Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Tourniquet Use in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

October 13, 2022 updated by: mohamed hedi ezzine, Mongi Slim Hospital
Many surgeons choose to perform total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery with the aid of a tourniquet. A tourniquet is a device that fits around the leg and restricts blood flow to the limb. There is a need to understand whether tourniquets are safe, and if they benefit, or harm, patients. The aim of this study was to determine the benefits and harms of tourniquet use in TKA surgery

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

randomized controlled trials , comparing TKA with a tourniquet versus without a tourniquet. Outcomes included: post-operative pain measure with analogue visual scale function with Oxford Score , Lysholm score and International Knee Documentation Committee Score intraoperative blood loss measurement of quadriceps tonus in pre- and post-operative according to the international rating measurement of quadriceps area circumference duration of surgery, and length of hospital stay

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Osteoarthritis Kellgren and Lawrence score III or IV
  • Written consent
  • Total knee arthroplasty

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neurological dysfunction
  • Coagulation disorder
  • Glucocorticoids, aspirin, heparin, coumadine, warfarin
  • History of pulmonary embolism

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: tourniquet use
knee replacement surgery with the aid of a tourniquet - a tight band placed around the thigh that restricts blood flow to the knee.
Knee replacement, also called knee arthroplasty or total knee replacement, is a surgical procedure to resurface a knee damaged by arthritis. Metal and plastic parts are used to cap the ends of the bones that form the knee joint, along with the kneecap. This surgery may be considered for someone who has severe arthritis or a severe knee injury.
Sham Comparator: without tourniquet use
knee replacement surgery without the aid of a tourniquet - a tight band placed around the thigh that restricts blood flow to the knee.
Knee replacement, also called knee arthroplasty or total knee replacement, is a surgical procedure to resurface a knee damaged by arthritis. Metal and plastic parts are used to cap the ends of the bones that form the knee joint, along with the kneecap. This surgery may be considered for someone who has severe arthritis or a severe knee injury.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline
Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity. Based on the distribution of pain VAS scores in post-surgical patients, mild, moderate, or severe, the following cut points on the pain VAS have been recommended: no pain (0-4 mm), mild pain(5-44 mm), moderate pain (45-74 mm), and severe pain (75-100 mm).
Baseline
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Day 1
Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity. Based on the distribution of pain VAS scores in post-surgical patients, mild, moderate, or severe, the following cut points on the pain VAS have been recommended: no pain (0-4 mm), mild pain(5-44 mm), moderate pain (45-74 mm), and severe pain (75-100 mm).
Day 1
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Day 2
Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity. Based on the distribution of pain VAS scores in post-surgical patients, mild, moderate, or severe, the following cut points on the pain VAS have been recommended: no pain (0-4 mm), mild pain(5-44 mm), moderate pain (45-74 mm), and severe pain (75-100 mm).
Day 2
International Knee Documentation Committee 2000
Time Frame: Baseline
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) 2000 subjective score The score is interpreted as a measure of function such that higher scores represent higher levels of function and lower levels of symptoms. A score of 100 is interpreted to mean no limitation with activities of daily living or sports activities and the absence of symptoms.
Baseline
International Knee Documentation Committee 2000
Time Frame: Month 3
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) 2000 subjective score The score is interpreted as a measure of function such that higher scores represent higher levels of function and lower levels of symptoms. A score of 100 is interpreted to mean no limitation with activities of daily living or sports activities and the absence of symptoms.
Month 3
International Knee Documentation Committee 2000
Time Frame: Month 6
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) 2000 subjective score The score is interpreted as a measure of function such that higher scores represent higher levels of function and lower levels of symptoms. A score of 100 is interpreted to mean no limitation with activities of daily living or sports activities and the absence of symptoms.
Month 6
Oxford Score (OS)
Time Frame: Baseline

This score is a patient reported outcome measure that consists of 12 questions about an individual's level of function, activities of daily living and how they have been affected by pain over the preceding four weeks.

the scoring system from 0-4 where four is the best outcome and total scores range from 0 (poorest function) to 48 (maximal function)

Baseline
Oxford Score (OS)
Time Frame: Month 3

This score is a patient reported outcome measure that consists of 12 questions about an individual's level of function, activities of daily living and how they have been affected by pain over the preceding four weeks.

the scoring system from 0-4 where four is the best outcome and total scores range from 0 (poorest function) to 48 (maximal function)

Month 3
Oxford Score (OS)
Time Frame: Month 6

This score is a patient reported outcome measure that consists of 12 questions about an individual's level of function, activities of daily living and how they have been affected by pain over the preceding four weeks.

the scoring system from 0-4 where four is the best outcome and total scores range from 0 (poorest function) to 48 (maximal function)

Month 6
Lysholm score
Time Frame: Baseline
The Lysholm Scale currently consists of eight items that measure: pain (25 points), instability (25 points), locking (15 points), swelling (10 points), limp (5 points), stair climbing (10 points), squatting (5 points), and need for support (5 points). Every question response has been assigned an arbitrary score on an increasing scale. The total score is the sum of each response to the eight questions and may range from 0-100. Higher scores indicate a better outcome with fewer symptoms or disabilities
Baseline
Lysholm score
Time Frame: Month 3
The Lysholm Scale currently consists of eight items that measure: pain (25 points), instability (25 points), locking (15 points), swelling (10 points), limp (5 points), stair climbing (10 points), squatting (5 points), and need for support (5 points). Every question response has been assigned an arbitrary score on an increasing scale. The total score is the sum of each response to the eight questions and may range from 0-100. Higher scores indicate a better outcome with fewer symptoms or disabilities
Month 3
Lysholm score
Time Frame: Month 6
The Lysholm Scale currently consists of eight items that measure: pain (25 points), instability (25 points), locking (15 points), swelling (10 points), limp (5 points), stair climbing (10 points), squatting (5 points), and need for support (5 points). Every question response has been assigned an arbitrary score on an increasing scale. The total score is the sum of each response to the eight questions and may range from 0-100. Higher scores indicate a better outcome with fewer symptoms or disabilities
Month 6
perioperative blood loss
Time Frame: Hospital admission to discharge (about 3 days)
intraoperative blood loss estimation in ml added to postoperative drainage
Hospital admission to discharge (about 3 days)
quadriceps area circumference
Time Frame: Baseline
Measurement of thigh is usually performed 15 cm proximal to the superior pole of the patella. The thigh circumference is measured in cm with a measurement tape and compared to the normal contralateral knee to determine the amount of quadriceps atrophy present
Baseline
quadriceps area circumference
Time Frame: Month 3
Measurement of thigh is usually performed 15 cm proximal to the superior pole of the patella. The thigh circumference is measured in cm with a measurement tape and compared to the normal contralateral knee to determine the amount of quadriceps atrophy present
Month 3
quadriceps area circumference
Time Frame: Month 6
Measurement of thigh is usually performed 15 cm proximal to the superior pole of the patella. The thigh circumference is measured in cm with a measurement tape and compared to the normal contralateral knee to determine the amount of quadriceps atrophy present
Month 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

October 10, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 10, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 10, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 1, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • mongislim2

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Total Knee Arthroplasty

Clinical Trials on total knee arthroplasty(TKA)

Subscribe