- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05611333
A Behavioral Science-Enhanced PHysician-led Remote Group Exercise InTervention for Women With Coronary Artery Disease (BE-PHIT)
BE-PHIT: a Behavioral Science-Enhanced PHysician-led Remote Group Exercise InTervention for Women With Coronary Artery Disease
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study will employ a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) design to compare an intervention group and a control group receiving usual care.
The pilot RCT will include 60 sedentary adult women with a history of stable coronary artery disease (CAD) who will be randomized to the intervention arm (4-week physician-led remote exercise program) or usual care. The primary outcome will be change in minutes/week of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) at 4 weeks, which will be measured with Fitbit trackers provided to all participants. Secondary outcomes will include change in MVPA at 12 weeks, the proportion of patients achieving guidelines-recommended volumes of physical activity (PA) at 4 and 12 weeks, change in minutes of sedentary time per week at 4 and 12 weeks, change in cardiometabolic health measures (e.g. self-reported weight, blood pressure, and resting heart rate), and change in survey-based measures of self determination, intrinsic motivation, well-being, and quality of life. Additional feasibility outcomes will include satisfaction, and likelihood to recommend.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Age 40-80 years 2. Female sex 3. Diagnosis of coronary artery disease that meets criteria for one of the following:
a. Stable obstructive CAD i. A history of myocardial infarction (MI) at least 12 months prior to enrollment, history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), and/or history of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with
- Coronary angiogram completed at time of diagnosis with MI or completion of CABG/PCI AND
- Stress test (completed within 12 months after diagnosis of MI OR within 5 years prior to enrollment) OR
Absence of anginal symptoms following revascularization ii. Previous imaging (e.g. coronary computed tomographic angiography [CCTA] or coronary angiography) demonstrating any stenosis 50% or greater in the left main coronary artery, 70% or greater in any other coronary artery, or both.
b. Non-obstructive CAD i. Previous imaging (e.g. CCTA or coronary angiography) with/without additional stress testing demonstrating coronary artery stenosis 1 to 49% in the left main coronary artery or 1-70% in any other epicardial coronary artery with or without stress testing negative for ischemia.
ii. Previous imaging (e.g. calcium scoring or conventional computed tomography) demonstrating calcified coronary artery plaque with or without stress testing negative for ischemia.
- Completed visit with Mass General Brigham (MGB) cardiologist within 12 months prior to enrollment
- Self-reported physical inactivity (any amount of PA less than guideline-recommended amount of 150 minutes/week of at least moderate intensity aerobic exercise)10 as reported on the brief "Exercise as a Vital Sign" (EVS) instrument11
- Ability to ambulate independently
- Possession of and ability to use a computer and/or smart device with video conferencing capability
- Possession of and willing to use a home scale daily.
- Willing to use a Fitbit activity tracker daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
- A history of conditions that limit or contraindicate exercise (e.g., myocardial infarction within 48 hours, unstable angina, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, severe aortic stenosis, uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmias, myocarditis, acute pulmonary embolism, severe pulmonary hypertension, aortic dissection, hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, hypertension greater than 200/110 mmHg, known obstruction of the left coronary artery)
- Musculoskeletal or plantar wounds/injuries
- Severe mental or cognitive disabilities
- Inability to speak English
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Control
Participants in the control group will continue with usual care.
All participants will be asked to wear Fitbit activity trackers to track steps every day and to regularly use blood pressure cuffs to measure blood pressure at home.
All participants will also be asked to complete a brief set of surveys at the beginning of the study, after 4 weeks, and after 12 weeks.
|
|
|
Experimental: Physician-Led Remote Exercise Program Intervention
Participants randomized to the intervention arm will attend three 45-minute walking sessions over Zoom per week for 4 weeks.
All participants will be asked to wear Fitbit activity trackers to track steps every day and to regularly use blood pressure cuffs to measure blood pressure at home.
All participants will also be asked to complete a brief set of surveys at the beginning of the study, after 4 weeks, and after 12 weeks.
|
The physician-led remote exercise program intervention consists of three 45-minute walking classes on Zoom per week for 4 weeks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in minutes of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA)/week
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
This will be assessed based on documented physical activity on Fitbit devices provided to all participants.
A third-party research application program interface (API) called Fitabase (Small Steps Labs, LLC, San Diego, CA) will be used to exporting the data from the Fitbit at 60-second sampling intervals.
