- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05833295
Electrophysiological and Clinical Effects of Walking Downhill in Stroke Patients
investigation of the effects of walking for 20 minutes on the acute H/M ratio on flat ground, downhill slopes at -7.5 degrees and -15 degrees in patients who have had a stroke, have spasticity and are ambulatory.
At the same time, the aim of the study is to obtain the clinical effectiveness of this walking pattern and control of the H/M ratio by checking the H/M ratio again after 5 sessions and 20 minutes of walking for the patients participating in the study.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Participants will wear a seat belt connected to an overhead support and will walk on a treadmill with a dual-band instrument at a sampling frequency of 2000 Hz. The seat belt will only serve as a safety mechanism in case of a fall and will not support any body weight while walking. Each participant will walk for 20 minutes under one of 3 slope conditions; treadmill walking on 0° flat ground, , downhill walking with treadmill on -7.5° slope and downhill walking with treadmill on -15° slope.
First, by asking the participants to walk at their comfortable speed for straight walking on the treadmill with tools, the walking speed will be determined and carried out at the specified speeds. All self-selected walking speeds will be determined in two 30-second trials. During the 20-minute walk for each condition, if the participant needs to slow down, the speed of the treadmill will be reduced to adapt to this, and the average walking speed during the 20-minute walking session will be reported. Pulse and blood pressure will be monitored before, during and after the walk.
All participants will be evaluated with modified asworth scale, modified tardeu scale, 2 minute walking test, modified rankin scale, timed get up and walk test, fatigue impact scale, stroke impact scale, berg balance scale, fugl meyer assessment scale before treatment.
Patients will be randomized into 3 groups. Then, the H / M ratio will be looked at in all 3 groups. After the first walking session, the H / M ratio will be repeated. after completing the 5-session walking program, clinical and electrophysiological tests will be repeated.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Özge Keniş Coşkun, MD
- Phone Number: 05058294947
- Email: Ozgekenis@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Burak Yıldız, Dr.
- Phone Number: 05546797417
- Email: adaletli_26@hotmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey, 34000
- Mamara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
-
Contact:
- Özge Keniş Coşkun, MD
- Phone Number: 02167775500
- Email: tip.etikkurul@marmara.edu.tr
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
patients diagnosed with stroke between the ages of 18 and 65 Dec
Exclusion Criteria:
Other neurological disorders,
- Expressive or receptive aphasias,
- Severe heart disease,
- A history of poorly controlled diabetes,
- Active cancer,
Those who have been injected with botilinum toxin in the last 3 months,
- Orthopedic conditions affecting the legs, a history of hip or knee replacement,
- Serious simultaneous medical problems, such as peripheral nerve damage
- Inability to comprehend verbal instructions
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Walking on flat ground
Patients will walk for 20 minutes at a 0% slope.
|
Change in the H/M ratio after a Walking on flat ground
|
|
Experimental: -%7.5 Downhill walking
They will walk downhill for 20 minutes at a -(negative)7.5% gradient.
|
Change in the H/M ratio after a downhill walk.
|
|
Experimental: -%15 Downhill walking
They will walk downhill for 20 minutes at a -(negative)15% gradient.
|
Change in the H/M ratio after a downhill walk.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
the change in the H/M ratio after a 20-minute walk.
Time Frame: Day 0: Before the walk
|
Each participant will be evaluated for changes in the H/M ratio with an EMG device before the walk, on the 1st day of the walk, and on the 5th day of the walk.
|
Day 0: Before the walk
|
|
the change in the H/M ratio after a 20-minute walk.
Time Frame: Day 1: First day of 20-minute walk
|
Each participant will be evaluated for changes in the H/M ratio with an EMG device before the walk, on the 1st day of the walk, and on the 5th day of the walk.
|
Day 1: First day of 20-minute walk
|
|
the change in the H/M ratio after a 20-minute walk.
Time Frame: Day 5: The fifth day of the 20-minute walk
|
Each participant will be evaluated for changes in the H/M ratio with an EMG device before the walk, on the 1st day of the walk, and on the 5th day of the walk.
|
Day 5: The fifth day of the 20-minute walk
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Modified Asworth Scale
Time Frame: Day 0: Before the walk
|
Modified Asworth Scale is a spasticity assessment test.
