- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02417064
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Fixed Doses of Intranasal Esketamine Plus an Oral Antidepressant in Adult Participants With Treatment-resistant Depression (TRANSFORM-1)
A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Fixed Doses of Intranasal Esketamine Plus an Oral Antidepressant in Adult Subjects With Treatment-resistant Depression
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Aalst, Belgium
-
Brugge, Belgium
-
Brussel, Belgium
-
Bruxelles, Belgium
-
Gent, Belgium
-
Hasselt, Belgium
-
Heusden-Zolder, Belgium
-
Liège, Belgium
-
Spa, Belgium
-
Yvoir, Belgium
-
-
-
-
-
Belo Horizonte, Brazil
-
Curitiba, Brazil
-
Fortaleza, Brazil
-
Passo Fundo, Brazil
-
Porto Alegre, Brazil
-
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
-
Santo André, Brazil
-
-
-
-
Alberta
-
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
-
-
British Columbia
-
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
-
-
Ontario
-
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
-
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
-
-
Quebec
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
-
-
-
-
-
Parnu, Estonia
-
Tallinn, Estonia
-
Tartu, Estonia
-
-
-
-
-
BESANCON Cedex, France
-
Clermont Ferrand, France
-
Douai, France
-
Issy-les-Moulineaux, France
-
La Tronche, France
-
Lille, France
-
Limoges, France
-
Montpellier Cedex 5, France
-
Nantes, France
-
Neuilly sur Marne, France
-
Nimes Cedex 9, France
-
Paris, France
-
Poitiers, France
-
TOURS cedex 9, France
-
Toulon, France
-
-
-
-
-
Budapest, Hungary
-
Vác, Hungary
-
-
-
-
-
Guadalajara, Mexico
-
Leon, Mexico
-
Mazatlan, Mexico
-
Mexico City, Mexico
-
Monterrey, Mexico
-
San Luis Potosi, Mexico
-
San Luis Potosí, Mexico
-
-
-
-
-
Bratislava, Slovakia
-
Liptovsky Mikulas, Slovakia
-
Rimavska Sobota, Slovakia
-
Roznava, Slovakia
-
Svidnik, Slovakia
-
-
-
-
Alabama
-
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
-
-
Arkansas
-
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
-
-
California
-
Garden Grove, California, United States
-
Orange, California, United States
-
San Diego, California, United States
-
San Marcos, California, United States
-
San Rafael, California, United States
-
-
Florida
-
Bradenton, Florida, United States
-
Miami, Florida, United States
-
Orlando, Florida, United States
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States
-
Hoffman Estates, Illinois, United States
-
Maywood, Illinois, United States
-
Schaumburg, Illinois, United States
-
-
Kansas
-
Wichita, Kansas, United States
-
-
Maryland
-
Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
-
Quincy, Massachusetts, United States
-
Watertown, Massachusetts, United States
-
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
-
-
Minnesota
-
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
-
-
Missouri
-
O'Fallon, Missouri, United States
-
Saint Charles, Missouri, United States
-
-
Nebraska
-
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States
-
-
North Carolina
-
Durham, North Carolina, United States
-
-
Ohio
-
Dayton, Ohio, United States
-
-
Oklahoma
-
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Media, Pennsylvania, United States
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
-
-
Rhode Island
-
Lincoln, Rhode Island, United States
-
-
Texas
-
Austin, Texas, United States
-
Dallas, Texas, United States
-
Houston, Texas, United States
-
-
Vermont
-
Woodstock, Vermont, United States
-
-
Washington
-
Bothell, Washington, United States
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Middleton, Wisconsin, United States
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- At the time of signing the informed consent form (ICF), participant must be a man or woman 18 (or older if the minimum legal age of consent in the country in which the study is taking place is greater than [>]18) to 64 years of age, inclusive
- At the start of the screening/prospective observational phase, participant must meet the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) diagnostic criteria for single-episode major depressive disorder (MDD) (if single-episode MDD, the duration must be greater than or equal to [>=] 2 years) or recurrent MDD, without psychotic features, based upon clinical assessment and confirmed by the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)
- At the start of the screening/prospective observational phase, participant must have an Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician rated ( IDS-C30) total score of greater than or equal to (>=) 34
- At the start of the screening/prospective observational phase, participants must have had non-response (less than or equal to [<=25] percent [%] improvement) to >=1 but less than or equal to (<=) 5 (if current episode is >2 years, upper limit is applicable to only the last 2 years) oral antidepressant treatments taken at adequate dosage and for adequate duration, as assessed using the Massachusetts General Hospital - Antidepressant Treatment Response Questionnaire (MGH-ATRQ) and documented by medical history and pharmacy/prescription records, for the current episode of depression.
