periodontitis in oral cavity)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Refusal of the patient from further participation in the study
  2. Pregnancy diagnosed after the inclusion into the trial
  3. Non-compliance by the patient with postoperative recommendations
  4. Absence of a lower second molar

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group with impacted third molar, extracted by cutting and rotary tools
The study group will include 28 patients with indications (impacted third molars that exerts pressure on the adjacent tooth and cause inflammation process in the surrounding tissue; absence of antagonist; pericorinitis; periodontitis; periodontal pockets) for the impacted third molar extraction. Patients will be comparable by gender and age, the patients age will be between 18 and 70 years. Patients should be with therapeutic and surgical oral hygiene and without co-morbidities.
Extraction of the impacted lower third molar will be conducted using cutting and rotary tools under the local anesthesia (Ultracain D-S 1:100000 40 mg/ml, active substance- articaine+epinephrine, registration № П N015119/01 ). Scalpel will be used for the incision of the soft tissues, rotary instruments will be used for the bone tissue and tooth fragmentation. After the extraction the wound will be sutured by the suture material.
Active Comparator: Group with impacted third molar, extracted by erbium laser 2.94 nm
The study group will include 28 patients with indications (impacted third molars that exerts pressure on the adjacent tooth and cause inflammation process in the surrounding tissue; absence of antagonist; pericorinitis; periodontitis; periodontal pockets) for the impacted third molar extraction.Patients will be comparable by gender and age, the patients age will be between 18 and 70 years. Patients should be with therapeutic and surgical oral hygiene and without co-morbidities.
Extraction of the impacted lower third molar will be conducted using erbium laser with wavelength 2.94 nm under the local anesthesia (Ultracain D-S 1:100000 40 mg/ml, active substance- articaine+epinephrine, registration № П N015119/01 ). The soft tissue and bone tissue will be dissected by erbium laser with wavelength 2.94 µm (Erbium laser Smart 2940D plus with the wavelength 2,94 µm, company- DEKA, Italy, registration № 2005/1245). After the extraction the wound will be sutured by the suture material (registration № ФСЗ 2010/06040; 07.08.2018)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment the level of bone regeneration according to Radiographic bone height (RBH)
Time Frame: Days 180 after extraction
Assessment the level of bone regeneration according to Radiographic bone height (RBH) by cone beam computed tomography after extraction of the lower third molar. (Radiographic bone height (RBH)- is the distance between root apex of the distal root and uppermost intersecting point between distal root of the second molar and mesial wall of extraction socket, it will be measured on the cone beam computed tomography)
Days 180 after extraction

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiographic bone height (RBH)
Time Frame: 3;6 months
Assessment the level of bone regeneration according to Radiographic bone height (RBH) by cone beam computed tomography after extraction of the lower third molar with erbium laser. (Radiographic bone height (RBH)- is the distance between root apex of the distal root of the second molar and uppermost intersecting point between distal root of the second molar and mesial wall of extraction socket, it will be measured on the cone beam computed tomography)
3;6 months
Radiographic infrabony defect (RID)
Time Frame: 3;6 months
Assessment the level of bone regeneration according to Radiographic infrabony defect (RID) by cone beam computed tomography after extraction of the lower third molar with erbium laser. (Radiographic infrabony defect (RID) is the distance between cemento-enamel junction of the second molar and uppermost intersecting point between distal root of the second molar and mesial wall of extraction socket; it will be measured on the cone beam computed tomography)
3;6 months
Post-operative pain
Time Frame: 1;3;5;7;10 days
Post-operative pain will be assessed by 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS) in the area of the extracted tooth
1;3;5;7;10 days
Post-operative oedema
Time Frame: 1;3;5;7;10 days
Assessment the soft tissue epithelization using six-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of swelling, where 0 indicates "no swelling", and 5 indicates "extreme severe swelling
1;3;5;7;10 days
Soft tissue epithelization
Time Frame: 7;10;14
Assessment the soft tissue epithelization using a photoprotocol (the day on which full tissue regeneration has taken place will be taken into account)
7;10;14
Trismus
Time Frame: 1;3;5;7;10 days
Assessment the distance between upper and lower incisors in mm
1;3;5;7;10 days
sRANKL (soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand)
Time Frame: before surgery, after surgery, 3;7 days
Assessment the level of sRANKL in saliva by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, ELISA
before surgery, after surgery, 3;7 days
OPG (osteoprotegerin)
Time Frame: before surgery, after surgery, 3;7 days
Assessment the level of OPG in saliva by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, ELISA
before surgery, after surgery, 3;7 days
Fibroblast growth factor-b (FGF-b)
Time Frame: before surgery, after surgery, 3;7 days
Assessment the level of FGF-b in saliva
before surgery, after surgery, 3;7 days
C-reactive protein (CRP)
Time Frame: before surgery, after surgery, 3;7 days
Assessment the level of CRP in saliva by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
before surgery, after surgery, 3;7 days
IgA
Time Frame: before surgery, after surgery, 3;7 days
Assessment the level of IgA in saliva by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
before surgery, after surgery, 3;7 days
IgG
Time Frame: before surgery, after surgery, 3;7 days
Assessment the level of IgG in saliva by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
before surgery, after surgery, 3;7 days
IgM
Time Frame: before surgery, after surgery, 3;7 days
Assessment the level of IgM in saliva by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
before surgery, after surgery, 3;7 days
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)
Time Frame: before surgery, after surgery, 3;7 days
Assessment the level of VEGF in saliva by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
before surgery, after surgery, 3;7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Diana Sologova, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

December 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 9, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 9, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 9, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 6482963527

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

No, dissemination of data is prohibited by the local ethics committee

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Impacted Third Molar Tooth

Clinical Trials on Third molar extraction by cutting and rotary tools

Subscribe