It contains 4 points in total.
As the score increases, the degree of spasticity increases.
|
Day 0: Before the walk
|
|
Modified Asworth Scale
Time Frame: Day 5: The fifth day of the 20-minute walk
|
Modified Asworth Scale is a spasticity assessment test.
It contains 4 points in total.
As the score increases, the degree of spasticity increases.
|
Day 5: The fifth day of the 20-minute walk
|
|
Modified Tardeu Scale
Time Frame: Day 0: Before the walk
|
Modified Tardeu Scale is a spasticity assessment test.
It contains 5 points in total.
As the score increases, the degree of spasticity increases.
|
Day 0: Before the walk
|
|
Modified Tardeu Scale
Time Frame: Day 5: The fifth day of the 20-minute walk
|
Modified Tardeu Scale is a spasticity assessment test.
It contains 5 points in total.
As the score increases, the degree of spasticity increases.
|
Day 5: The fifth day of the 20-minute walk
|
|
Walking test
Time Frame: Day 0: Before the walk
|
2 minute walking test
|
Day 0: Before the walk
|
|
Walking test
Time Frame: Day 5: The fifth day of the 20-minute walk
|
2 minute walking test
|
Day 5: The fifth day of the 20-minute walk
|
|
Walking capacity
Time Frame: Day 0: Before the walk
|
Timed Get Up and Walk Test
|
Day 0: Before the walk
|
|
Walking capacity
Time Frame: Day 5: The fifth day of the 20-minute walk
|
Timed Get Up and Walk Test
|
Day 5: The fifth day of the 20-minute walk
|
|
The Fatigue Effect Scale
Time Frame: Day 0: Before the walk
|
The fatigue effect scale consists of 9 questions.
Each question gets points between 0 and 7.
The total score is divided by the number of questions.
If the result is greater than 6.1, it is defined as chronic fatigue.
|
Day 0: Before the walk
|
|
Fatigue
Time Frame: Day 5: The fifth day of the 20-minute walk
|
The fatigue effect scale consists of 9 questions.
Each question gets points between 0 and 7.
The total score is divided by the number of questions.
If the result is greater than 6.1, it is defined as chronic fatigue.
|
Day 5: The fifth day of the 20-minute walk
|
|
Stroke impact scale
Time Frame: Day 0: Before the walk
|
Stroke Impact Scale; patients' quality of life after stroke to assess their perception by themselves or their caregivers This scale consists of 8 subsections and 59 questions. each one question is a 5-point Likert scale of difficulty experienced in the past week. It is scored by evaluation on the scale. each section The score ranges from 0 to 100. In addition, the stroke impact scale has 8 subsections. 0-100 point visual analog of the perception of recovery after stroke. scale (0: No improvement, 100: Full recovery) |
Day 0: Before the walk
|
|
Stroke impact scale
Time Frame: Day 5: The fifth day of the 20-minute walk
|
Stroke Impact Scale; patients' quality of life after stroke to assess their perception by themselves or their caregivers This scale consists of 8 subsections and 59 questions. each one question is a 5-point Likert scale of difficulty experienced in the past week. It is scored by evaluation on the scale. each section The score ranges from 0 to 100. In addition, the stroke impact scale has 8 subsections. 0-100 point visual analog of the perception of recovery after stroke. scale (0: No improvement, 100: Full recovery) |
Day 5: The fifth day of the 20-minute walk
|
|
Berg Equilibrium Scale
Time Frame: Day 0: Before the walk
|
It is a scale that includes 14 instructions and is scored between 0-4 by observing the patient's performance for each instruction. While 0 points are given when the patient cannot do the activity at all, 4 points are given when the patient completes the activity independently. The highest score is 56, with 0-20 points indicating balance disorder, 21 40 points indicating an acceptable balance, 41-56 points indicating a good balance. It takes between 10 and 20 minutes to complete the scale. It is a scale that includes 14 instructions and is scored between 0-4 by observing the patient's performance for each instruction. While 0 points are given when the patient cannot do the activity at all, 4 points are given when the patient completes the activity independently. The highest score is 56, with 0-20 points indicating balance disorder, 21 40 points indicating an acceptable balance, 41-56 points indicating a good balance. It takes between 10 and 20 minutes to complete the scale. |
Day 0: Before the walk
|
|
Berg Equilibrium Scale
Time Frame: Day 5: The fifth day of the 20-minute walk
|
It is a scale that includes 14 instructions and is scored between 0-4 by observing the patient's performance for each instruction.
