ACtive Children Enhance LEaRning and AttenTION: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) (ACCELERATION)

May 5, 2023 updated by: University of Houston

A Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) of the Impact of School-based Sport Research Program on Children's Physical Activity, Executive Function, and Academic Achievement

The goal of this clinical trial is to test the effectiveness of sport-based physical education (PE) curriculum on activity behaviors (moderate to vigorous physical activity and sedentary behavior), executive functions, and academic performance in elementary school-aged children, particularly among low-income ethnic minorities. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Whether a school-based sport program can improve child engagement in school-time moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and total daily MVPA, compared to a control group (standard PE class)?
  • Whether a school-based sport program can improve child executive functions and academic performance, compared to a control group (standard PE class)?

Participants randomized to receive the ACtive Children Enhance LEaRning and AttenTION (ACCELERATION) intervention (treatment) received

  • 45-minute weekly for 10 weeks soccer (ball mastery exercises) curriculum led by trained PE teachers during the school PE lesson time.
  • Homework required practicing learned ball mastery skills daily for 15-20 minutes at home. A required ball was provided to them.
  • Virtual parent workshops, which required the attendance of parents of study participants to improve their understanding of all about the program

Researchers will compare the control group, who received a regular PE class curriculum, to see if there are any differences in child activity behaviors, executive functions, and academic performance.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

257

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77099
        • KIPP Houston Public Schools

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years to 11 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Any student enrolled in 3rd or 4th-grade classes were eligible to participate in the study.
  2. Participation in an extracurricular sports activity wasn't an exclusion criterion for this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Students were excluded if they had serious physical (e.g., asthma, heart diseases), developmental (e.g., autism, attention-deficit hyperactivity), or learning (e.g., dyslexia, dyscalculia, dysgraphia) disorders that prevented them from participating in intervention activities
  2. Students who participated in a physical activity intervention within the last 6 months were excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ACCELERATION
Both study arms occurred during participants' PE class, once a week for 45 minutes for 10 weeks. The ACCELERATION curriculum is designed to improve children's MVPA through learning and practicing new and challenging sport skills in a fun and free-will learning environment that includes not only school but also home environment. The ACCELERATION focuses on introducing the ball to the child at a basic level. Ball mastery is a soccer term that simply refers to the ability to manipulate and play with the ball using all parts of the foot. Since this program was an individual pursuit, not a team endeavor, it was imperative that each student has their own ball during the PE class. The trained undergraduate interns assisted PE teachers to deliver this program to classrooms assigned into the treatment arm. The program trains parents via virtual workshops on delivering the program at home.
A diverse group of key informants (i.e., PE teachers, school athletic department director) and community stakeholders (i.e., professional soccer coaches, Houston Dynamo Academy director) were engaged to help the research team design, modify, and implement the ACCELERATION curriculum to ensure program relevance and appeal. There are several components that described below make our program design both comprehensive and highly adaptable for optimal reach and effectiveness. These include staff development training, parent workshops, on-site and virtual developmental programs, delivery and implementation support from community stakeholders, online resources, family engagement events, equipment donations to improve activity, and on-going support and mentoring services for parents and school-based educators.
No Intervention: Standard PE
Classrooms assigned to the control group received a 45-minute weekly regular PE curriculum for 10 weeks designed to meet state-mandated requirements. For the same research school, a standard PE curriculum was also delivered by the same PE teacher who delivered the intervention curriculum. However, additional training and support were not provided to PE teachers for the implementation of a regular PE curriculum.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in the Average Accelerometer-measured MVPA/day at 10 weeks
Time Frame: baseline and post (immediate after 10 weeks of the intervention)
MVPA behaviors were assessed objectively with accelerometers (GT3X+ Actigraph, Pensacola, FL). Trained research staff instructed the students to wear the accelerometer on the right hip for 8 days, which allowed participant to adapt to wearing the device and to achieve the study goal of 2 valid wear days per child as consistent with school-based evaluations. A valid day were defined as ≥600 minutes wear time per day. Freedson's age specific cut points for children 6 to 18 years old will be used to determine the intensity of activity.
baseline and post (immediate after 10 weeks of the intervention)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in the Average Accelerometer-measured Sedentary Time/day at 10 weeks
Time Frame: baseline and post (immediate after 10 weeks of the intervention)
Sedentary behaviors were assessed objectively with accelerometers (GT3X+ Actigraph, Pensacola, FL). Trained research staff instructed the students to wear the accelerometer on the right hip for 8 days, which allowed participant to adapt to wearing the device and to achieve the study goal of 2 valid wear days per child as consistent with school-based evaluations. A valid day were defined as ≥600 minutes wear time per day. Freedson's age specific cut points for children 6 to 18 years old will be used to determine the intensity of activity.
baseline and post (immediate after 10 weeks of the intervention)
Change from Baseline in the Mean Dimensional Change Card Sort Test Score at 10 weeks
Time Frame: baseline and post (immediate after 10 weeks of the intervention)
NIH Toolbox (appropriate for ages 7+) iPad Cognitive Battery utilized to deliver Dimensional Change Card Sort Test. This task measured the cognitive flexibility of children. Children were shown an on-screen target image and instructed to select one of two images matching the target on either shape or color.
baseline and post (immediate after 10 weeks of the intervention)
Change from Baseline in the Mean Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test Score at 10 weeks
Time Frame: baseline and post (immediate after 10 weeks of the intervention)
NIH Toolbox (appropriate for ages 7+) iPad Cognitive Battery utilized to deliver Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test. For this task, children were shown an arrow flanked by two additional arrows on each side and instructed to choose an on-screen button matching the direction of the middle arrow.
baseline and post (immediate after 10 weeks of the intervention)
Change from Baseline in the Mean Picture Sequence Memory Task Score at 10 weeks
Time Frame: baseline and post (immediate after 10 weeks of the intervention)
NIH Toolbox (appropriate for ages 7+) iPad Cognitive Battery utilized to deliver Picture Sequence Memory Task. Children were shown a narrated sequence of images corresponding to common activities- "How to go to the Park", followed by images depicting children playing on swings, feeding ducks. The same sequence was repeated and the participant was asked to recall the proper sequence.
baseline and post (immediate after 10 weeks of the intervention)
Change from Baseline in the Mean the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) Standardized Test Scores at 10 weeks
Time Frame: baseline and post (immediate after 10 weeks of the intervention)
This test emphasizes students' readiness for success in the grade that follows by assessing the knowledge attained in the current grade level. Students in 3rd and 4th grade are tested on the following subjects, reading, mathematics.
baseline and post (immediate after 10 weeks of the intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Craig A Johnston, PhD, University of Houston

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 2, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 13, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 29, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 9, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY00003226

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Physical Inactivity

Clinical Trials on ACtive Children Enhance LEaRning and AttenTION (ACCELERATION)

Subscribe