Bisphosphonates Use After Total Joint Arthroplasty

November 20, 2022 updated by: Jen-Ta Shih, National Defense Medical Center, Taiwan

Postoperative Use of Bisphosphonates Reduces Adverse Outcome After Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Nationwide Population-based Cohort Study

Background Bisphosphonates has been associated with a decreased risk of revision total joint replacements because of its effects on decreased periprosthetic bone loss and prosthetic migration. However, the results in the early literature are inconsistent and the influence of bisphosphonates on associated complications and subsequent total joint arthroplasty (TJA) remains unknown. This study is to investigate the association between the use of bisphosphonates and risk of adverse outcomes after primary TJA.

Materials and Methods This matched cohort study utilized National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan to identify patients who underwent primary TJA over a 15-year period (January 2000- December 2015 inclusive). Study participants were further categorized into two groups: bisphosphonates users and nonusers, using propensity score matching. The Kaplan-Meier curve analysis and adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) of revision surgery, adverse outcomes of primary surgery and undergoing subsequent TJA were calculated using Cox regression analysis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

27405

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan, 11472
        • Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) was used to identify diagnoses and related procedures. The target cohort in NHIRD were those who underwent primary total joint arthroplasty during the study period (January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2015).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who underwent primary total joint arthroplasty during the study period (January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2015).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with total joint arthroplasty before the index date,
  2. Patients with existing pathologic fracture, nonunion of fracture and partial joint replacement,
  3. Patients who were lost to follow-up
  4. Patients < 40 years old

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Other

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
bisphosphonates users
Patients who underwent primary total joint arthroplasty with bisphosphonates use
bisphosphonates nonusers
Patients who underwent primary total joint arthroplasty without bisphosphonates use

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
revision rate of joint arthroplasty
Time Frame: a 15-year period (January 2000- December 2015 inclusive)
revision rate of joint arthroplasty after primary surgery
a 15-year period (January 2000- December 2015 inclusive)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The rate of secondary total joint arthroplasty
Time Frame: a 15-year period (January 2000- December 2015 inclusive)
The rate of secondary total joint arthroplasty
a 15-year period (January 2000- December 2015 inclusive)
The rate of periprosthetic joint infection
Time Frame: a 15-year period (January 2000- December 2015 inclusive)
The rate of periprosthetic joint infection
a 15-year period (January 2000- December 2015 inclusive)
The rate of periprosthetic fracture
Time Frame: a 15-year period (January 2000- December 2015 inclusive)
The rate of periprosthetic fracture
a 15-year period (January 2000- December 2015 inclusive)
Mortality rate
Time Frame: a 15-year period (January 2000- December 2015 inclusive)
Mortality rate
a 15-year period (January 2000- December 2015 inclusive)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2000

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

November 2, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 22, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

There is no plans to make individual participant data (IPD) available to other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diphosphonates

Clinical Trials on Bisphosphonates, Combinations

Subscribe