Cost-effectiveness Evaluation of Robotic Surgery in the Removal of Lung Lesions in the ATS of Milan

Cost-effectiveness Evaluation of Robotic Surgery, Compared to Thoracoscopic and Open Surgery, in the Removal of Lung Lesions Based on "Real-world" Efficacy and Cost Data From the ATS of Milan

The goal of this observational study is to compare cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery with open surgery and video-assisted thoracoscopy surgery (VATS) in adult patients, resident in the ATS of Milan area, operated for lung cancer.

The main question it aims to answer is:

• Is the robotic surgery cost-effective compared with thoracotomy and VATS in the surgical treatment of operable lung cancers in the adult population of the ATS of Milan?

Researchers will compare robotic surgery with open and VAT surgery of operable lung cancer to see if robotic surgery performs better in terms of cost per year of life gained or in terms of cost per quality of life earned.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Single multicenter retrospective observational study with Real World Evidence (RWE) approach, i.e. an evaluation that uses real-world data (RWD) derived from healthcare flows of the ATS of Milan and data provided by participating centers on the basis of medical records/ clinical databases, both as regards the analysis of efficacy and safety and as regards the economic evaluation of direct costs.

For the analysis of quality of life and the calculation of QALYs (quality-adjusted life years), validated questionnaires will be prospectively administered to the participating subjects. The Epidemiology Unit of the ATS of Milan is the study promoter and it will coordinate the collection of data and will carry out the statistical and economic analyses. Other participating centers will be the thoracic surgeries of the ATS hospitals, which carried out in 2019 (last pre-pandemic COVID-19 year) at least 50 lung operations.

As for the retrospective part of the study, both for the evaluation of clinical efficacy and of costs, the investigators will include all adult subjects (age equal or over 18 years of age at the time of surgery) residents in the ATS of Milan, who were hospitalized between 01/01/2016 and 31/12/2021 for pulmonary surgery (operation codes in any position of the hospital discharge summary form (SDO-Scheda di Dimissione Ospedaliera) and whose hospitalization is present in the SDO database of the ATS of Milan in one of the participating centers. For the evaluation of cost-effectiveness in malignant tumors, subjects with metastases at diagnosis will be excluded.

As for the prospective part of the study, all subjects who will undergo lung surgery during 2023 at the participating centers and will give their consent to participate in the study by signing the informed consent form at the pre-hospitalization or at hospitalization before surgery will be eligible to be enrolled. To evaluate the quality of life PROMs related, the investigators will use the generic questionnaire EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L) and the specific European Organization for Researchand Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lung Cancer (EORCT QLQ-LC29), which are available and validated in Italian. The pre-intervention questionnaire will be completed on paper during hospitalization before the intervention or at pre-admission and the data will be entered into the web application of the ATS of Milan by dedicated staff. The subsequent questionnaires at day 7 and 30 can be self-completed by patients or electronically, using the dedicated web application of the ATS of Milan or in paper form, by filling in the documents issued on discharge for this purpose

The cost-effectiveness evaluation will be conducted according to the CHEERS (Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards) guidelines.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

5400

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The retrospective study will include all adult subjects (age equal or over 18 years of age at the time of surgery) residents in the ATS of Milan, who were hospitalized between 01/01/2016 and 31/12/2021 for pulmonary surgery and whose hospitalization is present in the hospital discharge summary form database of the ATS of Milan in one of the participating centers. For the evaluation of cost-effectiveness in malignant tumors, subjects with metastases at diagnosis will be excluded.

As for the prospective part of the study, all subjects who will undergo lung surgery during the first six month of 2023 at the participating centers and will give their consent to participate in the study by signing the informed consent form at the pre-hospitalization or at hospitalization before surgery will be eligible to be enrolled

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Retrospective study

  • Patients operated on for a lung tumor in the participating Centers from 01/01/2016 to 12/31/2021
  • Residents in the ATS of Milan area
  • Hospitalization is present in the hospital discharge summary form database of the ATS of Milan

Prospective study

  • Patients operated on for lung tumor in the participating Centers from 01/01/2023 to 06/30/2023, who give their consent to be enrolled in the study
  • Residents in the ATS of Milan area

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Other

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Robotic surgery
Patients who have undergone pulmonary robotic surgery
Surgical treatment of operable lung cancers using robotic systems
VAT surgery
Patients who have undergone pulmonary video-assisted thoracoscopy surgery (VATS)
Surgical treatment of operable lung cancers using a video-assisted thoracoscopy approach (VAT)
Open surgery
Patients who have undergone pulmonary open surgery
Surgical treatment of operable lung cancers using open surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incremental Cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of robotic surgery for the treatment of operable lung cancer
Time Frame: The time horizon of the evaluation will be limited to 5 years from the intervention and the purchase of the technology.
The ICER of robotic surgery compared with both VATS and open surgery is defined as the ratio between incremental costs associated with robotic surgery and the variation in effectiveness. Costs will be measured in Euros. Effectiveness will be considered both in terms of life years gained, measured in years, and in terms of quality of life gained, measured in QALY. In the first case, ICER will be measured as Euros/years; in the second, it will be measured as Euros/QALY. It will be evaluated in the treatment of operable lung cancer.
The time horizon of the evaluation will be limited to 5 years from the intervention and the purchase of the technology.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incremental Cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of robotic surgery for the treatment of benign lung lesions
Time Frame: The time horizon of the evaluation will be limited to 5 years from the intervention and the purchase of the technology.
The ICER of robotic surgery compared with both VATS and open surgery will be evaluated in the treatment of benign lesions in the same population considered for the primary outcome. ICER is defined as the ratio between incremental costs associated with robotic surgery and the variation in effectiveness. Costs will be measured in Euros. Effectiveness will be considered both in terms of life years gained, measured in years, and in terms of quality of life gained, measured in QALY. In the first case, ICER will be measured as Euros/years; in the second, it will be measured as Euros/QALY.
The time horizon of the evaluation will be limited to 5 years from the intervention and the purchase of the technology.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2022

First Posted (Estimate)

January 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2699

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Robotic surgery

Subscribe