Multi-Reader, Multi-Case, Cross-Over, Retrospective Study to Evaluate Effectiveness of Lunit INSIGHT DBT

February 9, 2023 updated by: Lunit Inc.

Multi-Reader, Multi-Case, Cross-Over, Retrospective, Superiority, Pivotal Study to Evaluate Effectiveness of Lunit INSIGHT DBT in the Assistance of Detection and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer During 3D Mammography Interpretation

This study aims to evaluate Effectiveness of Lunit INSIGHT DBT in the assistance of detection and diagnosis of breast cancer during 3D mammography interpretation

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The primary objective of the trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of Lunit INSIGHT DBT in the assistance of detection and diagnosis of breast cancer by comparing the clinical performance of radiologists before and after using Lunit INSIGHT DBT in their DBT reading and secondarily examining the use of Lunit INSIGHT DBT to shorten DBT reading time.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

262

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Annapolis, Maryland, United States, 21401
        • Recruiting
        • Anne Arundel Medical Center
        • Contact:
          • Julie Oda, MD
          • Phone Number: 254-654-2908
          • Email: joda@aah.org

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Mainly from a tertiary hospital but no limitation of enrollment

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

[For All Subject Groups]

  • Female
  • 22 years old or older

[For 'Control (Non-cancer)' Group]

  • Negative Cases Interpreted as BI-RADS 0 (Assessment Incomplete) or BI-RADS 1 (Negative) with no cancers on the DBT exam and confirmed as BI-RADS 1 (Negative) on the further diagnostic imaging (e.g., MMG, DBT, MRI, CT and Ultrasound) taken at least after 1 year of the DBT exam.
  • Benign Cases Interpreted as BI-RADS 0 (Assessment Incomplete) or BI-RADS 2 (Benign) with a visible lesion on the DBT exam and confirmed as BI-RADS 2 (Benign) on the further diagnostic imaging (e.g., MMG, DBT, MRI, CT and Ultrasound) taken at least after 1 year of the DBT exam without a further breast biopsy.

Or for the biopsy-proven benign exams, interpreted as BI-RADS 0 (Assessment Incomplete), BI-RADS 3 (Probably Benign), 4 (Suspicious) or 5 (Highly Suggestive of Malignancy) with a visible suspicious lesion for breast cancer on the DBT exam but confirmed as benign through subsequent biopsy conducted within following 1 year of the DBT exam.

[For 'Condition (Cancer)' Group] Interpreted as BI-RADS 0 (Assessment Incomplete), BI-RADS 3 (Probably Benign), 4 (Suspicious) or 5 (Highly Suggestive of Malignancy) with a visible suspicious lesion for breast cancer on the DBT exam and confirmed as a cancer (malignant) through the subsequent biopsy conducted within following 1 year of the DBT exam.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous breast cancer
  • Previous vacuum-assisted biopsy, surgical biopsy or surgery in breast
  • Presence of a breast implant or pacemaker on the required images: 4 views (RCC, RMLO, LCC, LMLO) images of Screening or diagnostic DBT exams with a FFDM (Full-Field Digital mammography) image or with a synthetic 2D image

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Cancer group
Interpreted as BI-RADS 0 (Assessment Incomplete), BI-RADS 3 (Probably Benign), 4 (Suspicious) or 5 (Highly Suggestive of Malignancy) with a visible suspicious lesion for breast cancer on the DBT exam and confirmed as a cancer (malignant) through the subsequent biopsy conducted within following 1 year of the DBT exam.
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) is a type of 3D mammography that creates detailed images of the breast tissue. It uses X-rays to take multiple images at different angles and combines them to create a clear, layered view of the breast tissue. DBT is used for breast cancer screening and diagnosis and provides a more accurate view of the breast tissue compared to traditional 2D mammography.
Non-Cancer group

Negative Cases

▪ Interpreted as BI-RADS 0 (Assessment Incomplete) or BI-RADS 1 (Negative) with no cancers on the DBT exam and confirmed as BI-RADS 1 (Negative) on the further diagnostic imaging (e.g., MMG, DBT, MRI, CT and Ultrasound) taken at least after 1 year of the DBT exam.

Benign Cases

  • Interpreted as BI-RADS 0 (Assessment Incomplete) or BI-RADS 2 (Benign) with a visible lesion on the DBT exam and confirmed as BI-RADS 2 (Benign) on the further diagnostic imaging (e.g., MMG, DBT, MRI, CT and Ultrasound) taken at least after 1 year of the DBT exam without a further breast biopsy.
  • Or for the biopsy-proven benign exams, interpreted as BI-RADS 0 (Assessment Incomplete), BI-RADS 3 (Probably Benign), 4 (Suspicious) or 5 (Highly Suggestive of Malignancy) with a visible suspicious lesion for breast cancer on the DBT exam but confirmed as benign through subsequent biopsy conducted within following 1 year of the DBT exam.
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) is a type of 3D mammography that creates detailed images of the breast tissue. It uses X-rays to take multiple images at different angles and combines them to create a clear, layered view of the breast tissue. DBT is used for breast cancer screening and diagnosis and provides a more accurate view of the breast tissue compared to traditional 2D mammography.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effectiveness of Lunit INSIGHT DBT
Time Frame: 3 months after the 1st tomosynthesis reading
Patient-level LOS (Level of Suspicion) area under the ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve
3 months after the 1st tomosynthesis reading

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Kihwan Kim, MD, Lunit Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 22, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 28, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 28, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 30, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2023

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 8, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • LUN_DBT_121

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis

Subscribe