Participant is taking a different oral antidepressant treatment on the MGH-ATRQ for at least the previous 2 weeks at or above the minimum therapeutic dose
- The participant's current major depressive episode, depression symptom severity (Week 1 MADRS total score >=28 required), and antidepressant treatment response in the current depressive episode, must be confirmed using a Site Independent Qualification Assessment
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants who have previously demonstrated nonresponse of depressive symptoms to esketamine or ketamine in the current major depressive episode, to all 4 of the oral antidepressant treatment options available for the double-blind induction phase (i.e, duloxetine, escitalopram, sertraline, and venlafaxine extended release [XR]) in the current major depressive episode (based on MGH-ATRQ), or an adequate course of treatment with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in the current major depressive episode, defined as at least 7 treatments with unilateral/bilateral ECT
- Participant has received vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) or has received deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the current episode of depression
- Participant has a current or prior DSM-5 diagnosis of a psychotic disorder or MDD with psychotic features bipolar or related disorders (confirmed by the MINI), obsessive compulsive disorder (current only), intellectual disability (DSM-5 diagnostic codes 317, 318.0, 318.1, 318.2, 315.8, and 319), autism spectrum disorder, borderline personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder, histrionic personality disorder, or narcissistic personality disorder
- Participant has homicidal ideation/intent, per the investigator's clinical judgment, or has suicidal ideation with some intent to act within 6 months prior to the start of the screening/prospective observational phase, per the investigator's clinical judgment or based on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
- Participants with history of moderate or severe substance or alcohol use disorder according to DSM-5 criteria
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intranasal Esketamine 84mg plus Oral Antidepressant
As part of an initial titration, participants will self-administer 56 milligrams (mg) of esketamine intranasally on Day 1, and then 84 mg from Day 4 onwards, twice per week for 4 weeks as a fixed dose regimen in Double-Blind Induction Phase.
In addition participants will simultaneously initiate a new, open-label oral antidepressant (i.e, duloxetine, escitalopram, sertraline, or venlafaxine extended release [XR]) on Day 1 that will be continued for the duration of Double-Blind Induction Phase.
|
Duloxetine could be selected as the oral antidepressant medication by the investigator based on review of Massachusetts General Hospital - Antidepressant Treatment Response Questionnaire (MGH-ATRQ) and relevant prior antidepressant medication information.
The minimum therapeutic dose is 60 milligram per day (mg/day).
Participants will self-administer either 84 mg or 56 mg of esketamine, intranasally, twice per week for 4 weeks as a fixed dose regimen in Double-Blind Induction Phase.
Escitalopram could be selected as the oral antidepressant medication by the investigator based on review of MGH-ATRQ and relevant prior antidepressant medication information.
Escitalopram will be titrated up to a dose of 20 mg/day, but if not tolerated the dose can be reduced to the minimum therapeutic dose of 10 mg/day.
Sertraline could be selected as the oral antidepressant medication by the investigator based on review of MGH-ATRQ and relevant prior antidepressant medication information.
Sertraline will be titrated up to a dose of 200 mg/day, but if not tolerated the dose can be reduced to the minimum therapeutic dose of 50 mg/day.
Venlafaxine Extended Release could be selected as the oral antidepressant medication by the investigator based on review of MGH-ATRQ and relevant prior antidepressant medication information.