Using its proprietary algorithm, the Fitbit tracker will convert raw acceleration data into activity counts in 60-s sampling intervals that define activity intensities as 0 = sedentary, 1 = light PA, 2 = moderate PA, and 3 = vigorous PA.
MVPA minutes per week will be extracted through Fitabase (Semanik et al., 2019).
|
4 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in minutes of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA)/week
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
This will be assessed based on documented physical activity on Fitbit devices provided to all participants.
Fitabase (Small Steps Labs, LLC, San Diego, CA) will be used to exporting the data from the Fitbit at 60-second sampling intervals.
Using its proprietary algorithm, the Fitbit tracker will convert raw acceleration data into activity counts in 60-s sampling intervals that define activity intensities as 0 = sedentary, 1 = light PA, 2 = moderate PA, and 3 = vigorous PA.
MVPA minutes per week will be extracted through Fitabase (Semanik et al., 2019).
|
12 weeks
|
|
Proportion of patients achieving guideline-recommended volume of physical activity
Time Frame: 4 weeks and 12 weeks
|
Standard clinical guidelines recommend 150 minutes/week of moderate intensity or 75 minutes/week of vigorous intensity physical activity (Fihn et al., 2012).
This will be measured based on objective physical activity captured on Fitbit devices provided to all participants.
Fitabase (Small Steps Labs, LLC, San Diego, CA) will be used to exporting the data from the Fitbit at 60-second sampling intervals.
Using its proprietary algorithm, the Fitbit tracker will convert raw acceleration data into activity counts in 60-s sampling intervals that define activity intensities as 0 = sedentary, 1 = light PA, 2 = moderate PA, and 3 = vigorous PA.
MVPA minutes per week will be extracted through Fitabase (Semanik et al., 2019).
|
4 weeks and 12 weeks
|
|
Change in minutes of sedentary time/week
Time Frame: 4 weeks and 12 weeks
|
Fitabase (Small Steps Labs, LLC, San Diego, CA) will be used to exporting the data from the Fitbit at 60-second sampling intervals.
Using its proprietary algorithm, the Fitbit tracker will convert raw acceleration data into activity counts in 60-s sampling intervals that define activity intensities as 0 = sedentary, 1 = light PA, 2 = moderate PA, and 3 = vigorous PA (Redenius et al., 2019).
Sedentary time per week will be extracted through Fitabase.
|
4 weeks and 12 weeks
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-reported physical activity
Time Frame: 4 and 12 weeks
|
This will be assessed by the validated Exercise as a Vital Sign instrument (Grant et al., 2014).
|
4 and 12 weeks
|
|
Change in weight (kg)
Time Frame: 4 and 12 weeks
|
This will be assessed based on reported weights by participants
|
4 and 12 weeks
|
|
Change in blood pressure (mmHg)
Time Frame: 4 and 12 weeks
|
This will be assessed based on reported home blood pressure measurements using study-provided automatic blood pressure cuffs.
|
4 and 12 weeks
|
|
Change in resting heart rate (bpm)
Time Frame: 4 and 12 weeks
|
This will be determined from Fitbit tracker data.
Fitabase (Small Steps Labs, LLC, San Diego, CA) will be used to exporting the data from the Fitbit at 60-second sampling intervals.
Resting heart rate data will be extracted through Fitabase.
|
4 and 12 weeks
|
|
Self-determination
Time Frame: 4 and 12 weeks
|
Self-determination is a psychology framework for human motivation and behavior that posits that individuals adopt and persist in activities when they are intrinsically motivated or when they have extrinsic motivation modulated by the belief that such activities are consistent with one's identity or that they will result in important outcomes (Teixeira et al., 2012).
Self-determination will be assessed by administration of the validated Exercise Regulations Questionnaire (Wilson et al., 2006).
|
4 and 12 weeks
|
|
Psychological need satisfaction
Time Frame: 4 and 12 weeks
|
Fulfillment of psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness is a key driver of intrinsic motivation.
