Network-targeted Theta-burst Stimulation for Episodic Memory Improvement in Mild Cognitive Impairment

March 8, 2024 updated by: Nanthia Suthana, University of California, Los Angeles
The purpose of this study is to see if stimulation of the brain can improve memory. The investigators will use a device called transcranial magnetic stimulation that can stimulate and activate a specific part of the brain that is important for memory. The study will enroll MCI subjects and subjects with subjective memory complaints who will be randomly assigned to receive active or sham brain stimulation. 'Blinded' or 'sham-controlled' means that the subject will not know whether the treatment they receive is the active treatment or the non-active stimulation. In the 'sham' condition, the stimulator will turn on but will not actually be stimulating the target brain region.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90024
        • Recruiting
        • University of California Los Angeles
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Agreement to participate in the study
  • 55-100 years of age
  • Right-handedness
  • In good general health
  • Living independently
  • Subjective memory complaints (self-report and positive score on MFQ)
  • Katz ADL scale and Lawton iADL scale: We will review scores on a case-by-case basis if they did not score 100%. We will exclude if the scores show impairment in ADLs that suggests problems with independent functioning due to cognitive impairment.
  • MMSE score > 24
  • PHQ Depression score =< 7
  • Ability to read, write, and speak English fluently
  • Diagnosis of mild neurocognitive disorder according to DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) criteria. Participants with subjective memory complaints without an aMCI diagnosis will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis based on neuropsychological scores. Participants scoring a raw score of 0 or 3 standard deviations below normative expectations on the long delay recall in two or more of the three tasks (BVMT-R, RCFT, and CVLT-III) will be excluded.
  • No change in use of psychotropic medication for treatment of depression, anxiety, ADHS or psychosis 1 month prior and during the study.

Screening diagnostic criteria for aMCI will be subjective memory complaints, intact instrumental and basic activities of daily living (Smith et al., 1996), PHQ, MMSE, BVMT-R (25-minute delay), CVLT-II (20-minute delay), Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Task (30-minute delay). Baseline assessments will include neuropsychological testing of all study subjects.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwilling or unable to provide informed consent
  • Diagnosis of dementia
  • Active major medical, psychiatric, or neurologic disorder associated with neurocognitive impairment
  • History of alcohol or substance abuse
  • Recent (< 6 months) alcohol or substance abuse (excluding nicotine or caffeine)
  • History of stroke (if the stroke in our judgment is related to the memory problem), traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness, or other neurologic disorder (e.g., epilepsy, Huntington's disease, Parkinson's disease)
  • Non-English speaking participants
  • Not right handed based on self-report or evaluation based on a standard report
  • Has received TMS before (not TMS naïve)
  • Poorly controlled hypertension or cardiovascular disease
  • Current enrollment in a memory-enhancement study or course
  • Contraindication to TMS or MRI including claustrophobia, metal in body, surgery within 60 days, certain implants, or previous abnormal MRI results.
  • scanning facial tattoos is okay if safe with MRI
  • is taking:

    • anticholinergic medication (e.g., Detrol, Cogentin);
    • sedating antihistamine (e.g., Benadryl);
    • any drug that has significant anticholinergic or antihistaminic side effects (e.g., tricyclic antidepressant medications, Remeron).
    • benzodiazepines. While not a strict rule out, this will be decided on a case-by-case basis depending on the dose.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active TBS
Theta burst stimulation (TBS) will be delivered at 100% of motor threshold (MT).
Theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TBS) will be delivered at 80-100% of motor threshold (MT).
Sham Comparator: Sham TBS
Sham stimulation will be delivered at 0% of motor threshold (MT), with all other parameters matching the active TBS condition.
Sham stimulation will be delivered at 0-10% of motor threshold (MT), with all other parameters matching the active TBS condition.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Verbal recall performance change
Time Frame: Baseline: Day 2; During stimulation: Day 3, Day 7, Day 12, Day 17; Follow-up appointments: Day 18, Day 19, Day 20.
Verbal memory will be measured using a free recall task where participants learn a list of everyday words and are asked to recall as many words as they can remember after a period of distraction. Proportion of recollected words will be used to quantify memory performance changes.
Baseline: Day 2; During stimulation: Day 3, Day 7, Day 12, Day 17; Follow-up appointments: Day 18, Day 19, Day 20.
Object recognition memory performance change
Time Frame: Baseline: Day 2; During stimulation: Day 3, Day 7, Day 12, Day 17; Follow-up appointments: Day 18, Day 19, Day 20.
Object memory will be measured using an recognition task where participants view photos of everyday objects and are asked to identify them as OLD or NEW during a memory test wherein unseen novel objects and very similar but new photos of identical objects are shown. Recollection and discrimination index will be used to quantify memory performance changes.
Baseline: Day 2; During stimulation: Day 3, Day 7, Day 12, Day 17; Follow-up appointments: Day 18, Day 19, Day 20.
Associative memory performance change
Time Frame: Baseline: Day 2; During stimulation: Day 3, Day 7, Day 12, Day 17; Follow-up appointments: Day 18, Day 19, Day 20.
Associative memory will be tested using the Face Name Memory Test wherein participants are shown faces and associated names. Participants are then shown faces only and asked to recall the associated name.
Baseline: Day 2; During stimulation: Day 3, Day 7, Day 12, Day 17; Follow-up appointments: Day 18, Day 19, Day 20.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resting state fMRI functional connectivity
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 2) before the first treatment and after the last treatment (Day 17)
Resting state fMRI activity will be measured before the first and after the last TBS treatment
Baseline (Day 2) before the first treatment and after the last treatment (Day 17)
EEG activity
Time Frame: During treatment (Days 3, 7 and 12), after the last treatment (Day 17), and 2 month follow-up session (Day 20)
EEG functional connectivity with stimulated region and medial temporal source localized power in the theta band will be recorded during a resting period as well as during the treatment itself both before and after treatments
During treatment (Days 3, 7 and 12), after the last treatment (Day 17), and 2 month follow-up session (Day 20)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nanthia Suthana, University of California, Los Angeles

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 26, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 22, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data collected for this research represent a valuable resource to the scientific community, and the PIs will make them accessible to others, while respecting the special needs for confidentiality. All data will be anonymized before being provided to the scientific community. Researchers can also request access to the data under collaborative and co-authorship agreements prior to the end of the funding period or before publication. The results from the proposed project will also be shared at scientific meetings (local, national and international) as well via published manuscripts.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

All data will be provided by the time publication occurs or when the proposed funding period has ended.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers can request access to the data under collaborative and co-authorship agreements prior to the end of the funding period or before publication.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Dysfunction

Clinical Trials on Active Theta Burst Stimulation

3
Subscribe