- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06262841
Post-Surgical Morbidity and Bone Healing of Impacted Lower Third Molars: Piezosurgery vs. Conventional Instruments
February 8, 2024 updated by: Murat Kaan Erdem, Ankara University
Comparative Evaluation of Morbidity and Alveolar Bone Healing After Surgical Extraction of Impacted Lower Third Molar Teeth Using Piezosurgery and Conventional Instruments: A Split-Mouth Clinical Study
The aim of this study is to compare piezosurgery and conventional surgery in impacted third molar surgery and to determine its effect on postoperative outcomes and quality of life.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The aim of our study is to comparatively evaluate the duration of the operation and the pain, trismus, edema and healing of the alveolar bone that occur after tooth extraction in surgical extractions of impacted lower third molar teeth using piezosurgery and traditional rotary instruments.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
21
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Çankaya
-
Ankara, Çankaya, Turkey, 06510
- Ankara University Faculty of Dentistry
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ASA I-II
- Aged 18-35
- Symmetrical Class 2 Position B according to Winter and Pell-gregory classification
- Asymptomatic lower third molar tooth with the same difficulty according to the Yuasa difficulty index
Exclusion Criteria:
- Individuals who had systemic disease affecting bone or soft tissue metabolism
- Smokers (more than 10 cigarettes a day)
- Alcohol dependent
- Systemic disease affecting bone or soft tissue metabolism
- Acute pericoronitis or acute periodontal disease at the time of operation, and used antibiotics due to acute infection
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Piezosurgery group
In the experimental group, a piezosurgery device was used to remove the bone surrounding the impacted third molar. Intervention: Device: Piezosurgery |
Piezosurgery used as an osteotomy device
|
Active Comparator: Conventional group
In the control group, conventional burs were used to remove the bone surrounding the impacted third molar. Intervention: Device: Conventional burs |
Conventional burs used as an osteotomy device
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in Oral Health-related Quality of Life
Time Frame: Time Frame: 14 days
|
Evaluated by Oral Health Impact Profile-14 questionnaire (OHIP-14).
The OHIP-14 scores can range from 0 to 56 and are calculated by summing the ordinal values for the 14 items.
The domain scores can range from 0 to 8. Higher OHIP-14 scores indicate worse and lower scores indicate better Oral Health Related Quality of Life.
|
Time Frame: 14 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in pain
Time Frame: 7 days
|
Postoperative pain was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranging from the absence of pain (score 0) to the most severe pain imaginable
|
7 days
|
Change in Mouth opening
Time Frame: 7 days
|
The distance between the mesio-incisal corners of the upper and lower central incisors was measured with the help of a ruler when the mouth opening was at its maximum.
|
7 days
|
Operation time
Time Frame: Intraoperative
|
The total time from the first incision of the operation site to the last suture was measured with the help of a digital stopwatch as the operation time.
|
Intraoperative
|
Change in facial swelling
Time Frame: 7 days
|
With the technique described by Neupert ; Angle of mandible-tragus Angle of mandible-lateral canthus of eye Mandible corner-nose wing Angle of mandible oral-commissures Measurements were made with a tape measure from 5 points, with the mandible corner-pogonion.
|
7 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Murat K Erdem, PhD, DDS, Ankara University Faculty of Dentistry
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Ren YF, Malmstrom HS. Effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in third molar surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Oct;65(10):1909-21. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.03.004.
- Rullo R, Addabbo F, Papaccio G, D'Aquino R, Festa VM. Piezoelectric device vs. conventional rotative instruments in impacted third molar surgery: relationships between surgical difficulty and postoperative pain with histological evaluations. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013 Mar;41(2):e33-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
- Rosa AL, Carneiro MG, Lavrador MA, Novaes AB Jr. Influence of flap design on periodontal healing of second molars after extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002 Apr;93(4):404-7. doi: 10.1067/moe.2002.122823.
- Piersanti L, Dilorenzo M, Monaco G, Marchetti C. Piezosurgery or conventional rotatory instruments for inferior third molar extractions? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Sep;72(9):1647-52. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.04.032. Epub 2014 May 6.
- Cho H, David MC, Lynham AJ, Hsu E. Effectiveness of irrigation with chlorhexidine after removal of mandibular third molars: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jan;56(1):54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
- Cicciu M, Stacchi C, Fiorillo L, Cervino G, Troiano G, Vercellotti T, Herford AS, Galindo-Moreno P, Di Lenarda R. Piezoelectric bone surgery for impacted lower third molar extraction compared with conventional rotary instruments: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Jan;50(1):121-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
- Mantovani E, Arduino PG, Schierano G, Ferrero L, Gallesio G, Mozzati M, Russo A, Scully C, Carossa S. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial to evaluate the performance of piezosurgery compared with traditional technique in lower wisdom tooth removal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Oct;72(10):1890-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 May 13.
- Sortino F, Pedulla E, Masoli V. The piezoelectric and rotatory osteotomy technique in impacted third molar surgery: comparison of postoperative recovery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Dec;66(12):2444-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.004.
- Goyal M, Marya K, Jhamb A, Chawla S, Sonoo PR, Singh V, Aggarwal A. Comparative evaluation of surgical outcome after removal of impacted mandibular third molars using a Piezotome or a conventional handpiece: a prospective study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Sep;50(6):556-61. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.10.010. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
- Barone A, Marconcini S, Giacomelli L, Rispoli L, Calvo JL, Covani U. A randomized clinical evaluation of ultrasound bone surgery versus traditional rotary instruments in lower third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Feb;68(2):330-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.03.053. Epub 2010 Jan 15. Erratum In: J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Apr 28;:
- Ge J, Yang C, Zheng JW, He DM, Zheng LY, Hu YK. Four osteotomy methods with piezosurgery to remove complicated mandibular third molars: a retrospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Nov;72(11):2126-33. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.05.028. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
November 1, 2022
Primary Completion (Actual)
April 1, 2023
Study Completion (Actual)
April 1, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 1, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 8, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
February 16, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
February 16, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 8, 2024
Last Verified
February 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Murat Kaan Erdem
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data will become available in 1 month and will be available for 2 years
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Impacted Third Molar Tooth
-
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityNot yet recruitingImpacted Third Molar Tooth | Third Molar Extraction
-
University of CataniaCompletedImpacted Third Molar Tooth | Third Molar SurgeryItaly
-
Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey UniversityRecruitingImpacted Third Molar ToothTurkey
-
University of BaghdadRecruiting
-
esengul senEnrolling by invitationImpacted Third Molar ToothTurkey
-
University of BaghdadCompletedImpacted Third Molar ToothIraq
-
zeynep cukurova yilmazCompletedImpacted Third Molar ToothTurkey
-
University of BaghdadCompletedImpacted Third Molar ToothIraq
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenCompletedImpacted Third Molar Tooth
-
Sun Yat-sen UniversityCompletedImpacted Third Molar Tooth
Clinical Trials on Piezosurgery
-
Matteo VisintinUnknown
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedThird Molars ExtractionSyrian Arab Republic
-
Konya Necmettin Erbakan ÜniversitesiCompletedImpacted Third Molar ToothTurkey
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedMalocclusion | Surgical Incision | Crowded TeethSyrian Arab Republic
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedMalocclusion, Angle Class IISyrian Arab Republic
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedMalocclusion | Surgical IncisionSyrian Arab Republic
-
Marmara UniversityCompletedImpacted Third Molar ToothTurkey
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedAngle Class IISyrian Arab Republic
-
Hams Hamed AbdelrahmanCompleted
-
Alexandria UniversityCompleted