Randomized Assessment of TcMS for VT Storm

August 16, 2023 updated by: University of Pennsylvania

Randomized Assessment of the Efficacy of Transcutaneous Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Ventricular Tachycardia Storm

Three-arm randomized clinical trial comparing two strategies of TcMS to sham stimulation in patients with VT storm. The hypothesis of the study is that TcMS will reduce the burden of VT in the 24 hours after randomization compared to sham stimulation and that TcMS with theta burst stimulation (TBS) will be more effective at reducing VT burden than low frequency TcMS.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
        • Contact:
          • Timothy Markman, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥3 episodes of sustained VT or appropriate ICD therapies within 24 hours despite the use of at least one antiarrhythmic drug

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Plan for catheter ablation of VT in the next 24 hours
  • Pregnancy
  • Contraindication to TcMS (i.e. implantable ventricular assist device, metal implanted in the head or neck [except the mouth], implanted medication pumps, cochlear implant, implanted brain stimulator, ocular implant, history of malignancy in the neck)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Sham Stimulation
With the coil directed away from the patient, 600 pulses of TcMS will be delivered at minimal energy output.
Transcutaneous Magnetic Stimulation
Active Comparator: Low Frequency TcMS
With the coil directed at the stellate ganglion, 60 minutes of 1Hz stimulation will be delivered targeting the stellate ganglion.
Transcutaneous Magnetic Stimulation
Active Comparator: Theta Burst Stimulation TcMS
With the coil directed at the stellate ganglion, 600 pulses of continuous theta burst stimulation will be delivered targeting the stellate ganglion.
Transcutaneous Magnetic Stimulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VT Burden (24 hours)
Time Frame: 24 hours after randomization
Number of episodes of sustained ventricular tachycardia
24 hours after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VT burden (72 hours)
Time Frame: 72 hours after randomization
Number of episodes of sustained ventricular tachycardia
72 hours after randomization
Freedom from VT
Time Frame: 24 hours after randomization
Freedom from sustained VT
24 hours after randomization
Blood Pressure
Time Frame: Immediately before and after stimulation
Change in mean arterial blood pressure
Immediately before and after stimulation
Heart Rate
Time Frame: Immediately before and after stimulation
Change in heart rate
Immediately before and after stimulation
Pain
Time Frame: Immediately after stimulation
Pain at site of stimulation (0-10 scale)
Immediately after stimulation
Lead sensing
Time Frame: Immediately before and after stimulation
Change in implantable device lead sensing
Immediately before and after stimulation
Lead threshold
Time Frame: Immediately before and after stimulation
Change in implantable device lead pacing threshold
Immediately before and after stimulation
Lead impedance
Time Frame: Immediately before and after stimulation
Change in implantable device lead pacing impedance
Immediately before and after stimulation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 24, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ventricular Tachycardia

Clinical Trials on Magnetic Stimulation

3
Subscribe