Venlafaxine Extended Release will be titrated up to a dose of 225 mg/day, but if not tolerated the dose can be reduced to the minimum therapeutic dose of 150 mg/day.
|
|
Experimental: Esketamine 56 mg plus Oral Antidepressant
Starting from Day 1, participants will self-administer 56 mg of esketamine, intranasally, twice per week for 4 weeks as a fixed dose regimen in Double-Blind Induction Phase.
In addition participants will simultaneously initiate a new, open-label oral antidepressant (i.e, duloxetine, escitalopram, sertraline, or venlafaxine XR) on Day 1 that will be continued for the duration of Double-Blind Induction Phase.
|
Duloxetine could be selected as the oral antidepressant medication by the investigator based on review of Massachusetts General Hospital - Antidepressant Treatment Response Questionnaire (MGH-ATRQ) and relevant prior antidepressant medication information.
The minimum therapeutic dose is 60 milligram per day (mg/day).
Participants will self-administer either 84 mg or 56 mg of esketamine, intranasally, twice per week for 4 weeks as a fixed dose regimen in Double-Blind Induction Phase.
Escitalopram could be selected as the oral antidepressant medication by the investigator based on review of MGH-ATRQ and relevant prior antidepressant medication information.
Escitalopram will be titrated up to a dose of 20 mg/day, but if not tolerated the dose can be reduced to the minimum therapeutic dose of 10 mg/day.
Sertraline could be selected as the oral antidepressant medication by the investigator based on review of MGH-ATRQ and relevant prior antidepressant medication information.
Sertraline will be titrated up to a dose of 200 mg/day, but if not tolerated the dose can be reduced to the minimum therapeutic dose of 50 mg/day.
Venlafaxine Extended Release could be selected as the oral antidepressant medication by the investigator based on review of MGH-ATRQ and relevant prior antidepressant medication information.
Venlafaxine Extended Release will be titrated up to a dose of 225 mg/day, but if not tolerated the dose can be reduced to the minimum therapeutic dose of 150 mg/day.
|
|
Active Comparator: Placebo plus Oral Antidepressant
Participants will self-administer matching placebo, intranasally, twice per week for 4 weeks as a fixed dose regimen in Double-Blind Induction Phase.
In addition participants will simultaneously initiate a new, open-label oral antidepressant (i.e, duloxetine, escitalopram, sertraline, or venlafaxine XR) on Day 1 that will be continued for the duration of Double-Blind Induction Phase.
|
Duloxetine could be selected as the oral antidepressant medication by the investigator based on review of Massachusetts General Hospital - Antidepressant Treatment Response Questionnaire (MGH-ATRQ) and relevant prior antidepressant medication information.
The minimum therapeutic dose is 60 milligram per day (mg/day).
Escitalopram could be selected as the oral antidepressant medication by the investigator based on review of MGH-ATRQ and relevant prior antidepressant medication information.
Escitalopram will be titrated up to a dose of 20 mg/day, but if not tolerated the dose can be reduced to the minimum therapeutic dose of 10 mg/day.
Sertraline could be selected as the oral antidepressant medication by the investigator based on review of MGH-ATRQ and relevant prior antidepressant medication information.
Sertraline will be titrated up to a dose of 200 mg/day, but if not tolerated the dose can be reduced to the minimum therapeutic dose of 50 mg/day.
Venlafaxine Extended Release could be selected as the oral antidepressant medication by the investigator based on review of MGH-ATRQ and relevant prior antidepressant medication information.
Venlafaxine Extended Release will be titrated up to a dose of 225 mg/day, but if not tolerated the dose can be reduced to the minimum therapeutic dose of 150 mg/day.
Participants will self-administer matching placebo, intranasally, twice per week for 4 weeks as a fixed dose regimen in Double-Blind Induction Phase.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score up to Day 28 of Double- Blind Induction Phase- Mixed- Effects Model Using Repeated Measures (MMRM) Analysis
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 28 of Double-blind Induction Phase
|
MADRS is clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity, and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment.
