- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05811104
Accelerated High-dose Sequential Bilateral Theta Burst Stimulation for Treatment Resistant Depression
Accelerated High-dose Sequential Bilateral Theta Burst Stimulation for Treatment Resistant Depression: A Randomized Double-Blind Sham-controlled Pilot Study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Major depressive disorder (MDD) accounts for the highest global burden of all mental health disorders, and approximately 50% of depressed patients meet criteria for treatment resistant of depression. Stimulation based therapies have recently become a promising alternative for patients with treatment resistant depression. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is approved by the US. Food and Drug administration (FDA) and has been recommended as a viable treatment option for major depression. Recently, a newer form of rTMS called Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is approved by FDA as it has shown comparable clinical efficacy and safety to rTMS in the treatment of depression. TBS is more efficient than rTMS as it requires shorter stimulation time of ≤ 6min compared to 20-40 min required in conventional rTMS protocol and produces equivalent antidepressant responses.
Studies suggest that the efficacy of TBS could be enhanced and expedited by accelerated protocols (more than once daily sessions ranging from 2-10 sessions/day) higher doses of stimulation (>600 TBS pulses up to 3600 pulses per session) with shorter duration of treatment (4-10days). Recently, an accelerated Stanford Neuromodulation Therapy protocol (10 sessions of iTBS a day for 5 days) with high dose stimulation (90,000 pulses in total) was found to be more effective than sham for severe TRD. This protocol yielded robust results with 69.2% response rates compared to 13% in sham during the 4-week outcome period .
The main goal of this project is to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of accelerated high dose bilateral TBS treatment for TRD in comparison to sham stimulation using a randomized double blind clinical trial design. The second objective is to examine the durability of antidepressant effect of this treatment protocol. Our initial open label study of accelerated high dose bilateral TBS demonstrated efficacy in a small cohort of participants with TRD. This proposed study builds on our initial findings whether the antidepressant efficacy of accelerated high dose bilateral TBS would be significantly greater than an identical schedule of sham stimulation. This pilot study will help to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and tolerability of treatment protocol, and estimate the sample size for the next pivotal trial. Hypotheses: Accounting this is a pilot study using small sample size without power size calculations, it is not designed for hypothesis testing. However, it is predicted that the accelerated bilateral TBS would be clinically effective and safe in the treatment of patients with TRD compared to sham stimulation. Additionally, it is anticipated that the antidepressant effects of this treatment may be durable.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Rajamannar Ramasubbu, MD
- Phone Number: 403-471-4794
- Email: rramasub@ucalgary.ca
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of MDD (DSM-V)
- Adults in the age range of 18 - 65
- Both sex
- HAMD-17 score of ≥20
- TRD - failure to two antidepressant trial Stage II (Thase and Rush classification)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Post traumatic stress disorder,
- Obsessive compulsive disorder,
- Psychosis
- Bipolar disorder,
- substance abuse disorder,
- autistic spectrum disorder,
- active suicidal behavior
- Epilepsy
- Dementia,
- Movement disorders
- severe head injury
- Brain metallic implants, cardiac pacemakers
- Pregnancy .
- Non-response to prior rTMS, Electroconvulsive treatment, Vagal nerve or Deep brain stimulation or a history of psychosurgery.
- Borderline personality disorder,
- Schizotypal, schizoid & paranoid personality disorder
- Current treatment with anticonvulsants or benzodiazepines
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Active stimulation
Bilateral real TBS
|
Three sessions of active or sham bilateral TBS will be delivered daily for 10 days in 2 weeks (no session on weekend) with a total of 30 sessions for each patient.
Daily low intensity (90% resting motor threshold) bilateral sequential continousTBS ( cTBI) will be applied first on the right DLPFC (1800 pulses) and then intermittent TBS (iTBS)on the left DLPFC (1800 pulses) with an intersession interval of 60 minutes.
We will adopt 1800 pulse per session based on the previous studies.
Patients will receive a stimulation of 3600 pulses a session, 10,800 pulses a day and 108,000 pulses in total.
After the study, sham group will receive active stimulation following the same protocol
|
Sham Comparator: Sham stimulation
Bilateral Sham stimulation
|
Three sessions of active or sham bilateral TBS will be delivered daily for 10 days in 2 weeks (no session on weekend) with a total of 30 sessions for each patient.
Daily low intensity (90% resting motor threshold) bilateral sequential continousTBS ( cTBI) will be applied first on the right DLPFC (1800 pulses) and then intermittent TBS (iTBS)on the left DLPFC (1800 pulses) with an intersession interval of 60 minutes.
We will adopt 1800 pulse per session based on the previous studies.
Patients will receive a stimulation of 3600 pulses a session, 10,800 pulses a day and 108,000 pulses in total.
After the study, sham group will receive active stimulation following the same protocol
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Time Frame: Baseline to week 4 post treatment
|
Mean change in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores (0-60) from baseline to week 4 post treatment.
Higher scores mean worse outcome.
|
Baseline to week 4 post treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17(HDRS-17)
Time Frame: Baseline to week 4 post treatment
|
Mean change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17(HDRS-17) scores (0-52) from baseline to week 4 post treatment.
Higher scores mean worse outcome
|
Baseline to week 4 post treatment
|
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology- Self Report (QIDS-SR)
Time Frame: Baseline to week 4 post treatment
|
Mean change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology- Self Report (QIDS-SR) scores (0-27) from baseline to week 4 post treatment.
Higher scores mean worse outcome.
|
Baseline to week 4 post treatment
|
Columbia scale of suicidal behavior (CSS)
Time Frame: Baseline to week 4 post treatment
|
Mean change in Columbia scale of suicidal behavior (CSS) scores (2-25) from baseline to week 4 post treatment.
