Medial Flap Coblation Turbinoplasty Versus Submucous Resection

February 21, 2023 updated by: Mansoura University
Both submucous resection and medial flap coblation turbinoplasty are equally effective and safe in relieving nasal obstruction and enabling optimal volume reduction with preservation of function of the inferior turbinate. Coblation turbinoplasty has superior outcomes in terms of better healing and less bleeding, postoperative pain and crusting. Medial flap turbinoplasty is a simple, minimally invasive easy to learn procedure with low morbidity and excellent long-lasting results.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This prospective, randomized, comparative surgical trial was conducted in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mansoura University, Egypt, over a period of 2 years (March 2020 - March 2022). The study included 90 adult patients with chronic nasal obstruction due to inferior turbinate hypertrophy, and not responding to the usual medical treatment (intranasal corticosteroid therapy for at least 3 months).

Patients with other causes of nasal obstruction such as chronic rhinosinusitis, sinonasal tumours and nasal septal deflections were excluded from the study. Additionally, patients with history of previous nasal surgeries were also excluded. All patients of the study (n=90) received prior medical treatment in the form of decongestants and intranasal corticosteroids with no improvement.

Patients of the study were randomly allocated into two groups using block randomization method: coblation medial flap turbinoplasty group (n=45), and submucous resection (SMR) group (n=45). The patients were blind to the procedure they had. Informed written consents were obtained from all participants (n=90), and the study was approved by the Mansoura Faculty of Medicine Institutional research board (MFM-IRB: R.22.09.1853).

All patients (n=90) were subjected for detailed history taking with special focus on the nasal symptoms.

Additionally, an objective assessment for the nasal airways was performed before and after surgery by rigid nasal endoscopic examination without using nasal decongestants. The inferior turbinate grading system that was applied by Camacho et al was adopted in the current study. It was classified into 4 grades: grade 1 (inferior turbinate occupying 0%-25% of total airway space), grade 2 (occupying 26%-50% of total airway space), grade 3 (occupying51%-75% of total airway space), grade 4 (occupying 76%-100% of total airway space).

Operative techniques:

All surgeries were performed under general anaesthesia. Patients were prepped and draped in the standard fashion for endoscopic sinus surgery, and by using a zero-degree rigid nasal endoscope, under video imaging.

Submucous resection (SMR):

After infiltration of the inferior turbinate with 1 to 2 ml of 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine solution, an incision was done along the infero-medial surface of the turbinate extending from posterior to anterior. Medial and lateral mucosal flaps were then elevated, followed by resection of the turbinate bone. Then, flaps were returned back into position

Medial flap coblation turbinoplasty:

Turbinoplasty was performed using Coblation II surgery system (Smith and Nephew, USA) with EVAC 70 wand set to: ablation power 7 and coagulation power 3. After infiltration with 1 to 2 ml of 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, inferior turbinate in-fracture was done by using a Cottle dissector. The mucous membrane as well as the soft tissues of the lateral side of the inferior turbinate were excised in an anterior to posterior direction using the coblation in ablation mode. The turbinate bone was then dissected from the medial mucosa (raising a medial flap), by a Cottle dissector. The bone was removed, and haemostasis was adequately achieved by using the coblation in the coagulation mode for bleeding points. The medial flap was then repositioned inferiorly and laterally to cover the remining expoNo nasal packing was performed in both groups (n=90). Patients were discharged home on the next postoperative day. Oral antibiotics (amoxicillin-clavulanic acid) were prescribed for one week. Saline nasal wash was prescribed for 2 - 3 weeks postoperatively. Follow up visits were planned on a weekly basis for one month, then after 3 months and 6 months.sed part of the inferior turbinate.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Mansoura, Egypt, 35511
        • Mansoura University Faculty of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult patients with chronic nasal obstruction due to inferior turbinate hypertrophy not responding to the conventional treatment; mainly intranasal steroid spray for 3 months duratoin.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with other causes of nasal obstruction such as chronic rhinosinusitis, sinonasal tumours and nasal septal deflections

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Medial Flap Coblation Turbinoplasty
Reduction of the inferior turbinate to manage inferior turbinate hypertrophy
Active Comparator: Submucous Resection
Submucous Resection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
improvement of nasal breathing
Time Frame: within 6 months after surgery
subjectively assessed preoperatively and postoperatively by using the NOSE scale, objective assessment of the size of the inferior turbinate by endoscope. The inferior turbinate grading system that was applied by Camacho et al was adopted in the current study. It was classified into 4 grades: grade 1 (inferior turbinate occupying 0%-25% of total airway space), grade 2 (occupying 26%-50% of total airway space), grade 3 (occupying51%-75% of total airway space), grade 4 (occupying 76%-100% of total airway space).
within 6 months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intra-operative bleeding
Time Frame: during surgery
it was assessed by using the Boezaart surgical field grading scale as the following: Grade 0: no bleeding 'cadaveric condition', Grade 1: minimal bleeding, no required suction, Grade 2:minimal bleeding, occasional suction is required, Grade 3: minimal bleeding, frequent suction is needed, surgical field is threatened by bleeding few seconds after removal of suction, Grade 4: bleeding is moderate, frequent suction is required and surgical field is threatened by bleeding immediately after removal of suction, Grade 5: bleeding is severe, persistent suction is needed and surgical field is severely threatened by bleeding which can't be controlled by suction
during surgery
Post operative pain
Time Frame: within 10 days afte surgery
it was assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS), where the patient was asked to score the pain from 1 to 10 and was graded as following; zero: no problem, 1-3: mild problem, 4-7: moderate problem, and 8-10: severe problem.
within 10 days afte surgery
Intra-nasal crustations
Time Frame: within 3 months after surgery
it was evaluated according to the endoscopic score of "Lund and Kennedy", as the following: Grade 0: Absence of crustations, Grade 1: Mild crustations: partially filling the nasal cavity, Grade 2: Severe crustations: fully filling the nasal cavity.
within 3 months after surgery
Post-operative healing
Time Frame: within 3 months after surgery
it was was evaluated also as regard Lund and kennedy, as the following: Good: if there are minimal crustations, fast mucosal re-epithelization, patient feels recovered from nasal symptoms, no nasal synechiae, Moderate: mild to moderate degree of crustations, mucosal re-epithelization, patient feels relief of nasal symptoms, with nasal synechiae, Poor: severe crustations and nasal synechiae, delayed mucosal re-epithelization patient doesn't feel relief of nasal symptoms, persistent inflammations and infection
within 3 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2023

First Posted (Estimate)

February 22, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MFM-IRB: R.22.09.1853

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy

Clinical Trials on Medial Flap Coblation Turbinoplasty

Subscribe