Simulation for Operating Room Ergonomics (SORE)

March 12, 2026 updated by: Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Simulation for Operating Room Ergonomics - The SORE Study: Creating an Inter-disciplinary Simulation Curriculum for Operating Room Ergonomics

Ergonomics is the study of how people interact with, and work within an environment. This idea is especially important in a setting such as the operating room (OR), which can be both physically and mentally challenging. Poor ergonomic practices lead to physical discomfort and injuries in >50% of OR staff (surgeons, anesthesiologists, and nurses), impacting OR staff quality of life and leading to staff burnout and early retirement. The end result of which is reduced access to care for patients. Furthermore, the added mental effort of dealing with discomfort and pain can also increase the risk of errors and complications, affecting patient outcomes.

Despite high ergonomic stresses in the OR, and the existence of proven recommendations to address them, only a small number of OR staff are aware of ergonomic solutions and how to apply them. To bridge this gap between knowledge and application, we will assess the ergonomic needs of OR teams and develop an educational simulation curriculum to teach ergonomic recommendations to OR teams (surgery, anesthesiology, and nursing staff and trainees).

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

The Operating Room (OR) is a complex environment with many ergonomic stresses, including those related to patient movement, operative/anesthetic equipment, and surgical bed positioning. Systematic assessments of OR workload have shown that physical demands are at least as high as mental demands for OR teams.

Poor ergonomic management contributes to the high rate of musculoskeletal symptoms (e.g. neck stiffness and back pain) reported by surgeons, OR nurses, and anesthesiologists. These symptoms impact attentional resources and decision-making, increasing the risk of errors and complications. Furthermore, work-related musculoskeletal disorders lead to absenteeism, reduced career longevity, and burnout.

Ergonomic recommendations and interventions for OR staff, including table height adjustments, patient positioning, and placement of equipment, have been developed and proven effective. However, their usefulness is limited by a general lack of awareness and education among OR teams. Despite this, few formalized ergonomic education programs exist.

Furthermore, existing education programs address ergonomics at the individual-level only, and do not consider the interprofessional team environment, potentially limiting effectiveness. Team influence on ergonomics is reliant on non-technical skills such as communication and situational awareness. However, a busy OR environment, where the focus is rightly on patient safety, does not lend itself well to teaching ergonomic principles or providing live feedback. Fortunately, simulation-based training has repeatedly been shown to be an effective teaching tool for such skills. Simulation-based training is also generally positively perceived by medical learners.

With regard to ergonomics specifically, there is emerging evidence that simulation-based teaching can lead to improvements in focused areas of care, such as patient transfer. However, there is currently no simulation curriculum to teach operative ergonomics overall or as a team-based approach. Thus, comprehensive, interprofessional educational programs are needed to increase both awareness and application of ergonomics in the OR. Our study will build an interprofessional, team simulation curriculum involving surgery, anesthesiology, and nursing staff and trainees to address this critical gap in training.

Objectives

  1. Assess the perceived and unperceived ergonomic needs of OR teams (surgical, anesthesiology, and nursing staff and trainees).
  2. Develop and pilot an interdisciplinary OR ergonomics simulation curriculum for OR teams.

This exploratory study will take part in 2 Phases.

In Phase I, an interprofessional working group with representatives from surgery, anesthesiology, nursing, physiotherapy, chiropractic, medical education, simulation, and human factors engineering will identify gaps in OR ergonomics to inform the creation of the curriculum. Three strategies will be used to identify problems and assess needs in OR ergonomics: 1) initial literature review; 2) semi-structured stakeholder interviews, 3) direct observation of OR teams performing surgical procedures.

Phase II will involve development and piloting of the educational simulation curriculum with OR teams.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

28

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Toronto, Canada
        • Recruiting
        • Sunnybrook Research Institute
        • Contact:
          • Catherine Parry
          • Phone Number: 416-480-4276
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Fahad Alam, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

A purposive sample of OR stakeholders/teams, including surgeons, anesthesiologists, OR nurses and trainees.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Member of an OR team (surgery, anesthesiology or nursing staff or trainee) at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Stakeholder Interviews
Semi-structured, open-ended interviews will be conducted via Zoom with a purposive sample of surgeons, anesthesiologists and OR nurses and trainees to identify perceived OR ergonomics issues among stakeholders
OR Observations
Live observation of OR teams by teams of two observers (an anthropologist and an ergonomics expert, such as a chiropractor or physiotherapist). This will be done, in addition to the interview studies, to identify unperceived and misperceived needs using an observation data collection tool. Each of the following 4 phases of surgery will be assessed individually: 1) OR preparation (team arrival to wheels-in), 2) wheels-in to incision, 3) incision to closure, and 4) closure to wheels-out.
Curriculum Piloting
Participating OR teams will take part in piloting sessions of the developed simulation curriculum to determine if it meets the proposed content objectives and ensure environmental validity.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Development of OR ergonomics simulation curriculum
Time Frame: 18-24 months
The success of this project will be measured primarily by its development of the final product: an interdisciplinary simulation curriculum for OR ergonomics, with accompanying implementation tools (e.g. website), which is ready to be implemented
18-24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ability to obtain peer reviewed funding for effectiveness study
Time Frame: 18-24 months
Additional success would be measured by obtaining peer-reviewed funding for a multi-institution implementation and effectiveness assessment of the curriculum.
18-24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 18, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 5471

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Occupational Injuries

Subscribe