Therefore, psychological need satisfaction will be assessed by the validated Psychological Need Satisfaction in Exercise Scale (Wilson et al, 2006).
|
4 and 12 weeks
|
|
Well-being
Time Frame: 4 and 12 weeks
|
Health-related well-being will be assessed by the validated WHO-5 Well-Being Scale (Topp et al., 2015).
|
4 and 12 weeks
|
|
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: 4 and 12 weeks
|
Health-related quality of life will be assessed by the validated Short Form-36 Survey (Failde et al., 2000).
|
4 and 12 weeks
|
|
General satisfaction
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
General satisfaction with the exercise program will be assessed among participants randomized to the intervention arm with a 5-point Likert scale general satisfaction survey where 1 = very dissatisfied and 5 = very satisfied.
|
4 weeks
|
|
Likelihood to recommend
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
The likelihood to recommend the exercise program will be assessed in intervention participants with the validated Net Promoter Score where 1 = not at all likely to recommend and 10 = very likely to recommend.
|
4 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Simin G Lee, MD, Brigham and Women's Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Topp CW, Ostergaard SD, Sondergaard S, Bech P. The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: a systematic review of the literature. Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(3):167-76. doi: 10.1159/000376585. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
- Nowbar AN, Gitto M, Howard JP, Francis DP, Al-Lamee R. Mortality From Ischemic Heart Disease. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Jun;12(6):e005375. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005375. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
- Lawler PR, Filion KB, Eisenberg MJ. Efficacy of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation post-myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am Heart J. 2011 Oct;162(4):571-584.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.07.017. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
- Minges KE, Strait KM, Owen N, Dunstan DW, Camhi SM, Lichtman J, Geda M, Dreyer RP, Bueno H, Beltrame JF, Curtis JP, Krumholz HM. Gender differences in physical activity following acute myocardial infarction in adults: A prospective, observational study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 Jan;24(2):192-203. doi: 10.1177/2047487316679905. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
- Gorczyca AM, Eaton CB, LaMonte MJ, Manson JE, Johnston JD, Bidulescu A, Waring ME, Manini T, Martin LW, Stefanick ML, He K, Chomistek AK. Change in Physical Activity and Sitting Time After Myocardial Infarction and Mortality Among Postmenopausal Women in the Women's Health Initiative-Observational Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 May 15;6(5):e005354. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005354.
- Smith JR, Thomas RJ, Bonikowske AR, Hammer SM, Olson TP. Sex Differences in Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcomes. Circ Res. 2022 Feb 18;130(4):552-565. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319894. Epub 2022 Feb 17. Erratum In: Circ Res. 2022 Mar 18;130(6):e22.
- Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, Berra K, Blankenship JC, Dallas AP, Douglas PS, Foody JM, Gerber TC, Hinderliter AL, King SB 3rd, Kligfield PD, Krumholz HM, Kwong RY, Lim MJ, Linderbaum JA, Mack MJ, Munger MA, Prager RL, Sabik JF, Shaw LJ, Sikkema JD, Smith CR Jr, Smith SC Jr, Spertus JA, Williams SV; American College of Cardiology Foundation. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2012 Dec 18;126(25):3097-137. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182776f83. Epub 2012 Nov 19. No abstract available. Erratum In: Circulation. 2014 Apr 22;129(16):e462.
- Grant RW, Schmittdiel JA, Neugebauer RS, Uratsu CS, Sternfeld B. Exercise as a vital sign: a quasi-experimental analysis of a health system intervention to collect patient-reported exercise levels. J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Feb;29(2):341-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2693-9. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
- Teixeira PJ, Carraca EV, Markland D, Silva MN, Ryan RM. Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Jun 22;9:78. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-78.
- Wilson PM, Rodgers WM, Loitz CC, Sclme G, Wilson PM. "It's Who I Am … Really!' The Importance of Integrated Regulation in Exercise Contexts. J Appl Biobehav Res. 2006;11(2):79-104.
- Wilson PM, Rogers WT, Rodgers WM, Wild TC. The psychological need satisfaction in exercise scale. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2006;28(3):231-251.
- Failde I, Ramos I. Validity and reliability of the SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire in patients with coronary artery disease. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Apr;53(4):359-65. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00175-4.
- Redenius N, Kim Y, Byun W. Concurrent validity of the Fitbit for assessing sedentary behavior and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Feb 7;19(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0668-1.
- Semanik P, Lee J, Pellegrini CA, Song J, Dunlop DD, Chang RW. Comparison of Physical Activity Measures Derived From the Fitbit Flex and the ActiGraph GT3X+ in an Employee Population With Chronic Knee Symptoms. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2020 Jan;2(1):48-52. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11099. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2022P002541
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.