Scale consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts), each of which is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent more severe condition.
|
Baseline up to Day 28 of Double-blind Induction Phase
|
|
Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score up to Endpoint (Double-blind Induction Phase [Day 28])- ANCOVA Analysis
Time Frame: Baseline up to Double-blind Endpoint (Day 28)
|
MADRS is clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity, and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment.
Scale consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts), each of which is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent more severe condition.
Missing data was imputed using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method and last post baseline observation during double-blind induction phase was carried forward as "End Point" for that phase.
|
Baseline up to Double-blind Endpoint (Day 28)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical Response by Day 2 and Day 8
Time Frame: Day 2 up to Day 28 and Day 8 up to Day 28
|
A participant was defined as having a clinical response if there was at least 50% improvement (decrease) from baseline in the MADRS total score with onset by Day 2 and Day 8 that was maintained to Day 28.
Participants were allowed one excursion (non-response) on Days 8, 15 or 22, however score must show at least 25% improvement.
Participants who did not meet these criteria or discontinued during the study before Day 28 were considered as non-responders and were assigned the value of 0 (that is no).
MADRS is clinician-rated scale that consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts), each of which is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of symptoms), for total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent more severe condition.
|
Day 2 up to Day 28 and Day 8 up to Day 28
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score up to Day 28 of Double-blind Induction Phase- MMRM Analysis
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 28 of Double-blind Induction phase
|
The SDS is a participant-reported outcome measure and 5 item questionnaire used for assessment of functional impairment and associated disability.
The first 3 items assess disruption of 1) work/school, 2) social life, and 3) family life/home responsibilities using 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely) rating scale.
Score for first 3 items are summed to create total score of 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired), where higher score indicates greater impairment.
|
Baseline up to Day 28 of Double-blind Induction phase
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score up to Endpoint (Double-blind Induction Phase [Day 28])- ANCOVA Analysis
Time Frame: Baseline up to Double-blind Endpoint (Day 28)
|
The SDS is a participant-reported outcome measure and 5 item questionnaire used for assessment of functional impairment and associated disability.
The first 3 items assess disruption of 1) work/school, 2) social life, and 3) family life/home responsibilities using 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely) rating scale.
Score for first 3 items are summed to create total score of 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired) where higher score indicates greater impairment.
Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the double-blind induction phase was carried forward as "End Point" for that phase.
|
Baseline up to Double-blind Endpoint (Day 28)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Total Score up to Day 28 of Double-blind Induction Phase- MMRM Analysis
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 28 of Double-blind Induction phase
|
PHQ-9 is 9-item, self-reported scale assessing 9 symptom domains of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder criteria.
Each item is rated on 4-point scale (0 = Not at all, 1 = Several Days, 2 = More than half days, 3 = Nearly every day).
The scores are summed for a total score ranging from 0-27.
Higher score indicates greater severity of depression.
Severity of PHQ-9 categorized as follows: None-minimal (0-4), Mild (5-9), Moderate (10-14), Moderately Severe (15-19), Severe (20-27).
The recall period is 2 weeks.
|
Baseline up to Day 28 of Double-blind Induction phase
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Total Score up to Endpoint (Double-blind Induction Phase [Day 28])- ANCOVA Analysis
Time Frame: Baseline up to Double-blind Endpoint (Day 28)
|
PHQ-9 is 9-item, self-reported scale assessing 9 symptom domains of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder criteria.
Each item is rated on 4-point scale (0 = Not at all, 1 = Several Days, 2 = More than half days, 3 = Nearly every day).
The scores are summed for a total score ranging from 0-27.
Higher score indicates greater severity of depression.
Severity of PHQ-9 categorized as follows: None-minimal (0-4), Mild (5-9), Moderate (10-14), Moderately Severe (15-19), Severe (20-27).
The recall period is 2 weeks.
Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the double-blind induction phase was carried forward as "End Point" for that phase.
|
Baseline up to Double-blind Endpoint (Day 28)
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 50% Reduction From Baseline in MADRS Total Score at Day 28 of Double-blind Induction Phase (Observed Data)
Time Frame: At Day 28 of Double-blind Induction phase
|
A participant was defined as a responder (yes=1 and no=0) at a given time point if the percent reduction from baseline in MADRS total score is at least 50 percent (%).
The percentage of participants who achieved at least 50% reduction from baseline were reported.
MADRS is clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity, and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment.
Scale consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts), each of which is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent more severe condition.
|
At Day 28 of Double-blind Induction phase
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 50% Reduction From Baseline in MADRS Total Score at the Endpoint (Double-blind Induction Phase [Day 28]) (LOCF Data)
Time Frame: At Day 28 (Double-blind Endpoint)
|
A participant was defined as a responder (yes=1 and no=0) at a given time point if the percent reduction from baseline in MADRS total score is at least 50 percent (%).
The percentage of participants who achieved at least 50% reduction from baseline were reported.
MADRS is clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity, and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment.
Scale consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts), each of which is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent more severe condition.
Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the double-blind induction phase was carried forward as "End Point" for that phase.
|
At Day 28 (Double-blind Endpoint)
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Remission (MADRS<=12) at Day 28 of Double-blind Induction Phase (Observed Data)
Time Frame: At Day 28 of Double-blind Induction Phase
|
Participants who had a MADRS total score of less than or equal to (<=) 12 were considered as remitters.
MADRS is clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity, and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment.
Scale consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts), each of which is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent more severe condition.
|
At Day 28 of Double-blind Induction Phase
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Remission (MADRS<=12) at the Endpoint (Double-blind Induction Phase [Day 28])- ANCOVA Analysis (LOCF Data)
Time Frame: At Day 28 (Double-blind Endpoint)
|
Participants who had a MADRS total score of less than or equal to (<=) 12 were considered as remitters.
MADRS is clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity, and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment.
Scale consists of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts), each of which is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent more severe condition.
Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the double-blind induction phase was carried forward as "End Point" for that phase.
|
At Day 28 (Double-blind Endpoint)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Score up to Endpoint (Double-blind Induction Phase [Day 28])
Time Frame: Baseline up to Double-blind Endpoint (Day 28)
|
CGI-S provides measure of severity of participant's illness including participant's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior and impact of symptoms on ability to function.
CGI-S evaluates severity of psychopathology on scale of 0 to 7. Considering total clinical experience, participant is assessed on severity of mental illness according to: 0=not assessed; 1=normal (not at all ill); 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among most extremely ill patients (a decrease in score indicates improvement).
Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the double-blind induction phase was carried forward as "End Point" for that phase.
|
Baseline up to Double-blind Endpoint (Day 28)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Item (GAD-7) Total Score up to Endpoint (Double-blind Induction Phase [Day 28])
Time Frame: Baseline up to Double-blind Endpoint (Day 28)
|
GAD-7 is a brief and validated 7-item self-reported assessment of overall anxiety.
Participants responded to each item using a 4 point scale with response categories of 0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, and 3=nearly every day.
Item responses are summed to yield a total score with a range of 0 to 21, where higher scores indicate more anxiety.
The recall period is 2 weeks.
The severity of the GAD-7 is categorized as follows: None (0-4), Mild (5-9), Moderate (10-14) and Severe (15-21).
Missing data was imputed using LOCF method and the last post baseline observation during the double-blind induction phase was carried forward as "End Point" for that phase.
|
Baseline up to Double-blind Endpoint (Day 28)
|
|
Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) up to End of Double-blind Induction Phase (Day 28): Health Status Index
Time Frame: Baseline up to End of Double-blind Induction Phase (Day 28)
|
EQ-5D-5L measures health outcome self-completed by respondents.
It consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS).
The descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Each has 5 levels (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems).
The responses are used to generate Health Status Index (HSI).
HSI range is -0.148 to 0.949, is anchored at 0 (dead) and 1 (full health).
|
Baseline up to End of Double-blind Induction Phase (Day 28)
|
|
Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) up to End of Double-blind Induction Phase (Day 28): EQ-VAS
Time Frame: Baseline up to end of Double-blind induction phase (Day 28)
|
EQ-5D-5L measures health outcome self-completed by respondents.
It consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS).
EQ-VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his/her overall health status at time of completion, on scale of 0 (the worst health you can imagine) to 100 (the best health you can imagine).
|
Baseline up to end of Double-blind induction phase (Day 28)
|
|
Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) up to End of Double-blind Induction Phase (Day 28): Sum Score
Time Frame: Baseline up to end of Double-blind Induction phase (Day 28)
|
EQ-5D-5L measures health outcome self-completed by respondents.
It consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS).
The descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression.
Each has 5 levels (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems).
The responses are used to generate Health Status Index (HSI).
HSI range is -0.148 to 0.949, is anchored at 0 (dead) and 1 (full health).
EQ-VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his/her overall health status at time of completion, on scale of 0 (the worst health you can imagine) to 100 (the best health you can imagine).
Sum score ranges from 0 to 100 where, sum score = (sum of the scores from the 5 dimensions minus 5) *5.
Higher score indicates worst health state.
|
Baseline up to end of Double-blind Induction phase (Day 28)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Dean RL, Hurducas C, Hawton K, Spyridi S, Cowen PJ, Hollingsworth S, Marquardt T, Barnes A, Smith R, McShane R, Turner EH, Cipriani A. Ketamine and other glutamate receptor modulators for depression in adults with unipolar major depressive disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 12;9(9):CD011612. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011612.pub3.
- Perez-Ruixo C, Rossenu S, Zannikos P, Nandy P, Singh J, Drevets WC, Perez-Ruixo JJ. Population Pharmacokinetics of Esketamine Nasal Spray and its Metabolite Noresketamine in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2021 Apr;60(4):501-516. doi: 10.1007/s40262-020-00953-4. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
- Jha MK, Williamson DJ, Magharehabed G, Turkoz I, Daly EJ, Trivedi MH. Intranasal esketamine effectively treats treatment-resistant depression in adults regardless of baseline irritability. J Affect Disord. 2023 Jan 15;321:153-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.10.020. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
- Chen G, Chen L, Zhang Y, Li X, Lane R, Lim P, Daly EJ, Furey ML, Fedgchin M, Popova V, Singh JB, Drevets WC. Relationship Between Dissociation and Antidepressant Effects of Esketamine Nasal Spray in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2022 Apr 19;25(4):269-279. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyab084.
- Jones RR, Freeman MP, Kornstein SG, Cooper K, Daly EJ, Canuso CM, Nicholson S. Efficacy and safety of esketamine nasal spray by sex in patients with treatment-resistant depression: findings from short-term randomized, controlled trials. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2022 Apr;25(2):313-326. doi: 10.1007/s00737-021-01185-6. Epub 2022 Jan 1.
- Turkoz I, Daly E, Singh J, Lin X, Tymofyeyev Y, Williamson D, Salvadore G, Nash AI, Macaluso M, Wilkinson ST, Nelson JC. Treatment Response With Esketamine Nasal Spray Plus an Oral Antidepressant in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression Without Evidence of Early Response: A Pooled Post Hoc Analysis of the TRANSFORM Studies. J Clin Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 20;82(4):20m13800. doi: 10.4088/JCP.20m13800.
- Doty RL, Popova V, Wylie C, Fedgchin M, Daly E, Janik A, Ochs-Ross R, Lane R, Lim P, Cooper K, Melkote R, Jamieson C, Singh J, Drevets WC. Effect of Esketamine Nasal Spray on Olfactory Function and Nasal Tolerability in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression: Results from Four Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Studies. CNS Drugs. 2021 Jul;35(7):781-794. doi: 10.1007/s40263-021-00826-9. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
- Katz EG, Hough D, Doherty T, Lane R, Singh J, Levitan B. Benefit-Risk Assessment of Esketamine Nasal Spray vs. Placebo in Treatment-Resistant Depression. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Feb;109(2):536-546. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2024. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
- Saad Z, Hibar D, Fedgchin M, Popova V, Furey ML, Singh JB, Kolb H, Drevets WC, Chen G. Effects of Mu-Opiate Receptor Gene Polymorphism rs1799971 (A118G) on the Antidepressant and Dissociation Responses in Esketamine Nasal Spray Clinical Trials. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020 Dec 3;23(9):549-558. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaa030.
