Head-up Tilt Sleeping to Alleviate Orthostatic Hypotension, Supine Hypertension and Nocturia in Parkinson's Disease

May 8, 2024 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center

The Heads-Up Trial: Sleeping in a Head-Up Tilt Position to Alleviate Orthostatic Hypotension, Supine Hypertension and Nocturia in Parkinson's Disease

Autonomic dysfunction is common and often underrecognized in Parkinson's disease (PD). Orthostatic hypotension (OH) affects up to a third of PD patients and often coincides with supine hypertension. This co-occurrence complicates pharmacological treatment as treatment of one can negatively affect the other. Head-up tilt sleeping (HUTS) could improve both. This phase II randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of this understudied intervention, leading to optimal implementation strategies.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Autonomic dysfunction is common and often underrecognized in Parkinson's disease (PD). Orthostatic hypotension (OH) affects up to a third of PD patients and about half of them also exhibit supine hypertension. In current clinical practice both are undertreated. The common co-occurrence of OH and supine hypertension complicates pharmacological treatment as improvement of one can be accomplished only at the expense of the other. Head-up tilt sleeping (HUTS) is the only intervention known that could improve both. The concept of HUTS is based on several small-scale observational studies and expert opinion. Although HUTS has been proposed as an effective and even first choice non-pharmacological treatment for OH for over three decades, it is often not advised to patients because of lack of evidence on its effectiveness and on how to implement it. The Heads-Up trial is a multicenter home-based double-blind phase II RCT. The study aims to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of HUTS, leading to optimal implementation strategies of HUTS to treat orthostatic hypotension and supine hypertension.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gelderland
      • Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6500 HB
        • Radboudumc
    • Zuid Holland
      • Leiden, Zuid Holland, Netherlands, 2333 ZA
        • Leiden University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Orthostatic hypotension defined as a systolic BP decrease of ≥20 mmHg, or a diastolic decrease of ≥10 mmHg, within 3 min after changing from a supine to standing position OR mean standing BP of ≤75 mmHg (marker for symptomatic orthostatic hypotension). In patients with supine hypertension, a decrease in systolic BP of ≥ 30 mmHg is required;
  • Orthostatic intolerance: direct complaints (dizziness, blurry vision, etc.) and/or indirect signs (falls or freezing episodes that relate to postural challenge);
  • Supine hypertension defined as a systolic BP of ≥140 mmHg, and/or diastolic of ≥90 mmHg, after 5 min of supine rest;
  • Idiopathic PD or parkinsonism (multiple system atrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal degeneration, vascular parkinsonism and Lewy body dementia);
  • Ability to walk (with or without a walking aid), as subjectively determined by the researcher;
  • Stable medication regimens for orthostatic hypotension and supine hypertension during the trial;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to follow instructions and complete questionnaires, as assessed by the researcher;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group
At T0, in-clinic inclusion, we will record basic characteristics and several questionnaires, we will also perform a short tilt-table-test and standing blood pressure (BP) test. Intake is followed by one week of horizontal sleeping for baseline home-based BP measurements. Participants in the intervention group will then sleep in a head-up tilt position for two weeks each in angles 6°, 12° and 18°. At the second and final in-clinic meeting, at T1, measurements done at T0 will be repeated, complemented with an assessment of barriers and facilitators of HUTS. During HUTS daily BP measurements will be done, and data will be collected on orthostatic tolerance, nighttime urine production, subjective comfort of HUTS, falls.
Whole-body head-up tilt sleeping (HUTS) will be carried out in three different angles, each for the duration of two weeks. Prior to the first angle the participant will sleep in a horizontal position for 1 week. The different angles will be installed using a wedge between the mattress and bed frame.
Other: Delayed intervention group
Follows the same structure as the intervention group, but starts with a HUTS placebo angle of 1° for two weeks, followed by two intervention angles of 6° and 12° for two weeks each. The 1°-angle serves as the control intervention.
Whole-body head-up tilt sleeping (HUTS) will be carried out in three different angles, each for the duration of two weeks. Prior to the first angle the participant will sleep in a horizontal position for 1 week. The different angles will be installed using a wedge between the mattress and bed frame.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average overnight supine blood pressure
Time Frame: Measured four times: in week 1, 3, 5 and 7
Average overnight supine blood pressure (mmHg) from the 24h ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM)
Measured four times: in week 1, 3, 5 and 7

