Home Monitoring of Adult Patients With SMA: a Pilot Multicenter Validation Study (SMA-AtHome)

November 30, 2023 updated by: Institut de Myologie, France
There is no complete cure for SMA yet. However, the discovery of the genetic cause of SMA has led to the development of several treatment options that affect the genes involved in SMA - a gene replacement therapy called Zolgensma, and two drugs, called Nusinersen (Spinraza) and Risdiplam (Evyrsdi). In this context, the evaluation of efficacy and the long term follow-up of patients treated with these innovative treatments in clinical routine is one of the critical points. These evaluations are carried out in a medical context (clinical sites or research unit) using validated measurement tools and outcome measures. Carrying out these evaluations in a controlled environment can be considered from certain aspects as an advantage (reproducibility of measures, neutral environment, etc.), but also raises a certain number of questions regarding the impact on patients, the financial cost, or the relevance of the data obtained in an unnatural environment (stress, fatigue, patient motivation…). Also the regulatory authorities ask for longitudinal data for deciding to reimburse these expensive treatments. As such, the hospital cannot digest all these evaluations due to a lack of resources.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In the last few years, a number of therapeutic approaches have targeted a possible increase of the production of SMN protein in target motor neurons by genetic replacement of the defective SMN1 gene or by modifying pre-mRNA splicing in SMN2 to promote exon 7 inclusion by using an antisense oligonucleotide or small molecule drugs. Several clinical studies have focused on the evaluation of patients with SMA, whether they are ambulatory or not, adults, children or infants, treated or untreated.

Depending on the SMA type, age or ambulatory status of the patients, different assessments (motor function scales or questionnaires) have provided consistent results to measure the evolution of the patients, such as HFMSE, MFM, RULM, 6MWT, MRC scale, Chop Intend or HINE.

As these evaluations are generally carried out in a controlled environment, they are likely to present an environmental bias. Even if studies are designed to anticipate and avoid most of these issues, different factors can influence patient test results (fatigue, motivation, stress, day to day variability…). From an economical point of view, the evaluation of patients in a controlled environment also has a significant cost, which heavily impact the global cost of clinical research or standard care (transport, patients' accommodation and care…). This factor is even more important as a significant proportion of the SMA population is non-ambulatory.

New treatments are indicated to treat SMA with a major impact on pre-existing disease standards of care and patients care pathway. In particular, there is no consensus on appropriate measures to monitor disease progression and treatment effect in a real-world setting. Such measures are critically needed to discuss treatment indication (treatment initiation criteria and stopping rules, therapeutic goals) and treatment monitoring. While patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) become more represented, objective functional measures are still required to assess SMA. In spite of the development of digital measures, no validated patient self-reported functional measures can be used as a surrogate. Thus, the objective disease assessment is currently based on validated outcome measures for SMA, similar to those used in clinical studies. As compared to clinical trials, the feasibility to administer these measures to SMA patients is challenging. Major limiting factors are: (1) the high disease-prevalence, (2) time-consuming measures, (3) the need for trained expert evaluators, and (4) limited access to hospital-based resources. In addition, the burden of affected individuals and caregivers has not been evaluated as well as patient treatment monitoring expectations. A refined approach using modern tools and fitting with patient real life environment is needed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Angers, France, 49933
        • CHU d'Angers
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Marco Spinazzi, MD
        • Contact:
      • Lille, France, 59000
        • CHU de Lille
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jean-Baptiste Davion, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Celine Tard, MD
      • Nantes, France, 44093
        • CHU de Nantes
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Yann Pereon, MD
        • Contact:
      • Paris, France, 75013
        • Institute of Myology
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Guillaume Bassez, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jean-Yves Hogrel, PhD
      • Reims, France, 51092
        • CHU de Reims
        • Contact:
      • Tours, France, 37044
        • CHRU de Tours
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sybille Pellieux, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years
  • Confirmed SMA type 2 or 3 diagnostic
  • Written informed consent
  • Able to comply with all protocol requirements
  • Affiliate or beneficiary of a social security scheme

Non-Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to carry out assessments at home
  • Claustrophobia (only for patients from Paris and Lille sites)
  • Guardianship/trusteeship
  • Pregnant or nursing women

Exclusion criteria:

  • Inability to comply with protocol requirements
  • Any medical and social conditions that could interfere with the study under the appreciation of the medical coordinator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Home to onsite monitoring
Patients will be monitored and evaluate in a first time at home then onsite.
The grip and pinch strength of the patient will be evaluate using dedicated devices (MyoGrip and MyoPinch)
Other Names:
  • MyoGrip/Pinch
Lower and upper limb capacities of the patients will be measured during timed tests
Other Names:
  • 10mWT, 30STS, 6MWT, 9HPT
Patient's motor functional abilities will be evaluated using specific motor scales (MFM32, RULM)
Patients and caregivers quality of life will be measured with different questionnaires (SMA-FRS, QOL-gNMD, SMAIS, PREM)
Patients physical activity will be measured at home using accelerometer sensors
Sub-group of patients will perform an NMR imaging to evaluate the intramuscular fatty infiltration in thighs and muscle volume in thighs
The patients' muscular and fatty volume will be evaluated using BIA technic (compared to MNR)
Other: Onsite to Home monitoring
Patients will be monitored and evaluate in a first time onsite then at home .
The grip and pinch strength of the patient will be evaluate using dedicated devices (MyoGrip and MyoPinch)
Other Names:
  • MyoGrip/Pinch
Lower and upper limb capacities of the patients will be measured during timed tests
Other Names:
  • 10mWT, 30STS, 6MWT, 9HPT
Patient's motor functional abilities will be evaluated using specific motor scales (MFM32, RULM)
Patients and caregivers quality of life will be measured with different questionnaires (SMA-FRS, QOL-gNMD, SMAIS, PREM)
Patients physical activity will be measured at home using accelerometer sensors
Sub-group of patients will perform an NMR imaging to evaluate the intramuscular fatty infiltration in thighs and muscle volume in thighs
The patients' muscular and fatty volume will be evaluated using BIA technic (compared to MNR)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To compare the results of physical evaluations between home and hospital
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks
Evaluation of the correlations between results obtained during the physical evaluations at home compared to those obtained at hospital
Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To determine the barriers for evaluation at home
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks
Inventory of items and assessments not carried out at home due to the environment
Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks
Correlation of home and hospital muscle volume measurement methods
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks
Comparison of muscle volumes measured by bio-impedancemetry with those obtained by MRI.
Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks
Correlation of home and hospital MyoGrip measurement
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks
Comparison of MyoGrip measurements obtained at home and at the hospital.
Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks
Correlation of home and hospital MyoPinch measurement
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks
Comparison of MyoPinch measurements obtained at home and at the hospital.
Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks
Correlation of home and hospital MFM results
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks
Comparison of MFM evaluation results obtained at home and at the hospital.
Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks
Correlation of home and hospital RULM results
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks
Comparison of RULM evaluation results obtained at home and at the hospital.
Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks
Correlation of home and hospital 30STS tests results
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks
Comparison of 30STS measurements obtained at home and at the hospital.
Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks
Correlation of home and hospital 9HPT results
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks
Comparison of 9HPT measurements obtained at home and at the hospital.
Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Muscular Atrophy, Spinal, Type II

Clinical Trials on Strength force measurment

Subscribe