Extension Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Jaktinib in Patients With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis(AS)

January 9, 2024 updated by: Suzhou Zelgen Biopharmaceuticals Co.,Ltd

An Open-Label, Multicenter, Extension Study to Assess the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Jaktinib in Patients With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis(AS)

The purpose of this study is to determine if Jaktinib is safe and effective in participants with active ankylosing spondylitis.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

258

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200001

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The investigators concluded that the participants continued to benefit from treatment with Jaktinib.
  • The participants have been fully informed and voluntarily signed informed consent.
  • The participants completed the ZGJAK029 study for 16 weeks of treatment and visitation and had good compliance.
  • The interval between the participants' first dose and the last dose of ZGJAK029 ≤ 4 weeks.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • There were any grade ≥3 adverse events within 4 weeks prior to enrollment and no return to grade 1 or normal.
  • Within 4 weeks prior to enrollment, participants had the following infectious diseases: tuberculosis infection requiring treatment; HIV-positive, syphilis, HBV infection, HCV infection.
  • The investigators considered participants unsuitable for this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Jaktinib 100mg BID (twice daily)
Participants will receive 100 mg Jaktinib orally twice daily for 32 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Related Discontinuations at 32 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 32
Treatment-emergent AEs were events that occurred between first dose of study drug and up to 32 weeks that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
Baseline up to Week 32

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Achieving ASAS20 Response at Week 4, 8, 12, 16,20,24,28 and 32
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16,20,24,28 and 32
ASAS20 assess 4 domains: PGA of Disease (assess disease activity on a scale of 0 [not active] to 10 [very active], high score=more disease activity), total back pain (scale of 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe pain], high score=more severity), Function (BASFI; participant's level of ability on scale of 0 [easy] to 10 [impossible], low score= better functional health) and Inflammation (morning stiffness, Mean of Q5 and Q6 of BASDAI defined as 6-item questionnaire measure disease activity on a scale of 0 [none] to 10 [severe], high score=more disease activity). ASAS20 response: >= 20% improvement from baseline in disease activity and absolute change of >=1 unit in >=3 domains and no worsening of >=20% and an absolute change of >=1 unit in remaining domain.
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16,20,24,28 and 32
Percentage of Participants Achieving ASAS40 Response at Week 4, 8, 12, 16,20,24,28 and 32
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16,20,24,28 and 32
ASAS40 assessed 4 domains: the "PGA" (assess disease activity on a scale of 0 [not active] to 10 [very active], higher score=more disease activity), total back pain (on a scale of 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe pain], higher score=more severity), Function (from BASFI: assess participant's level of ability on a scale of 0 [easy] to 10 [impossible], lower scores= better functional health) and Inflammation (morning stiffness, Mean of Q5 and Q6 of BASDAI defined as 6 item questionnaire: measures disease activity on a scale of 0 [none] to 10 [severe], higher score=more disease activity). ASAS40 response: >=40% and >=2 units improvement in >=3 domains and no worsening at all in the remaining domain.
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16,20,24,28 and 32
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Spinal Pain: Total Back Pain at Week 4, 8, 12, 16,20,24,28 and 32
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16,20,24,28 and 32
Participants marked their level of total back pain on a numerical rating scale (NRS) ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain), with higher scores indicated more severe pain.
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16,20,24,28 and 32
Percentage of Participants Achieving ASAS 5/6 Response at Week 4, 8, 12, 16,20,24,28 and 32
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16,20,24,28 and 32
ASAS 5/6 consists of 6 domains: 4 used in ASAS20 - PGA (assess disease activity on a scale of 0 [not active] to 10 [very active], higher score=more disease activity), Spinal Pain (total back pain) (on a scale of 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe pain], higher score=more severity), Function (using BASFI which assess participant's level of ability on a scale of 0 [easy] to 10 [impossible], lower scores= better functional health) and Inflammation (using BASDAI, mean of Q 5 and 6, which assess disease activity on a scale of 0 [none] to 10 [severe], higher score=more disease activity), CRP (was measured in mg per liter) and Spinal mobility was measured in centimeter and calculated as mean of right and left measurements of lateral spinal flexion from BASMI. ASAS 5/6: defined as >=20% improvement in at least 5 domains.
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16,20,24,28 and 32

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chunde Bao, RenJi Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ankylosing Spondylitis

Clinical Trials on Jaktinib

Subscribe