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Daily supine blood pressure
Time Frame: Daily in week 1 up to and including week 7
Supine blood pressure (mmHg) measured every morning directly after awakening before getting out of bed
Daily in week 1 up to and including week 7
Orthostatic blood pressure
Time Frame: Measured six times: in-clinic (T0; pre-intervention), in week 1, 3, 5 and 7, and in-clinic on the day after week 7 ends (T1; post-intervention)
Standing orthostatic blood pressure test (mmHg). Measured in clinic and home-based guided by a researcher via video call.
Measured six times: in-clinic (T0; pre-intervention), in week 1, 3, 5 and 7, and in-clinic on the day after week 7 ends (T1; post-intervention)
24h ABPM parameters
Time Frame: In week 1, 3, 5 and 7
24h ABPM parameters blood pressure variability (mmHg), nocturnal blood pressure dipping (mmHg) and average daytime blood pressure (mmHg). Each of these measures will be derived from the 24 hour blood pressure measurements, and reported separately.
In week 1, 3, 5 and 7
Orthostatic tolerance
Time Frame: Week 1, 3, 5 and 7
Self-reported burden of symptoms of orthostatic hypotension (Orthostatic hypotension questionnaire (OHQ)). The score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher number meaning worse symptoms of orthostatic hypotension.
Week 1, 3, 5 and 7
Nocturia
Time Frame: Week 1, 3, 5 and 7
Self-reported frequency of daytime and night time urination and impact on quality of life (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Nocturia Module (ICIQ-N))
Week 1, 3, 5 and 7
Subjective comfort of HUTS (head up tilted sleeping)
Time Frame: Week 1, 3, 5 and 7
Self-reported tolerability of the head up tilted sleeping at different angles including questions about sleep duration, sleep quality and comfort, and feeling rested in the morning.
Week 1, 3, 5 and 7
Falls
Time Frame: Week 1, 3, 5 and 7
Self-reported falls and in case of a fall additional questions about the time and circumstances
Week 1, 3, 5 and 7
Overnight change in body weight
Time Frame: Daily in week 1 up to and including week 7
Weight (kg) difference between the evening and the morning, both measured after micturition
Daily in week 1 up to and including week 7
Nighttime urine production
Time Frame: Week 1, 3, 5 and 7
Urine volume measured in a urinal (ml)
Week 1, 3, 5 and 7
Barriers and facilitators of the intervention
Time Frame: Immediately post-intervention (day after week 7, T1)
Structured interview
Immediately post-intervention (day after week 7, T1)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Timed up and go test (TUG)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (day before week 1, T0) and post-intervention (day after week 7,T1)
Measurement of the time that the participant takes to rise from a chair, walk three meters, turn around 180 degrees, walk back to the chair, and sit down while turning 180 degrees
Pre-intervention (day before week 1, T0) and post-intervention (day after week 7,T1)
Symptoms of Parkinson's disease
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (day before week 1, T0) and post-intervention (day after week 7,T1)
Movement disorders society unified disease rating scale (MDS-UPDRS). Scores range from 0 to 199, with a higher score indicating a more severe impairment related to Parkinson's disease.
Pre-intervention (day before week 1, T0) and post-intervention (day after week 7,T1)
Quality of sleep
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (day before week 1, T0) and post-intervention (day after week 7,T1)
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Score ranges from 0 to 21, with 21 indicating a worse sleep quality.
Pre-intervention (day before week 1, T0) and post-intervention (day after week 7,T1)
Fear of falling
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (day before week 1, T0) and post-intervention (day after week 7,T1)
Falls Efficacy Scale (FES). Scores ranges from 16 to 67, with a higher score meaning a worse fear of falling.
Pre-intervention (day before week 1, T0) and post-intervention (day after week 7,T1)
Subjective level of physical activity
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (day before week 1, T0) and post-intervention (day after week 7,T1)
Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA) Physical Activity Questionnaire (LAPAQ). Score corresponds to time spend doing physical activities. A higher score indicates a more active last two weeks.
Pre-intervention (day before week 1, T0) and post-intervention (day after week 7,T1)
Cardiovascular autonomic symptoms
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (day before week 1, T0) and post-intervention (day after week 7,T1)
Selected cardiovascular questions from the Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease - Autonomic Dysfunction (SCOPA-AUT). Scored 0 to 9, a worse score means more symptoms of orthostatic hypotension.
Pre-intervention (day before week 1, T0) and post-intervention (day after week 7,T1)
Experienced quality of life
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (day before week 1, T0) and post-intervention (day after week 7,T1)
Quality of life questionnaire: the Parkinson's disease questionnaire (PDQ-39). Scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating a worse quality of life.
Pre-intervention (day before week 1, T0) and post-intervention (day after week 7,T1)
Experienced anxiety and depression
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (day before week 1, T0) and post-intervention (day after week 7,T1)
Quality of life questionnaire: the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). Scores range from 0 to 21 for depression and anxiety, a score between 0-7 means no anxiety or depression, 8-14 possibility of an anxiety or depressive disorder and 15-21 likely a depressive or anxiety disorder.
Pre-intervention (day before week 1, T0) and post-intervention (day after week 7,T1)
Mental health
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (day before week 1, T0) and post-intervention (day after week 7,T1)
Quality of life questionnaire: the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF). Scores range from 0 to 70, with a higher score meaning a better emotional wellbeing.
Pre-intervention (day before week 1, T0) and post-intervention (day after week 7,T1)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Roland D Thijs, MD, PhD, Leiden University Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 18, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 22, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Relevant and anonymized research data will be shared in the validated research database DANS Easy (Data Archiving and Networked Services). It will also be shared with the funding foundation (MJFF).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Study protocol and statistical analysis plan are shared with the funding foundation prior to the onset of the study. After completion of the measurements and analysis we will share the clinical study report with the funding foundation and place relevant and anonymized data on the DANS Easy database.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to the data is restricted, meaning that researchers who are interested in re-use of the data are asked to contact the central contact person for permission. Approval is given after a signed agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Head-up tilt sleeping

Subscribe