- Fedgchin M, Trivedi M, Daly EJ, Melkote R, Lane R, Lim P, Vitagliano D, Blier P, Fava M, Liebowitz M, Ravindran A, Gaillard R, Ameele HVD, Preskorn S, Manji H, Hough D, Drevets WC, Singh JB. Efficacy and Safety of Fixed-Dose Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a New Oral Antidepressant in Treatment-Resistant Depression: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Study (TRANSFORM-1). Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019 Oct 1;22(10):616-630. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyz039.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Mental Disorders
- Behavioral Symptoms
- Mood Disorders
- Depression
- Depressive Disorder
- Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant
- Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Sensory System Agents
- Analgesics
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Membrane Transport Modulators
- Psychotropic Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Uptake Inhibitors
- Dopamine Agents
- Serotonin Agents
- Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors
- Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation
- Duloxetine Hydrochloride
- Esketamine
- Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
- Escitalopram
- Antidepressive Agents
- Sertraline
Other Study ID Numbers
- CR107146
- ESKETINTRD3001 (Other Identifier: Janssen Research & Development, LLC)
- 2014-004584-20 (EudraCT Number)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Treatment-resistant Depression
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreRecruitingTreatment-Resistant Depression | Treatment-resistant Depression (TRD)Canada
-
Changping LaboratoryBeijing HuiLongGuan HospitalSuspendedTreatment-Resistant DepressionChina
-
Washington University School of MedicineNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedTreatment-resistant DepressionUnited States
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...Recruiting
-
University Hospital FreiburgBoston Scientific CorporationCompletedTreatment-resistant DepressionGermany, France
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompletedTreatment-resistant DepressionUnited States, Australia, France, United Kingdom, Belgium, Germany, Taiwan, Spain, Argentina, Mexico, Poland, Bulgaria, Malaysia, South Africa, Turkey, Finland, Korea, Republic of, Brazil, Austria, Sweden, Lithuania
-
Central Institute of Mental Health, MannheimCharite University, Berlin, Germany; German Federal Ministry of Education and... and other collaboratorsCompletedTreatment-resistant DepressionGermany
-
University of OttawaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)Completed
-
Centre for Addiction and Mental HealthCompletedTreatment-resistant DepressionCanada
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang UniversityRecruitingTreatment-resistant DepressionChina
Clinical Trials on Duloxetine (Oral Antidepressant)
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompletedTreatment-resistant DepressionUnited States, Poland, Germany, Spain, Czechia
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompletedDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantUnited States, France, Poland, Belgium, Germany, Spain, Mexico, Turkey, Canada, Brazil, Estonia, Hungary, Slovakia, Sweden, Czechia
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompletedDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantUnited States, France, Belgium, Spain, Poland, Bulgaria, South Africa, Finland, Brazil, Sweden, United Kingdom, Lithuania
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompletedDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantUnited States, China
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompletedTreatment-resistant DepressionUnited States, Australia, France, United Kingdom, Belgium, Germany, Taiwan, Spain, Argentina, Mexico, Poland, Bulgaria, Malaysia, South Africa, Turkey, Finland, Korea, Republic of, Brazil, Austria, Sweden, Lithuania
-
Yale UniversityNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK); National...RecruitingInsulin Resistance | Obesity and Overweight | Obesity and Obesity-related Medical ConditionsUnited States
-
University of PennsylvaniaNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Completed
-
University Hospital, CaenActive, not recruitingPregnancy Related | Neonatal Hypotonia | Antidepressant Drug Adverse ReactionFrance
-
Peking UniversityRecruiting
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang UniversityRecruitingDepressive DisorderChina