While 0 points are given when the patient cannot do the activity at all, 4 points are given when the patient completes the activity independently.
The highest score is 56, with 0-20 points indicating balance disorder, 21 40 points indicating an acceptable balance, 41-56 points indicating a good balance.
It takes between 10 and 20 minutes to complete the scale.
|
Day 5: The fifth day of the 20-minute walk
|
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale
Time Frame: Day 0: Before the walk
|
The full version of FMRS assesses five domains: motor function, balance, sensory function, range of motion (ROM) and joint pain.
In the full version of the scale, when all subscales (sensory function 24 points, balance 14 points, ROM 44 points, joint pain 44 points and motor-coordination 100 points) are added, the maximum total score is 226.
The motor-coordination subscale is a maximum of 66 points for the upper extremity and a maximum of 34 points for the lower extremities.
Higher scores indicate better motor recovery.
Each item is scored with a 3-point ordinal scale (0: unable at all, 1: partially able, 2: fully able).
When items related to coordination and speed are not included in the evaluation in the lower extremity motor-coordination subscale, it is specified as the lower extremity motor subscale and its maximum score is evaluated out of 28.
|
Day 0: Before the walk
|
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale
Time Frame: Day 5: The fifth day of the 20-minute walk
|
The full version of FMRS assesses five domains: motor function, balance, sensory function, range of motion (ROM) and joint pain.
In the full version of the scale, when all subscales (sensory function 24 points, balance 14 points, ROM 44 points, joint pain 44 points and motor-coordination 100 points) are added, the maximum total score is 226.
The motor-coordination subscale is a maximum of 66 points for the upper extremity and a maximum of 34 points for the lower extremities.
Higher scores indicate better motor recovery.
Each item is scored with a 3-point ordinal scale (0: unable at all, 1: partially able, 2: fully able).
When items related to coordination and speed are not included in the evaluation in the lower extremity motor-coordination subscale, it is specified as the lower extremity motor subscale and its maximum score is evaluated out of 28.
|
Day 5: The fifth day of the 20-minute walk
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- MAR.FTR.ST
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stroke
-
National Assembly ClinicBayero University Kano, NigeriaRecruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke Ischemic | Hemiparesis After StrokeNigeria
-
University of PittsburghRecruitingHemorrhagic Stroke | Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source | Ischemic Stroke, Cryptogenic | Recurrent Ischemic Stroke | Ischemic Stroke, EmbolicUnited States
-
Mahidol UniversityNot yet recruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke SurvivorsThailand
-
Mahidol UniversityRecruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke PatientThailand
-
University Hospital, GhentRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicBelgium
-
Moleac Pte Ltd.Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, Cryptogenic
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusScuola Superiore Sant'Anna di Pisa; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus...Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Upper Limb Rehabilitation | Stroke IschemicItaly
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedChronic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | ExoskeletonSouth Korea
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoRecruitingStroke, Ischemic | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke, CerebrovascularUnited States
-
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicItaly
Clinical Trials on Walking on flat ground
-
Trakya UniversityCompleted
-
Istanbul UniversityCompleted
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonCompletedUnilateral Amputation of the Lower LimbFrance
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonRecruiting
-
Henan University of Traditional Chinese MedicineShanxi Bethune Hospital; Henan Fantasy Intelligent Technology Co., LtdNot yet recruitingChronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseChina
-
Universidade Federal de Sao CarlosFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo; Conselho Nacional de...CompletedStroke | HemiparesisBrazil
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedAgingKorea, Republic of
-
Federal University of Health Science of Porto AlegreFederal University of Rio Grande do SulCompletedParkinson DiseaseBrazil
-
October 6 UniversityRecruitingImpact of Underwater Exercise Versus Regular Aerobic Exercise on Quality of Life and Power of MuscleQuality of Life | Muscle Weakness | PatientJordan
-
Federal University of Health Science of Porto AlegreCompleted