Predictors Associated With Maintaining Driving in Old Age

July 28, 2023 updated by: Nathalie BARTH, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne

Predictive Factors Associated With Continued Driving in Old Age : a Mixed Methods Approach

The goal of this observational study is to learn about predictors associated with maintaining driving in old age. The main questions it aims to answer are :

  • which and how medical factors can influence stopping or maintaining driving (quantitative research)
  • how social environment can influence stopping or maintaining driving (quantitative research)
  • what are the needs of all the actors in the field (qualitative research)
  • know about the opinions and practices of all the actors in the field (qualitative research) Participants will be ask to answer questions in an interview taking about an hour. Quantitative research will ask participants to fill out a questionnaire about social environment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

FAMACO is a project led by Gérontopôle Auvergne Rhône-Alpes (AURA) and Chaire Santé des Ainés of the Jean Monet University, supported by the Observatoire National Interministériel de la Sécurité Routière (ONISR), that aims prevent the loss of autonomy of the elderly population by identifying predictors associated with maintaining driving in old age. This is a mixed quantitative and qualitative prospective study.

Quantitative study identify medical factors linked to stopping driving by analysis data from "PROnostic of factors OF cardiovascular or neurovascular disease" (PROOF) cohort. In addition, a questionnaire on the social environment was addressed to participants.

Qualitative study focus on identifying the expectations and needs of all concern populations : elderly divers, elderly former drivers, general practitioner, geriatrician, certified driver's license physician, law enforcement, driving instructors and emergency services. This qualitative study will be carried out on three different sites : Saint-Etienne, Marseille, and Lille.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

657

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lille, France
        • François Puisieux
      • Marseille, France
        • Sylvie Bonin-Guillaume
    • Loire
      • Saint-Étienne, Loire, France, 42000
        • Nathalie Barth

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

7 populations are included in the study: older 65 people ; attending physicians ; law enforcement ; certified driver's license ; physicians ; geriatricians ; driving instructors ; personal assistance services. For each of them, the respondents are based in one of the three investigation sites: Saint-Etienne, Lille or Marseille. For people aged 65 and over, a questionnaire is also distributed.

Description

Inclusion criteria :

  • being part of one of the population studied (older 65 people ; attending physicians ; law enforcement ; certified driver's license ; physicians ; geriatricians ; driving instructors ; personal assistance services)
  • live in Saint-Etienne, Marseille or Lille

Exclusion criteria :

None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Older 80 people
Semi-structured interviews were conducted for the qualitative research. In addition, a driving habits questionnaire was administered. To complete this questionnaire, medical data from the PROOF cohort were collected.The PROOF cohort is a prospective study for which enrollment began in 2001. The main objective is to evaluate the predictive value of Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) activity and its decline during follow-up on the occurrence of serious and cerebral events, and on all-cause mortality, in a general population of subjects of homogeneous age. Participants were included in the study if they were 65 years of age (plus or minus 2 years) at the time of inclusion and registered on the electoral list of the city of St Etienne, had not had a previous myocardial infarction or stroke and were non-insulin dependent.
An interview guide was developed for each population. Depending on the population interviewed, this interview guide focuses on the current state of driving, the obstacles and levers to driving, the representations related to driving by the elderly, their opinion concerning the implementation of a potential aptitude test and more generally their opinion on policies related to road safety.
The questionnaire asks people aged 80 and over included in the PROOF cohort about their relationship to driving, their driving status, their societal and personal environment, the circumstances in which they stopped driving, recent accidents and, more generally, their driving habits.
Attending physicians
Semi-structured interviews were conducted for the qualitative research
An interview guide was developed for each population. Depending on the population interviewed, this interview guide focuses on the current state of driving, the obstacles and levers to driving, the representations related to driving by the elderly, their opinion concerning the implementation of a potential aptitude test and more generally their opinion on policies related to road safety.
law enforcement
Semi-structured interviews were conducted for the qualitative research
An interview guide was developed for each population. Depending on the population interviewed, this interview guide focuses on the current state of driving, the obstacles and levers to driving, the representations related to driving by the elderly, their opinion concerning the implementation of a potential aptitude test and more generally their opinion on policies related to road safety.
certified driver's license physicians
Semi-structured interviews were conducted for the qualitative research
An interview guide was developed for each population. Depending on the population interviewed, this interview guide focuses on the current state of driving, the obstacles and levers to driving, the representations related to driving by the elderly, their opinion concerning the implementation of a potential aptitude test and more generally their opinion on policies related to road safety.
geriatricians
Semi-structured interviews were conducted for the qualitative research
An interview guide was developed for each population. Depending on the population interviewed, this interview guide focuses on the current state of driving, the obstacles and levers to driving, the representations related to driving by the elderly, their opinion concerning the implementation of a potential aptitude test and more generally their opinion on policies related to road safety.
driving instructors
Semi-structured interviews were conducted for the qualitative research
An interview guide was developed for each population. Depending on the population interviewed, this interview guide focuses on the current state of driving, the obstacles and levers to driving, the representations related to driving by the elderly, their opinion concerning the implementation of a potential aptitude test and more generally their opinion on policies related to road safety.
personal assistance services
Semi-structured interviews were conducted for the qualitative research
An interview guide was developed for each population. Depending on the population interviewed, this interview guide focuses on the current state of driving, the obstacles and levers to driving, the representations related to driving by the elderly, their opinion concerning the implementation of a potential aptitude test and more generally their opinion on policies related to road safety.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Views and representations of the different populations on the conduct of the elderly
Time Frame: Day 1
Representations and habits of elderly driving were study by individual semi-directive interviews. The aims is to identify, in the accounts of experiences, the practices, the relationship to driving and to other forms of transport, the lived experience, the representations of driving and ageing.
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Driving habits of elderly
Time Frame: Day 1

Habits of elderly driving were study by a questionnaire to understand the social and personal environment in relation to driving habits.

The Evaluation of Precariousness and health Inequalities in health Examination Centers Score (EPICES score) was measured in this questionnaire. This individual indicator allows for the measurement of precariousness by taking into account its multidimensional nature.The questionnaire is composed of 11 questions which summarise 90% of the precariousness situation of a subject. Each question is assigned a coefficient and the sum of the answers gives the score. The score is continuous and varies from 0 (no insecurity) to 100 (maximum insecurity). The threshold of 30 is considered as the threshold of precariousness.

Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 5, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 24, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GA-2021-06

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aged, 80 and Over

Clinical Trials on Semi-structured interviews

Subscribe