Higher scores mean worse outcome.
|
Baseline to week 4 post treatment
|
World Health Organization Quality of Life ( WHOQOL) BREF
Time Frame: Baseline to week 4 post treatment
|
Mean change in Quality of Life- ( WHOQOL) BREF - scores ( 0-100) from baseline to week 4 post treatment.
Higher scores mean better outcome.
|
Baseline to week 4 post treatment
|
Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI)
Time Frame: Baseline to week 4 post treatment
|
Mean change from Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) ( 1-7) baseline to week 4 post treatment.
Higher scores mean worse outcome
|
Baseline to week 4 post treatment
|
Categorical outcomes
Time Frame: At 4 week post treatment
|
Response (a reduction ≥ 50% in MADRS from the baseline to 4 weekend point) and remission (MADRS score ≤ 10) rates for each group
|
At 4 week post treatment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Rajamannar Ramasubbu, MD, University of Calgary
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Lisanby SH, Husain MM, Rosenquist PB, Maixner D, Gutierrez R, Krystal A, Gilmer W, Marangell LB, Aaronson S, Daskalakis ZJ, Canterbury R, Richelson E, Sackeim HA, George MS. Daily left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the acute treatment of major depression: clinical predictors of outcome in a multisite, randomized controlled clinical trial. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009 Jan;34(2):522-34. doi: 10.1038/npp.2008.118. Epub 2008 Aug 13.
- Thomas L, Kessler D, Campbell J, Morrison J, Peters TJ, Williams C, Lewis G, Wiles N. Prevalence of treatment-resistant depression in primary care: cross-sectional data. Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Dec;63(617):e852-8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X675430.
- Levkovitz Y, Isserles M, Padberg F, Lisanby SH, Bystritsky A, Xia G, Tendler A, Daskalakis ZJ, Winston JL, Dannon P, Hafez HM, Reti IM, Morales OG, Schlaepfer TE, Hollander E, Berman JA, Husain MM, Sofer U, Stein A, Adler S, Deutsch L, Deutsch F, Roth Y, George MS, Zangen A. Efficacy and safety of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. World Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;14(1):64-73. doi: 10.1002/wps.20199.
- Blumberger DM, Vila-Rodriguez F, Thorpe KE, Feffer K, Noda Y, Giacobbe P, Knyahnytska Y, Kennedy SH, Lam RW, Daskalakis ZJ, Downar J. Effectiveness of theta burst versus high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with depression (THREE-D): a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018 Apr 28;391(10131):1683-1692. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30295-2. Epub 2018 Apr 26. Erratum In: Lancet. 2018 Jun 23;391(10139):e24.
- Cole EJ, Phillips AL, Bentzley BS, Stimpson KH, Nejad R, Barmak F, Veerapal C, Khan N, Cherian K, Felber E, Brown R, Choi E, King S, Pankow H, Bishop JH, Azeez A, Coetzee J, Rapier R, Odenwald N, Carreon D, Hawkins J, Chang M, Keller J, Raj K, DeBattista C, Jo B, Espil FM, Schatzberg AF, Sudheimer KD, Williams NR. Stanford Neuromodulation Therapy (SNT): A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;179(2):132-141. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2021.20101429. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
- Voigt JD, Leuchter AF, Carpenter LL. Theta burst stimulation for the acute treatment of major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Psychiatry. 2021 May 28;11(1):330. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01441-4.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 10021798
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Treatment Resistant Depression
-
Changping LaboratoryBeijing HuiLongGuan HospitalRecruitingTreatment-Resistant DepressionChina
-
Central Institute of Mental Health, MannheimCharite University, Berlin, Germany; German Federal Ministry of Education and... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingTreatment-resistant DepressionGermany
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompletedTreatment-resistant DepressionUnited States, Australia, France, United Kingdom, Belgium, Germany, Taiwan, Spain, Argentina, Mexico, Poland, Bulgaria, Malaysia, South Africa, Turkey, Finland, Korea, Republic of, Brazil, Austria, Sweden, Lithuania
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompletedTreatment-resistant DepressionUnited States, France, Belgium, Mexico, Canada, Brazil, Estonia, Hungary, Slovakia
-
University of OttawaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)Completed
-
GH Research Ireland LimitedRecruitingTreatment-resistant DepressionIreland, Czechia
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang UniversityRecruitingTreatment-resistant DepressionChina
-
University Hospital FreiburgBoston Scientific CorporationRecruitingTreatment-resistant DepressionGermany, France
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompletedTreatment-resistant DepressionUnited States, Poland, Germany, Spain, Czechia
-
Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.WithdrawnTreatment-Resistant Depression
Clinical Trials on Sequential bilateral theta burst stimulation
-
Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health SciencesSunnybrook Health Sciences CentreRecruitingDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantCanada
-
Centre for Addiction and Mental HealthRecruitingAutism Spectrum Disorder | Major Depressive DisorderCanada
-
Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria La FeInstituto de Salud Carlos III; Hospital Universitario La Fe; Spanish Agency of...RecruitingBipolar Depression | Resistant Depression, TreatmentSpain
-
Erika ForbesNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Completed
-
Centre for Addiction and Mental HealthUniversity Health Network, TorontoRecruiting
-
Nicholas Balderston, PhDRecruiting
-
University of California, Los AngelesNational Institute on Aging (NIA)RecruitingCognitive Dysfunction | Memory Disorders in Old AgeUnited States
-
King's College LondonSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustRecruiting
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalCompletedCerebral Vascular AccidentTaiwan
-
Changping LaboratoryNot yet recruitingAphasia | Stroke, Ischemic