Leveraging Autism Intervention for Families Using Telehealth (LIFT) (LIFT)

October 31, 2022 updated by: University of Oregon
The purpose of the LIFT study is to develop a technology-assisted adaptation of the JASPER (Joint Attention, Symbolic Play, Engagement, and Regulation: Kasari et al., 2021) social communication intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). In partnership with community early intervention (EI) and early childhood special education (ECSE) practitioners in Oregon, implementation strategies to help caregivers learn to the use the intervention strategies with their young children will delivered in a pilot randomized trial. The pilot trial will compare primarily self-directed learning through online materials and brief practitioner support (ONLINE) with the addition of live synchronous coaching (ONLINE + COACH) on caregivers' strategy use (primary) and children's joint engagement and social communication (secondary).

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 2 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Receiving Early Intervention (EI) or Early Childhood Special Education (ECSE) services from partnered providers in Southern Oregon Education Service District (SOESD).
  • Child has received or is awaiting a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Child is not receiving services from a partnered educational service district

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ONLINE

This strategy will primarily include self-directed family access to the online JASPER modules developed for this project. The online modules follow a stepped hierarchy beginning with foundational concepts (e.g., engagement states) and systematically adding new concepts and strategies each week (e.g., balancing imitation and modeling, play routines). Access to the modules will be paired with a weekly brief (20 minute) check-in call provided by a community interventionist. The call is designed to create a space for the caregiver to ask questions about the week's content and to provide basic troubleshooting for implementation.

Slower responders to phase 1 ONLINE intervention will intensify to receive COACH in phase 2.

The ONLINE intervention applies the JASPER (Joint Attention, Symbolic Play, Engagement, and Regulation: Kasari et al., 2021) social communication intervention for young children with autism. The JASPER approach has been tested in a caregiver-mediated format where caregivers are taught to use the JASPER strategies with their children during play and home routine (e.g., Kasari et al., 2010; Kasari et al., 2014). The JASPER intervention is being adapted in this study to include online web based materials.
Experimental: ONLINE + COACH

Families randomized to add coaching will receive access to the ONLINE intervention program as described above. However, every second check in call will be shifted to a 45-minute live coaching session with their community interventionist. The coaching session will begin with a brief check-in and review of the target content for the session. This will be followed by support to set up the environment. The child will then join the interaction and the interventionist will provide real time coaching supports for the caregiver to practice the intervention strategies with their child. The session will end with a short discussion to debrief on the practice session.

Slower responders to phase 1 ONLINE + COACH intervention will intensify in phase 2 where check in calls are modified to include video feedback and review.

The ONLINE intervention applies the JASPER (Joint Attention, Symbolic Play, Engagement, and Regulation: Kasari et al., 2021) social communication intervention for young children with autism. The JASPER approach has been tested in a caregiver-mediated format where caregivers are taught to use the JASPER strategies with their children during play and home routine (e.g., Kasari et al., 2010; Kasari et al., 2014). The JASPER intervention is being adapted in this study to include online web based materials.
COACH includes live synchronous caregiver coaching in the JASPER intervention model. Coaching follows prior published JASPER caregiver coaching protocols (e.g., Shire, Shih, Barriault, & Kasari, 2022). This implementation strategy has been tested in a pilot study when applied by community early intervention providers (Shire, Baker Worthman, & Arbuckle, 2021).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Acceptability: Caregiver Diary
Time Frame: Entry, Early Response (6 weeks), Exit (12 weeks), Follow up (24 weeks)
Caregivers' ratings of their strategy use, confidence, and interest in using the strategies with their child. Each item is rating on a scale of 0-5 with higher score indicating greater acceptability.
Entry, Early Response (6 weeks), Exit (12 weeks), Follow up (24 weeks)
Change in Adoption: Caregiver Involvement Scale
Time Frame: Entry, Early Response (6 weeks), Exit (12 weeks), Follow up (24 weeks)
Using the Caregiver Involvement Scale, interventionists will rate caregivers' comfort, confidence, and accurate usage of the strategies with their child using seven questions rated from 1 (not comfortable) to 5 (very comfortable). Higher scores indicate greater adoption.
Entry, Early Response (6 weeks), Exit (12 weeks), Follow up (24 weeks)
Change in Fidelity: JASPER Coaching Fidelity
Time Frame: Coaching session 1 (week 1), last session of phase 1 (week 6), last session of phase 2 (week 12)
Interventionists' JASPER coaching will be measured to assess the local providers' ability to accurately deliver the intervention across families. The items are rated from 0 (strategy is missing) to 5 (high quality, consistent and appropriate strategy use) and are summed to obtain a total coaching fidelity percentage score. High scores indicate greater coaching fidelity.
Coaching session 1 (week 1), last session of phase 1 (week 6), last session of phase 2 (week 12)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Caregivers' JASPER Strategy Use: JASPER Implementation Fidelity
Time Frame: Entry, Early Response (6 weeks), Exit (12 weeks), Follow up (24 weeks)
Total JASPER Implementation Fidelity (percentage). Each item is rated on a score of 0 (skill is not present) through 5 (high quality, consistent use of the skill/strategy). Higher scores indicate greater use of JASPER strategies.
Entry, Early Response (6 weeks), Exit (12 weeks), Follow up (24 weeks)
Change in Children's Time in Child Initiated Joint Engagement (Caregiver Child Interaction)
Time Frame: Entry, Early Response (6 weeks), Exit (12 weeks), Follow up (24 weeks)
Duration (time in seconds) the child is in a child initiated joint engaged state during the caregiver child interaction.
Entry, Early Response (6 weeks), Exit (12 weeks), Follow up (24 weeks)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Initiations of Joint Attention (Short Play and Communication Evaluation)
Time Frame: Entry, Exit (12 weeks), Follow up (24 weeks)
Nonverbal and Spoken spontaneous initiations of joint attention coded by independent raters from the Short Play and Communication Evaluation (SPACE)
Entry, Exit (12 weeks), Follow up (24 weeks)
Change in Play diversity (Short Play and Communication Evaluation)
Time Frame: Entry, Exit (12 weeks), Follow up (24 weeks)
Number of different spontaneous play actions across play levels coded by independent raters from the SPACE
Entry, Exit (12 weeks), Follow up (24 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stephanie Y Shire, PhD, University of Oregon

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

November 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 17, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 3, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Autism Spectrum Disorder

Clinical Trials on ONLINE

Subscribe